Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2012.28.3.194

Simple Method for the Local Stakeholdersto Evaluate and Select National REDD-plus Program: A Case Study of Indonesia  

Inoue, Makoto (Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo)
Publication Information
Journal of Forest and Environmental Science / v.28, no.3, 2012 , pp. 194-198 More about this Journal
Abstract
In order not to hinder the trend of promoting participatory forest management under the REDD-plus mechanism, we propose a simple method to support local stakeholders evaluating and selecting promising national programs as REDD-plus activities prior to the launch of activities. Program evaluation is done from the viewpoint of expectations for achieving (1) 'triple-benefit' consisting of emission reduction from mitigating deforestation and forest degradation, biodiversity conservation, and poverty alleviation, and (2) 'feasibility' when the programs would be practiced on the ground. The method is applicable for other countries.
Keywords
emission reduction; biodiversity conservation; poverty alleviation; triple-benefit; Indonesia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Angelsen A, eds. 2008. Moving ahead with REDD: Issues, options and implications. CIFOR, Bogor.
2 Angelsen A, eds. 2009 Realizing REDD+: National strategy and policy options. CIFOR, Bogor.
3 Bofin P, du Preez ML, Standing A, Williams A. 2011. REDD Integrity: Addressing governance and corruption challenges in schemes for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD). U4 Report 1. Bergen
4 Bond I, Grig-Gran M, Wwrtz-Kanounnikoff S, Hazlewood P, Wunder S, Angelsen A. 2009. Incentives to sustain forest ecosystem services: A review and lessons for REDD. international Institute for Environment and Development, London.
5 FAO. 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, FAO, Rome.
6 Inoue M. 2010. Appropriate Incentive Distribution Mechanisms Under Emerging REDD-plus Regime: Focusing on Triple-Benefit and Legitimacy (in Japanese). Research on Environmental Disruption 40: 16-22.
7 Kjaer AM. 2004. Governance. Polity Press, Cambridge.
8 Parker C. 2011. Policy Brief: The Outcome for Forests Emerging from Cancun. Global Canopy Program (GCP), Oxford.