Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2016.26.3.293

A study on the Application Status to Trade Secret of GHS MSDSs distributed in the Workplaces and its Improvement Measures  

Lee, Kwon Seob (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency)
Lee, Hye Jin (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency)
Hong, Mun Ki (Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene / v.26, no.3, 2016 , pp. 293-300 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: This study is designed to survey the current status of trade secrets in GHS MSDS circulated in workplaces and indicate problems in the chemical information system. According to the survey results, we suggest management plans including political improvement of the trade secret system for MSDS and technical support to workplaces following enhanced chemical communication. Methods: To review this subject, we selected 153 manufacturers and six importers working in such fields as organic chemical production. We then investigated the retention status of GHS MSDS, application of trade secrets, and the content of trade secret components in MSDSs for mixtures. Results and Conclusions: Within the results, the content of trade secret ingredients was 67.4% (single: 9.0%, mixture: 75.6%). This is an increase compared with the previous results of 45.5% in 2011. Among 59,393 GHS MSDSs, 74.5% had ingredients less than 10% trade secret components, 19.1% had 10-30%, 1.8% had 30-50%, and 4.6% had more than 50%. To settle this issue, we recommend registration or evaluation of trade secrets as implemented in advanced countries. Also, business should be required to undergo regular evaluations of application status for trade secrets in workplace GHS MSDS.
Keywords
chemical communication; chemical information; GHS MSDS; trade secret;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 American Chemical Society(ACS). CHEMLIST(Regulated Chemicals). 2016.9. Avalilable from: http://www.cas.org/ index.html
2 European Commission(EC). Proposal for a regulation on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures: Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals(GHS) and its incorporation into community legislation(Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008). 2008
3 European Union(EU) European Chemicals Agency(ECHA). Regulation(EC) No 1907/2006 of The European Parliament and of the and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Official Journal of the European Union. 2007
4 Health Canada. Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, HMIRA). 2016
5 Hong MK, Song SW, Lee KS, Choi SB, Lee JH. A Study of MSDS Reliability Evaluation in Chemicals including Formaldehyde. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2013: 23(3):287-298
6 Lee KS, Choi JH, Jo JH, Choi SB, Lee JH et al. MSDSs Reliability Evaluation in Workplaces Manufacturing Aromatic Hydrocarbon. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2009;19(4): 370-380
7 Lee KS, Han IS, Han JH, Park DU, Lee DW et al. A Study on the Chemical Composition and MSDS Reliability of Powder Coatings. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2004;14(3): 221-232
8 Lee KS, Jo JH, Park JW, Song SW. Analysis on the Legal Control Levels and GHS Classification Information Status for Strongly Acidic Hazardous Materials. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2013;23(4):384-392
9 Lee KS, Lee JH, Lee HJ. A Study on the Criteria and Supply Status of Information for Managing Carcinogens in Domestic and Foreign. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2011;21(1): 40-48
10 Lee KS, Jo JH, Park JW, Song SW. Analysis on the Legal Control Levels and GHS Classification Information Status for Strongly Acidic Hazardous Materials. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2005;15(1):52-60
11 Korean Intellectual Property Office(KIPO). Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act. 2014
12 Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Enforcement Rule of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. 2016a
13 Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Occupational Safety and Health Act. 2016b
14 Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Standard for Classification, Labeling of Chemical Substance and Material Safety Data Sheet (MoEL Public Notice No. 2016-19). 2016c
15 Ministry Of Environment(MoE). Chemicals Control Act. 2016a
16 Ministry Of Environment(MoE). Enforcement Rule of the Act on Registration, Evaluation, etc. of Chemicals. 2016b
17 Park JH, Ham SH, Kim SJ, Lee KS, Ha KC. Study on the Chemical Management - 1. Chemical Characteristics and Occupational Exposure Limits under Occupational Safety and Health Act of Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2015;25(1):45-57   DOI
18 United National(UN). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemical(GHS). St/Sg/Ac.10/30/Rev.6, 2015
19 United Nations Environmental Programme(UNEP). Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) - Report of the international conference on chemical management on the work of its fist session. SAICM/ICCM.1/7. 2006
20 United States Environmental Protection Agency(US EPA). Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). 1986