Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2016.26.3.301

Comparative Analysis between Direct-reading Meter of PID and GC-FID using the Active Type Air Sampler for VOCs Measurement  

Yeo, Jin-Hee (Samsung Health Research Institute, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.)
Choi, Kwang-Min (Samsung Health Research Institute, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene / v.26, no.3, 2016 , pp. 301-306 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: Direct-reading instrument(Photoionization detectors, PID) and quantitative analysis using active type air sampling (Gas chromatography-flame ionization detector, GC-FID) were tested to evaluate their ability to detect volatile organic compounds(VOCs) in a semiconductor manufacturing plant. Methods: The organic compounds used were acetone and ethanol which are normally used as cleaning solutions in the semiconductor manufacturing. The evaluation was based on the preparation of test solutions of known acetone and ethanol concentration in a chamber($600{\times}600{\times}1150mm$). Samples were prepared that would be equivalent to 5~100 ppm for acetone and 10~ 200 ppm ethanol. GC-FID and PID were evaluated simultaneously. Quantitative analysis was performed after sampling and the direct-reading instrument was checked using real-time data logging. Results: Positive correlations between PID and GC-FID were found for acetone and ethanol at 0.04~2.4% for acetone(TLV: 500 ppm) and 0.1~8.3% for ethanol(TLV: 1000 ppm). When the sampling time was 15 min, concentration of test solution was the most similar between measurement methods. However, the longer the sampling time, the less similar the results. PID and GC-FID had similar exposure patterns. Conclusions: The results indicate that PID and GC-FID have similar exposure pattern and positive correlation for detection of acetone and ethanol. Therefore, PID can be used for exposure monitoring for VOCs in the semiconductor manufacturing industry. This study has significance in that it validates measuring occupational exposure using a portable device.
Keywords
GC-FID; PID; semiconductor; volatile organic compounds;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Coffey CC, Pearce TA, Lawrence RB, Hudnall JB, Slaven JE et al. Measurement capability of field portable organic vapor monitoring instruments under different experimental conditions. J Occup Environ Hyg 2008; 6(1):1-8   DOI
2 Coffey CC, Pearce TA. Direct-reading methods for workplace air monitoring. J Chemical Health & Safety 2010;17(3):10-21   DOI
3 Coffey CC, Lebouf R, Lee L, Slaven J, Martin S. Effect of calibration and environmental condition on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors. J Occup Environ Hyg 2012;9(11):670-680   DOI
4 Coy JD, Bigelow PL, Buchan RM, Tessari JD, Parnell JO. Field evaluation of a portable photoionization detector for assessing exposure to solvent mixtures. American Industrial Hygiene Association. 2000;61(2):268-274   DOI
5 Duarte K, Justino CIL, Freitas AC, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos TAP. Direct-reading methods for analysis of volatile organic compounds and nanoparticles in workplace air. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2014;53:21-32   DOI
6 Hori H, Ishimatsu S, Fueta Y, Hinoue M, Ishidaol T. Comparison of sensor characteristics of three real-time monitors for organic vapors. Japan Society for Occupational Health 2015;57(1):13-19   DOI
7 NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods 1400. ALCOHOLS I. 1994
8 Park DU, Byun HJ, Choi SJ, Jumng JY, Yoon CS et al. Review on potential risk factors in wafer fabrication process of semiconductor industry. J Korean occup Environ Med 2011;23(3):333-342
9 R.A.E System. Theory and applications of Direct-Reding Photoiozation Detector(PID), first ed. 2002
10 R.A.E System, ppb RAE 3000 User's Guide. Rae System. 2007
11 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). METHOD 21. 1995
12 Choi KM, Lee JE, Cho KY, Kim KS, Cho SH. Clean room structure, air conditioning and contamination control systems in the semiconductor fabrication process. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2015;25(2):202-210   DOI