1 |
Nabors OL, Gelardi RC. 1. Introduction. pp. 1-14, 5. Acesulfam- K. pp. 89-102. In: Alternative Sweeteners. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, USA (1985)
|
2 |
Schiffman SS, Sattely-Miller EA, Graham BG, Zervakis J, Butchko HH, Stargel WW. Effect of repeated presentation on sweetness intensity of binary and ternary mixtures of sweeteners. Chem. Senses 28: 219-229 (2003)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Baron RF, Hanger LY. Using acid level, acesulfame, potassium/ aspartame blend ratio, and flavor type to determine optimum flavor profiles of fruit flavored beverages. J. Sen. Stud. 13: 269-283 (1998)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Tornout V, Pelgroms J, Meeren VD. Sweetness evaluation of mixtures of fructose with saccharin, aspartame or acesulfame K. J. Food Sci. 50: 469-472 (1985)
DOI
|
5 |
Grand-Grant MJ, Hsieh G. Reported use of reduced-sugar foods and beverages reflect high-quality diets. J. Food Sci. 70: S42-S46(2005)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Iop SCF, Silva RSF, Beleia AP. Formulation and evaluation of dry dessert mix containing sweetener combinations using mixture response methodology. Food Chem. 66: 167-171 (1999)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Birch GG. Towards an improved understanding of sweetener synergy. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 7: 403-407 (1996)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Hyvonen L, Torma R. Examination of sugars, sugar alcohols, and artificial sweeteners as substitutes for sucrose in strawberry jam product development. J. Food Sci. 48: 183-187 (1983)
DOI
|
9 |
Schiffman SS, Booth BJ, Carr BT, Losee ML, Sattely-Miller EA, Graham BG. Investigation of synergism in binary mixtures of sweeteners. Brain Res. Bull. 38: 105-120 (1995)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Lee SY, Kim KO. Sensory characteristics of baekseolgi (Korean traditional rice cakes) containing combined sweeteners. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 18: 503-504 (1986)
과학기술학회마을
|
11 |
Nahon DF, Roozen JP, Graaf CD. Sweetness flavour interactions on soft drinks. Food Chem. 56: 283-289 (1996)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Goff DH, Jordan WK. Aspartame and polydextrose in a caloricreduced frozen dairy dessert. J. Food Sci. 49: 306-307 (1984)
DOI
|
13 |
Ayya N, Lawless HT. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of high-intensity sweeteners and sweeteners mixtures. Chem. Senses 17: 245-259 (1992)
DOI
|
14 |
Giese JH. Alterantive sweeteners and bulking agents. Food Technol.-Chicago 47: 114-126 (1993)
|
15 |
Portmann MO, Kilcast D. Descriptive profiles of synergistic mixtures of bulk and intense sweeteners. Food Qual. Prefer. 9: 221- 229 (1998)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Barndt RL, Jackson G. Stability of sucralose in baked goods. Food Technol.-Chicago 44: 62-66 (1990)
|
17 |
Kim MY, Cho HY, Lee SM, Suh DS, Chung SJ, Kim HS, Kim KO. Relative sweeteness of sucralose in beverage systems and sensory properties of low calorie beverage containing sucralose. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 37: 425-430 (2005)
과학기술학회마을
|
18 |
Schiffman SS, Crofton VA, Beeker TG. Sensory evaluation of soft drinks with various sweeteners. Physiol. Behav. 34: 369-377 (1985)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Kim KO, O'Mahony M. A new approach to category scales of intensity I: Traditional versus rank-rating. J. Sen. Stud. 13: 241- 249 (1998)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Jenner MR, Smithson A. Physicochmical properties of the sweetener sucralose. J. Food Sci. 54: 1646-1649 (1989)
DOI
|
21 |
Nam SJ, Kim KO. Characteristics of sikhye (Korean traditional drink) made with different amount of cooked rice and malt and with different sweeteners. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 21: 197- 202 (1989)
과학기술학회마을
|
22 |
Powers NL, Pangborn RM. Descriptive analysis of the sensory properties of beverages and gelatins containing sucrose or synthetic sweeteners. J. Food Sci. 43: 47-51 (1978)
DOI
|
23 |
Hanger LY, Lotz A, Lepeniotis S. Descriptive profiles of selected high intensity sweeteners (HIS), HIS blends, and sucrose. J. Food Sci. 61: 456-464 (1996)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Redlinger PA, Setser CS. Sensory quality of selected sweeteners: aqueous and lipid model systems. J. Food Sci. 52: 451-454 (1987)
DOI
|
25 |
Matysiak NL, Noble AC. Comparison of temporal perception of fruitiness on model systems sweetened with aspartame, and aspartame + acesulfam k blend, of sucrose. J. Food Sci. 56: 823- 826 (1991)
DOI
|
26 |
Verdi R, Hood LL. Advantages of alternative sweetener blends. Food Technol.-Chicago 47: 94-100 (1993)
|
27 |
ADA reports. Position of the american dietetic association: Use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 104: 255-275 (2004)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Wiet SG, Beyt P. Sensory characteristics of sucralose and other high intensity sweeteners. J. Food Sci. 57: 1014-1019 (1992)
DOI
|
29 |
Ott DB, Edwards CL, Palmer SJ. Perceived taste intensity and duration of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in water using time-intensity (T-I) evaluations. J. Food Sci. 56: 535-541 (1991)
DOI
|
30 |
Kim KJ, Chae YK. Effects of kinds of starch and sweetener on the quality characteristics of kamgyulpyun. Korean J. Soc. Food Sci. 14: 20-56 (1998)
|
31 |
Quinlan ME, Jenner MR. Analysis and stability of the sweetner sucralose in beverage. J. Food Sci. 55: 254-256 (1990)
DOI
|
32 |
Frugia AM, Goerl AJ, McMurry M, Hagan DW. Acesulfam-K more acceptable than sucralose in baked products. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 101: A-24 (2001)
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Schiffman SS, Sattely-Miller EA, Graham BG, Booth BJ, Gibes KM. Synergism among ternary mixtures of fourteen sweeteners. Chem. Senses 25: 131-140 (2000)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Mendonca CR, Zambiazi R, Granada GG. Partial substitution of sugars by the low-calorie sweetener sucralose in peach compote. J. Food Sci. 66: 1195-1200 (2001)
|