Browse > Article

Cleaning Effects of Environmental-Friendly Washing Detergent on Milking Installation in Dairy Farms  

Kim, Chang-Hyun (School of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University)
Park, Joong-Kook (National institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Publication Information
Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety / v.25, no.4, 2010 , pp. 346-353 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine cleaning effects of environmental-friendly washing detergent on milking installation in dairy farms. Milking machine, cooling machine and milking liner were washed by alkaline detergent and acid detergent for first three weeks and alkaline detergent and environmental~friendly detergent for next three weeks and the results get through microorganism and physico-chemistry analysis at the five district dairy farms different from environment. E-coli, coliform, fecal coliform, staphylococcus aureus, fecal streptococcus, prsudomonas aeruginosa and yersinia were not found in all of the dairy farms, and total colony counts were no difference compared with chemical detergent. The water for washing exceeded the determining acceptable level of nitrate nitrogen in the Anseong, Onyang and Cheonan and the remaining substance of washed water was also high levels. The cause of the result was that the level of nitrate nitrogen of water is basically high. Therefore, this study indicated that washing effect is no differences between environmental-friendly detergent and chemical detergent by washing for milking machine and cooling machine. Above all, producing high quality milk is to manage the water quality as well as using detergent.
Keywords
Environmental-friendly washing detergent; Milking machine; Cooling machine; Milking liner; microorganism;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hambrueus, L.: The Significant of mother's milk and breastseeding for development and later life. Bibl Nutr Dieta, 31, 1-16 (1982).
2 허강칠: 우유생산농가의 냉각 저장 설비에 따른 우유의 품질 변화, 한국낙농학회지, 6, 62-70 (1984).
3 허정원, 김영주: 착유과정이 원유의 미생물 품질에 미치는 영향, 한국낙농학회지, 18, 65-70 (1996).
4 환경부: 우리나라의 비점오염원 관리정책방향, p. 154 (2003).
5 이종택, 박승용, 권일경, 김현욱: 한국산 납유원유의 품질에 관한 연구, 한국낙농학회지, 5, 14-21 (1983).
6 이현동, 배철호: 비점오염원 배출특성과 저감을 위한 최적관리방안, 한국물환경학회지, 18, 569-606 (2002).
7 김종우, 김용국: 여과 처리가 우유의 및 세균함량에 미치는 영향, 한국축산학회지, 19, 219-324 (1977).
8 이희수, 이명헌, 정갑수, 조병훈, 이광직, 이승환, 김정임, 김문배, 박종명, 조준형, 김옥경: 메틸렌블루 비색법을 이용 한 원유중 음이온 계면활성제의 분석, 한국수의보건공중학회지, 25, 253-256 (2001).
9 정충일, 배인휴, 강국희, 이재영: 생유의 취급 조건에 따른 세균수의 변화, 한국낙농학회지, 6, 53-61 (1984).
10 김종우: 대전지방 우유에 대한 L.T.L.T. 살균법의 적용에 관한 연구, 한국축산학회지, 10, 114-117 (1968).
11 김종욱, 김내수: 원유의 유질개선에 관한 기초연구, 한국축산학회지, 27, 477-486 (1980).
12 Krapac, I.G., Dey, W.S., Smyth, C.A. and Roy, W.R.: Impacts of bacteria, metals, and nutrients on groundwater at two hog confinement facilities. Proceeding 5. of the National Ground Water Association Animal Feeding Operations and Ground Water: lssues, Impacts, and Solutions-A Con-ference for the Future, St. Louis MO, pp. 29-50 (1998).
13 김영교, 전문진: 우유생산과 유질향상에 관한 기초연구, 고대농림논총, 13, 129-140 (1972).
14 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Environmental indicators of water quality in the United States. EPA 841-R-96- 002. Office of Water, Washington, DC (1996).
15 고준수: 우유 사육 농가별 원료유 품질에 관한 연구, 한국축산학회지, 12, 315-320 (1970).
16 고한종, 최흥림, 김기연: 질소 동위원소비를 이용한 관행농업과 유기농업에서의 질산태 질소 오염원 구명, 한국동물자원과학회지, 47, 481-490 (2005).
17 김대중, 정충일: 국산 원유의 미생물학적 품질 개선에 관한 연구, 한국낙농학회지, 15, 95-102 (1993).
18 Marth, E,H. and Frazier, W.C.: Bacteriology of milk held at farm cooling tank. J. Milk Food Technol., 20, 93-95 (1957).
19 Hartly, J.C., Vadamuthu, E.R. and Reinhold, G.W.: Bacteriological method for evaluation of raw milk quality. A. review. J. Food Protect, 32, 4-15 (1969).
20 Parry, R.: Agricultural phosphate and water quality: a U.S. Evironmental 8. Protection Agency perspective. J. Environ. Qual., 27, 258-261 (1998)
21 Hollen, B.F., Owens, J.R. and Sewell, J.I.: Water quality in a stream receiving dairy feedlot effluent. J. Environ Qual, 11, 5-9 (1992).