1 |
Amerine MA, Pangborn RM, Roessler EB. Principles of sensory evaluation of food. Academic Press, New York, London (1965)
|
2 |
Ares G, Mawad F, Gimenez A, Maiche A. Influence of rational and intuitive thinking styles on food choice: Preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study with yogurt labels. Food Qual. Prefer. 31: 28-37 (2014)
DOI
|
3 |
Berlyne DE. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Percept Psychophys. 8: 279-286 (1970)
DOI
|
4 |
Institute of Food Technologists. Explore Core Sciences. Available from: http://www.ift.org. Accessed Feb. 18, 2019.
|
5 |
Kemp SE, Hollowood T, Hort J. Sensory evaluation. A Practical Handbook, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK (2009)
|
6 |
Kim IA, Hopkinson A, Van Hout D, Lee HS. A novel two-step rating-based 'double-faced applicability'test. Part 1: Its performance in sample discrimination in comparison to simple one-step applicability rating. Food Qual. Prefer. 56: 189-200 (2017a).
DOI
|
7 |
Kim IA, Hopkinson A, van Hout D, Lee HS. A novel two-step rating-based 'double-faced applicability'test. Part 2: Introducing a novel measure of affect magnitude (d′ A) for profiling consumers' product usage experience based on Signal Detection Theory. Food Qual. Prefer. 59: 141-149 (2017b)
DOI
|
8 |
Kim MA, Dessirier JM, van Hout D, Lee HS. Consumer context-specific sensory acceptance tests: Effects of a cognitive warm-up on affective product discrimination. Food Qual. Prefer. 41: 163-171 (2015)
DOI
|
9 |
Kim MA, van Hout D, Dessirier JM, Lee HS. Degree of satisfaction-difference (DOSD) method for measuring consumer acceptance: A signal detection measurement with higher reliability than hedonic scaling. Food Qual. Prefer. 63: 28-37 (2018a)
DOI
|
10 |
Kim MA, van Hout D, Lee HS. Degree of satisfaction-difference (DOSD) method for measuring consumer acceptance: Comparative and absolute measures of satisfaction based on signal detection theory. Food Qual. Prefer. 68: 167-172 (2018b)
DOI
|
11 |
Korean Society of Food Science and Technology. Information for Divisions. Available from: http://www.kosfost.or.kr. Accessed Feb. 18, 2019.
|
12 |
Koster EP. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Qual. Prefer. 20: 70-82 (2009)
DOI
|
13 |
Lawless HT, Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices. 2nd ed. Springer, NY, USA (2010)
|
14 |
Lee HS. Product innovation and quality management based on sensory and consumer science. In: 7th Foodpolis International Conference. November 15, Foodpolis, Iksan, Korea. Foodpolis, Iksan, Korea (2017)
|
15 |
Meiselman HL. The effect of context environment on choice and acceptance: is context more important than product. Appetite 39: 249 (2002)
|
16 |
Lee HS. Evolution of sensory and consumer sciences(abstract no.D3-1). In: International Symposium and Annual Meeting, KoSFoST Beyond 50 Years: Renew the New in Food Science. June 27-29, Busan Exhibition & Convention Center (BEXCO), Busan, Korea, KoSFoST, Seoul, Korea (2018)
|
17 |
Mawad F, Trias M, Gimenez A, Maiche A, Ares G. Influence of cognitive style on information processing and selection of yogurt labels: Insights from an eye-tracking study. Food Res. Int. 74: 1-9 (2015)
DOI
|
18 |
Meilgaard M, Carr BT, Civille GV. Sensory evaluation techniques. 3rd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA (2010)
|
19 |
Pangborn RM. Sensory Evaluation of Food: A Look Forward and Back. Food Technol. 18: 1309-1324 (1964)
|
20 |
Pliner P, Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite 19: 105-120 (1992)
DOI
|
21 |
Rozin P. Food choice: an introduction. pp. 3-29. In: Understanding consumers of food products. Frewer L, van Trijp H (ed). Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, England (2007)
|
22 |
Sobal J, Bisogni CA, Devine CM, Jastran M. A conceptual model of the food choice process over the life course. pp. 1-18. In: The Psychology of Food Choice. Shepherd R, Raats M (ed). CABI, Oxfordshire, UK (2006)
|
23 |
Stone H, Bleibaum RN, Thomas HA. Sensory evaluation practices. 4th ed. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (2012)
|
24 |
Lutz RJ, Kakkar P. The psychological situation as a determinant of consumer behavior. ACR North American Advances. 439-454 (1975)
|