Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2014.24.4.453

Characteristics of Size-segregated Mass Concentrations of Indoor Aerosol Particles in University Buildings  

Suh, Jeong-Min (Department of Bio-Environmental Energy, Pusan National University)
Wang, Bin (Department of Bio-Environmental Energy, Pusan National University)
Jang, Seong-Ho (Department of Bio-Environmental Energy, Pusan National University)
Park, Jeong-Ho (Department of Environmental Engineering, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Choi, Kum-Chan (Department of Environmental Engineering, Dong-A University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene / v.24, no.4, 2014 , pp. 453-461 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: Based on the fact that fine particles are more likely to produce negative influences on the health of occupants as well as the quality of indoor air compared to coarse particles, it is critical to determine concentrations of aerosol particles with different sizes. Thus, this study focused on the size distribution and concentrations of aerosol particles in university buildings. Method: Aerosol particles in indoor air were collected from four areas: corridors in buildings(In-CO), lecture rooms(In-RO), laboratories(In-LR), and a cafeteria(In-RE). Samples were also collected from outside for comparison between the concentrations of indoor and outdoor particles. For the collection of the samples, an eight stage non-viable cascade impactor was used. Result: The average concentration of $PM_{10}$ in the samples collected from indoor areas was $34.65-91.08{\mu}g/m^3$,and the average for $PM_{2.5}$ was $22.65-60.40{\mu}g/m^3$. The concentrations of the aerosol particles in the corridors, lecture rooms, and laboratories were relatively higher than the concentrations collected from other areas. Furthermore, in terms of mass median aerodynamic diameter(MMAD), the corridors and lecture rooms had higher numbers due to their characteristics, showing $2.36{\mu}m$ and $2.11{\mu}m$, respectively. Laboratories running an electrolysis experiment showed $1.58{\mu}m$, and the cafeteria with regular maintenance and ventilation had $1.96{\mu}m$. Conclusion: The results showed that the $PM_{10}$ concentrations of all samples did not exceed indoor air quality standards. However, the $PM_{2.5}$ concentration was over the standard and, in particular, the concentration of fine particles collected from the laboratories was relatively higher, which could be an issue for the occupants. Therefore, it is important to improve the quality of the indoor air in university buildings.
Keywords
cascade impactor; indoor aerosol particle; MMAD; university building;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bau S, Witschger O. A modular tool for analyzing cascade impactors data to improve exposure assessment to airborne nanomaterials. J Phys Conf. Ser. 2013;429:1-10
2 Carlton AG, Turpin JB, Johnson W, Buckley BT, Simcik M et al. Methods for characterization of personal aerosol exposures. Aerosol Sci Technol 1999;31(66):66-80   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Donaldson K, Li XY, MacNee W. Ultrafine(nanometer) particle mediated lung injury. J Aerosol Sci 1998;29 (5/6):553-560   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Hinds WC. Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1982. p. 120-150
5 Kavouras IG, Stephanou EG. Gas/particle partitioning and size distribution of primary and secondary carbonaceous aerosols in public buildings. Indoor air 2002;12:17-32   DOI
6 Kim JH, Lee TJ, Kim DS. Investigation of indoor air quality and the characteristics of particulate matter distribution in a university library. J Korean Soc Indoor Environ 2008;5(1):24-36
7 Lee CM, Kim YS. Analysis of research trend for indoor air pollutants and health risk assessment in public facilities. J Korean Soc Indoor Environ 2004;1(1):39-60
8 Lee SC, Chang M. Indoor and outdoor air quality investigation at schools in Hong Kong. Chemosphere 2000;41:109-113   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Meng QY, Turpin BJ, Korn L, Weisel CP, Morandi M et al. Influence of ambient(outdoor) sources on residential indoor and personal $PM_{2.5}$ concentrations: analyses of RIOPA data. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2005; 15:17-28   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Ministry of Environment(MoE). Risk assessment and management technology - A risk analysis of indoor/ outdoor airborne fine particles : Based on environmental epidemiological research. Report, 091-041-032; 2008. p.10
11 Ministry of Environment(MoE). Indoor air quality guideline Act; 2014.
12 Montgomery DD. Kalman DA, Indoor/outdoor air quality: Reference concentrations in complaint free residences. Appl. Ind. Hyg. 1989;4:17-20   DOI
13 Nam MR. Exposure assessment of $PM_{10}$ and $PM_{2.5}$ in office buildings. Master's Thesis, Daegu Haany University, Daegu, Korea; 2013. p.20
14 Roberts DL, Mitchell JP. The effect of nonideal cascade impactor stage collection efficiency curves on the interpretation of the size of inhaler-generated aerosols. AAPS PharmSciTech 2013;14(2):497-510   DOI
15 O'Shaughnessy PT, Raabe OG. A comparison of cascade impactor data reduction methods. Aerosol Sci Technol 2003;37:187-200   DOI
16 Park JH, Choi KC. Characterization of chemical composition and size distribution of atmospheric aerosols by low-pressure impactor. J KOSAE 1997;13(6):475-486   과학기술학회마을
17 Qian J, Hospodsky D, Yamamoto N, Nazaroff WW, Peccia J. Size-resolved emission rates of airborne bacteria and fungi in an occupied classroom. Indoor Air 2012;22: 339-351   DOI
18 Sienfeld JH, Pandis SN. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1998. p. 408-447
19 Uhde E, Salthammer T. Impact of reaction products from building materials and furnishings on indoor air quality - A review of recent advances in indoor chemistry. Atmos Environ 2007;41:3111-3128   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Vaughan NP. The Andersen impactor: Calibration, wall losses and numerical simulation. J Aerosol Sci 1989; 20(1):67-90   DOI
21 Whitby KT. The physical characteristics of sulfur aerosols. Atmos. Environ. 1978;12:135-159   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Willeke K, Whitby KT. Atmospheric Aerosols: Size Distribution Interpretation. J Air Poll Cont Assoc 1975;25:529-534   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Won SR, Lim JY, Shim IK, Kim EJ, Choi AR et al. Characterization of $PM_{2.5}$ and $PM_{10}$ concentration distribution at public facilities in Korea. J Korean Soc Indoor Environ 2012;9(3):229-238