Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2014.29.4.305

The Analysis for Minimum Infective Dose of Foodborne Disease Pathogens by Meta-analysis  

Park, Myoung Su (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kunsan National University)
Cho, June Ill (Food Microbiology Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation)
Lee, Soon Ho (Foodborne Diseases Prevention and Surveillance Division, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)
Bahk, Gyung Jin (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kunsan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety / v.29, no.4, 2014 , pp. 305-311 More about this Journal
Abstract
Minimum infective dose (MID) data has been recognized as an important and absolutely needed in quantitative microbiological assessment (QMRA). In this study, we performed a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis to better quantify this association. The meta-analysis applied a final selection of 82 published papers for total 12 species foodborne disease pathogens (bacteria 9, virus 2, and parasite 1 species) which were identified and classified based on the dose-response models related to QMRA studies from PubMed, ScienceDirect database and internet websites during 1980-2012. The main search keywords used the combination "food", "foodborne disease pathogen", "minimum infective dose", and "quantitative microbiological risk assessment". The appropriate minimum infective dose for B. cereus, C. jejuni, Cl. perfringens, Pathogenic E. coli (EHEC, ETEC, EPEC, EIEC), L. monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., S. aureus, V. parahaemolyticus, Hepatitis A virus, Noro virus, and C. pavum were $10^5cells/g$ (fi = 0.32), 500 cells/g (fi = 0.57), $10^7cells/g$ (fi = 0.56), 10 cells/g (fi = 0.47) / $10^8cells/g$ (fi = 0.71) / $10^6cells/g$ (fi = 0.70) / $10^6cells/g$ (fi = 0.60), $10^2{\sim}10^3cells/g$ (fi = 0.23), 10 cells/g (fi = 0.30), 100 cells/g (fi = 0.32), $10^5cells/g$ (fi = 0.45), $10^6cells/g$ (fi = 0.64), $10{\sim}10^2particles/g$ (fi = 0.33), 10 particles/g (fi = 0.71), and $10{\sim}10^2oocyst/g$ (fi = 0.33), respectively. Therefore, these results provide the preliminary data necessary for the development of foodborne pathogens QMRA.
Keywords
foodborne disease; meta-analysis; quantitative microbiological risk assessment; minimum infective dose;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Mead, P.S., Slutsker, L., Dietz, V., McCaig, L.F., Bresee, J.S., Shapiro, C., Griffin, P.M. and Tauxe, R.V.: Food-Related Illness and Death in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 5, 607-625 (1999).   DOI   ScienceOn
2 FAO/WHO: Joint FAO/WHO Imitative on Microbial Risk Assessment. IAFP 88th Annual meeting. Aug 7. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. (2001).
3 Baranyi, J. and Roverts, T.A.: A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. J. Food Microbiol., 23, 277-294 (1994).   DOI   ScienceOn
4 식품의약품안전청 (KFDA): 식중독예방 대국민 홍보사이트 Available from: http://fm.kfda.go.kr/ (2009).
5 박경진: 국내 주요 가공식품에 대한 위해순위 결정. 한국식품위생안전성학회지, 24, 200-203 (2009).   과학기술학회마을
6 Luning, P.A., Devlieghere, F. and Verhe, R.: Safety in the agrifood chain. Wageningen Academic Publishers. 95, (2006)
7 Wikipedia: Infectious doses for some known microorganisms. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infectious_dose., (2010).
8 Burrows, W.D. and Renner, S.E.: Biological Warfare Agents as Threats to Potable Water. Environ. Health Perspect., 107, 975-984 (1999).   DOI
9 Todar, K.: Pathogenic E. coli (page 4). Todar's Online Text book of Bacteriology. Available from:http://textbookofbacteriology.net/e.coli_4.html. (2012).
10 Leggett, H.C., Cornwallis, C.K. and West, S.A.: Mechanisms of Pathogenesis, Infective Dose and Virulence in Human Parasites. PLoS Pathog., 8, 1-5 (2012)
11 Kisluk, G., Hoover, D.G., Kneil, K.E. and Yaron, S.: Quantification of low and high levels of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium on leaves. Lebenson. Wiss. Technol., 45, 36-42 (2012).   DOI
12 Kothary, M.H. and BABU, U.S.: Infective dose of food borne pathogens in volunteers: a review. J. Food Saf., 21, 49-73 (2001).   DOI
13 FDA CFSAN (Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition): Quantitative Risk Assessment on the Public Health Impact of Pathogenic vibrio parahaemolyticus In Raw Oysters., 17-18 (2005).
14 Dawson, D.: Foodborne protozoan parasites. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 103, 207-227 (2005).   DOI
15 Sofos, J.N.: Bacterial Foodborne Diseases. FAVA-OIE Joint Sym. Emer. Dis., 27, 19-34 (2008).
16 Giovannini, A., Migliorati, G., Prencipe, V., Calderone, D., Zuccolo, C. and Cozzolino, P.: Risk assessment for listeriosis in consumers of Parma and San Daniele hams. Food Control., 18, 789-799 (2007).   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Hsu, B.M., Wu, S.F., Huang, S.W., Tseng, Y.J., Ji, D.D., Chen, J.S. and Shih, F. C.: Differentiation and identification of Shigella spp. and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli in environmental waters by a molecular method and biochemical test. Water res., 44, 949-955 (2010).   DOI
18 Stevenypark: Food Toxemia-Non-Inflammatory Diarrhea. Available from: http://quizlet.com/7078170/food-toxemia-non-inflammatory- diarrhea-57-flash-cards., (2011).
19 PHAC (Public Health Agency of Canada): Infective Doses and Pathogen Carriage. Available from: http://199.140.114.2/PDF/Atlanta2010/Slides_FSEC_JGreig_Dose., (2010).
20 Iwahori, J.I., Yamamoto, A., Suzuki, H., Yamamoto, T., Tsutsui, T., Motoyama, K., Sawada, M., Matsushita, T., Hasegawa, A. and Osaka, K.: Quantitative Risk Assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Finfish: A model of Raw Horse Mackerel Consumption in Japan. Risk Anal., 30, 1817-1832 (2010).   DOI
21 Xavier, C., Gonzales-Barron, U., Paula, V., Estevinho, L. and Cadavez, V.: Meta-analysis of the incidence of foodborne pathogens in Portuguese meats and their products. Food Res. Int., 55, 311-323, (2014).   DOI
22 Xavier, C., Gonzales-Barron, U., Paula, V., Estevinho, L. and Cadavez, V.: Meta-analysis of the incidence of foodborne pathogens in Portuguese meats and their products. Food Res. Int., 55, 311-323 (2014).   DOI
23 Den Besten, H.M.W. and Zwietering, M.H.: Meta-analysis for quantitative microbiological risk assessments and benchmarking data. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 25, 34-49 (2012).   DOI
24 Gonzales-Barron, U. and Butler, F.: The use of meta-analytical tools in risk assessment for food safety. Food Microbiol., 28, 823-827 (2011).   DOI
25 Snelling, W.J., Matsuda, M., Moore, J.E. and Dooley J.S.G.: Under the Microscope Campylobacter jejuni. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 41, 297-302 (2005).   DOI
26 Buchanan, R.L., Smith, J.L. and Long, W.: Microbial risk assessment: Dose response relations and risk characterization. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 58, 159-172 (2000).   DOI   ScienceOn