Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2011.27.2.4

Are Poverty and Illiteracy to Blame for Forests Degradation? A Case Study of Mbeya Range Forest Reserve. Mbeya-Tanzania  

Ngondya, Issakwisa Bernard (Department of Forest Resources, College of Agriculture, Graduate School of Industry, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Ibrahim, Rashid Ismael Hag (Department of Horticulture, College of Life Sciences and Natural Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Choo, Gab-Chul (Department of Forest Resources, College of Agriculture, Graduate School of Industry, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of Forest and Environmental Science / v.27, no.2, 2011 , pp. 93-99 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, a total of 350 households contained 700 individuals in Iganzo village were surveyed to study their literate and poverty levels and their impacts to conservation of the Mbeya Range Forest Reserve. The study included 350 women and 350 men. The majority of respondents were between the ages of 31-40 years old (53%), while the rest were between 41-50 years old (25%) and 21-30 years old (22%). The total income per day per household was calculated and averaged to 4,570 Tanzanian shillings that is equal to about 3 U.S. dollars. The average number of members per household was seven. It was reported that, there is a tremendous decrease in biodiversity composition of the reserve mainly due to poverty (80%) and ignorance (76%) of the people on the importance of the reserve. Other causes for this decrease were reported to be grazing of livestock in the reserve (23%), poor farming systems (68%), which resulted in soil erosion, encroachment (64%) through expansion of farms towards the reserve boundary and charcoal burning (34%). Respondents from Mbeya Urban Water Supply Authority and District Forest Office mentioned lack of funds (49%) and lack of experts (56%) as challenges that face the conservation of the reserve. It was revealed that 25% of respondents had never gone to school, 53% had primary level of education as their highest level of education, 20% had secondary education and 2% had first degree. The null hypothesis that poverty and illiteracy have a positive correlation to forest degradation was accepted based on these findings at a probability of p>0.85. Thus, it was concluded that poverty and illiteracy among Iganzo village residents are the main causes for the degradation of biodiversity in Mbeya Range Forest Reserve.
Keywords
Degradation; Household; Income; Illiteracy; Management; Poverty;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 McKone, D. and V. Walzem. 1994. A brief survey of Mbeya Region catchment forest reserves. Government of Tanzania/EEC Agroforestry, Soil and Water Conservation Project/Regional Natural Resources Office, Mbeya.
2 McKone, D. 1995. A Brief Survey of the Traditional Forest Reserves of Rungwe District, Mbeya Region, Tanzania. Unpublished Draft Report. Government of Tanzania/EEC Agroforestry, Soil and Water Conservation Project, Mbeya.
3 Baral, N. and J.T. Heinen. 2007. Resources use, conservation attitudes, management intervention and park-people relations in the Western Terai landscape of Nepal. Environmental Conservation. 1-9.
4 Brewer, C. 2006. Translating Data into Meaning: Education in conservation Biology. Conservation Biology. 20(3): 689-691.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Deacon, R.T. 1994. Deforestation and the rule of law in a crosssection of countries. Land economics. 70(4): 414-430.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Fisher, B. and T. Christopher. 2006. Poverty and Biodiversity: Measuring the overlap of human poverty and biodiversity hotspots. Ecological Economics. 62: 93-101.
7 Geist, H. and E. Lambin. 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience. 52(2): 143-150.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Lingani, P.C., Tigabu, M., Savadogo, P.,Oden, P.C. and J.M. Ouadba. 2009. Determinants of access to forest products in Southern Burkina Faso. Forest Policy and Economics. 11: 516-524.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 MNRT (Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism) (2001) National Forest program 2001-2010. Government Printer Dar-es-salaam, Tanzania.
10 McNeely, J.A. and S.J. Scherr. 2003. Eco-agriculture: Strategies to Feed the World and save Wild Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington.
11 Sanderson, S. 2005. Poverty and Conservation: The New Century's "Peasant Question?" World Development. 33(2): 323-332.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Shiva, V. 1993. Monocultures of the Mind: Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology. Natraj Publishers, Dehra Dun.
13 Sunderlin, W.D., Angelsen, A.,Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., and S. Wunder .2005. Livelihoods, Forests and Conservation in Developing Countries: An overview. World Development. 33(9): 1383-1402.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Swanson, T. 1997. Global action for Biodiversity: An International framework for implementing the convention on Biological. Earth-scan publications ltd, London, U.K.