1 |
Ennis JM, Jesionka V. The power of sensory discrimination methods revisited. J. Sens. Stud. 26: 371-382 (2011)
DOI
|
2 |
Ennis JM, Rousseau B, Ennis DM. Sensory difference tests as measurement instruments: A review of recent advances. J. Sens. Stud. 29: 89-102 (2014)
DOI
|
3 |
Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. John Wiley, Oxford, England. (1966)
|
4 |
Ishii R, O'Mahony M, Rousseau B. Triangle and tetrad protocols: Small sensory differences, resampling and consumer relevance. Food Qual. Prefer. 31: 49-55 (2014)
DOI
|
5 |
Jeong YN, Kang BA, Jeong MJ, Song MJ, Hautus MJ, Lee HS. Sensory discrimination by consumers of multiple stimuli from a reference: Stimulus configuration in A-Not AR and constant-ref. duo-trio superior to triangle and unspecified tetrad? Food Qual. Prefer. 47: 10-22 (2016)
DOI
|
6 |
Jeong YN, van Hout D, Groeneschild C, Lee HS. Comparative identification method: Using 2-AFC strategy in constant-reference duo-trio for discrimination of multiple stimuli from a reference. Food Qual. Prefer. 62: 284-295 (2017)
DOI
|
7 |
Kim IA, Kim HL, Cho HY, Lee HS. Optimal difference test sequence and power for discriminating soups of varying sodium content: DTFM version of dual-reference duo-trio with unspecified tetrad tests. Food Res. Int. 76: 458-465 (2015a)
DOI
|
8 |
Kim MA, Lee HS. Investigation of operationally more powerful duo- trio test protocols: Effects of different reference schemes. Food Qual. Prefer. 25: 183-191 (2012)
DOI
|
9 |
Kim MA, Sim HM, Lee HS. Affective discrimination methodology: Determination and use of a consumer-relevant sensory difference for food quality maintenance. Food Res. Int. 70: 47 -54 (2015b)
DOI
|
10 |
Kuesten CL. Sequential use of the triangle, 2-AC, 2-AFC, and same-different methods applied to a cost-reduction effort: Consumer learning acquired throughout testing and influence on preference judgements. Food Qual. Prefer. 12: 447-455 (2001)
DOI
|
11 |
Lawless HT, Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices (2nd ed). Springer, NY, USA. pp. 83-84; 101-123 (2010)
|
12 |
Lee HS, O'Mahony M. The evolution of a model: A review of Thurstonian and conditional stimulus effects on difference testing. Food Qual. Prefer. 18: 369-383 (2007)
DOI
|
13 |
Macmillan NA, Creelman CD. Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, NJ, USA. (2005)
|
14 |
Moon JW. Investigation of test performance of dual reminder A-Not A (DR A-Not A) in comparison to 3-AFC for sensory discrimination of drinking water. (Master dissertation). Ewha Womans University, Korea (2016)
|
15 |
Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev. 34: 273-286 (1927a)
DOI
|
16 |
Peryam DR, Swartz VW. Measurement of sensory differences. Food Technol. 4: 390-395 (1950)
|
17 |
Rousseau B, Ennis JM. Importance of correct instructions in the tetrad test. J. Sens. Stud. 28: 264-269 (2013)
DOI
|
18 |
Shin HK, Hautus MJ, Lee HS. Unspecified duo-trio tests as powerful as the specified 2-AFC: Effects of instructions and familiarization procedures on cognitive decision strategies. Food Res. Int. 79: 114-125 (2016)
DOI
|
19 |
Thurstone LL. Psychophysical analysis. Am. J. Psychol. 38: 368-389 (1927b)
DOI
|
20 |
van Hout D. Measuring meaningful differences: Sensory testing based decision making in an industrial context; applications of Signal detection theory and Thurstonian modelling. (Doctoral dissertation). Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Rotterdam, Nederland (2014)
|
21 |
van Hout D, Hautus MJ, Lee HS. Investigation of test performance over repeated sessions using signal detection theory: Comparison of three non-attribute specified difference tests 2-AFCR, A-Not A and 2-AFC. J. Sens. Stud. 26: 311-321 (2011)
DOI
|
22 |
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). International standards for drinking-water (3rd ed). (1971)
|
23 |
Zoeteman BCJ. Sensory assessment of water quality. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England. pp. 19-33 (1980)
|
24 |
McGuire MJ. Off-flavor as the consumer's measure of drinking water safety. Water Sci. Technol. 31: 1-8 (1995)
DOI
|
25 |
Peryam DR. Sensory difference tests. Food Technol. 12: 231-236 (1958)
|
26 |
Ennis JM. The year of the tetrad test. J. Sens. Stud. 28: 257-258 (2013)
DOI
|
27 |
Bi J. Similarity tests using forced-choice methods in terms of Thurstonian discriminal distance, d′. J. Sens. Stud. 26: 151-157 (2011)
DOI
|
28 |
Ennis DM. The power of sensory discrimination methods. J. Sens. Stud. 8: 353-370 (1993)
DOI
|
29 |
Ennis JM. Guiding the switch from triangle testing to tetrad testing. J. Sens. Stud. 27: 223-231 (2012)
DOI
|
30 |
Ennis JM, Christense RHB. A thurstonian comparison of the tetrad and degree of difference tests. Food Qual. Prefer. 40: 263-269 (2014)
DOI
|