Browse > Article

Laboratory Evaluation of the Accuracy, Precision, and Inter-instrumental Variance of a Portable Photoionization Detector  

Choi, Dongmin (Department of Environmental Health Science, Soonchunhyang University)
Choi, Youngeun (Department of Environmental Health Science, Soonchunhyang University)
Yoon, Chungsik (Department of Environmental Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
Rhie, Kwangwon (Department of Safety Health Engineering, Hoseo University)
Lee, Yunkeun (Wonjin Institute of Occupational and Environmental Health)
Lee, Ikmo (Department of Chemistry, Inha University)
Park, Jeongim (Department of Environmental Health Science, Soonchunhyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene / v.22, no.3, 2012 , pp. 200-208 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: This study investigated the performance of three separate units of a portable photoionization detector (PID, ppb-RAE 3000) for measuring volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a laboratory. Methods: A laboratory evaluation of the accuracy, precision, and inter-instrumental variance of three separate units of a portable PID (ppb-RAE 3000) was performed. The evaluation was based on the preparation of a test air sample of known toluene or ethylacetate concentration in a Tedlar$^{(R)}$ bag. The test air sample was monitored and data were logged consecutively by the three PIDs. A certified gas of 50 ppm toluene was also monitored during the test to ensure the reliability of the generated test air sample. Four different concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 2 TLV were used and a series of five measurements for each concentration level was performed. The accuracy was evaluated using National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) criteria. Results: The results from the oldest ppb-RAE3000 unit among the three test units generally fell outside the NIOSH recommended accuracy criteria of ${\pm}25%$, whereas the other two units produced results which were acceptable at, or greater than, 25 ppm of toluene, or 0.5 TLV. These units also met the NIOSH criteria for some ethylacetate measurements but the results were not consistent. Conclusions: Considering the inconsistent performance of these ppb-RAE 3000 units, this device may not be appropriate for use as an alternative to the standard measurement methods. However, it can serve good survey instruments to identify exposure sources or concentration profiles. For all applications, the ppb-RAE 3000 should be used with frequent calibration checks, additional validation using a reference material, and careful maintenance.
Keywords
Portable Photoionization Detector; Evaluation; Accuracy; Calibration;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김광종, 김정만, 김태형, 김현욱, 노영만 외. 산업위생. 신광출판사; 2004. (p. 415-416)
2 Barsky JB, QUE HEE SS, Clark CS. An evaluation of the response of some portable, direct-reading 10.2 eV and 11.8 eV photoionization detectors, and a flame ionization gas chromatograph for organic vapors in high humidity atmospheres. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1985; 46 (1): 9-14   DOI
3 Coffey CC, Pearce TA, Lawrence RB, Hudnall JB, Slaven JE, Martin SB Jr. Measurement capability of field portable organic vapor monitoring instruments under different experimental conditions. J Occup Environ Hyg 2009; 6 (1): 1-8
4 Coy JD, Bigelow PL, Buchan RM, Tessari JD, Parnell JO. Field evaluation of a portable photoionization detector for assessing exposure to solvent mixtures. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2000; 61 (2): 268-274   DOI
5 Drummond I. On-the-fly calibration of direct reading photoionization detectors. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1997; 58 (11): 820-822   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Diaz K, McDermott HJ. A cost-effective method for evaluating the accuracy of direct reading instruments for specific hydrocarbon vapors. In American Industrial Hygiene Association Conference and Exposition (May 21-27) Abstracts. Fairfax, VA. American Industrial Hygiene Association and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1994: 93
7 Kennedy ER, Fischbach TJ, Song R, Eller PM, Shulman SA. Guidelines for air sampling and analytical method development and evaluation. A NIOSH Technical Report, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1995
8 Kauppila TJ, Bruins AP. Effect of the solvent flow rate on the ionization efficiency in atmospheric pressure photoionization-mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2005; 16 (8): 1399-1407   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Lee IN, QUE HEE SS, Clark CS. Additivity of detector responses of a portable direct-reading 10.2eV Photoionization Detector and a flame ionization gas chromatograph for atmospheres of multicomponent organics: Use of PID/FID ratios. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1987; 48 (5): 437-441   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Nelson GO. Gas Mixtures: Preparation and Control. Lewis Publishers, Inc.; 1992. p. 85-89
11 Nyquist JE, Wilson DL, Norman LA, Gammage RB. Decreased sensitivity of photoionization detector total organic vapor detectors in the presence of methane. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1990; 51 (6): 326-330   DOI   ScienceOn
12 RAE System. ppb RAE 3000 User's Guide. RAE System. 2007
13 Smith PA, Lepage CJ, Harrer KL, Brochu PJ. Hand-Held Photoionization instruments for quantitative detection of sarin vapor and for rapid qualitative screening of contaminated objects. J Occup Environ Hyg 2007; 4 (10): 729-38   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Todd L. Direct-reading instruments for determining concentrations of gages, vapors and aerosols. In: Daniel HA editors. The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd ed. Virginia: American Industrial Hygiene Association; 2011. p. 425-429
15 Upton C. Radiation. in: Frumkin H. editors. Environmental Health: from global to local, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2010. P. 770
16 Verma DK, Saunders GA, Cheng WK. A laboratory evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the photovac snapshot portable gas chromatograph and the dräger chip measurement system monitor for benzene in air measurements. J Occup Environ Hyg 2001; 16 (8): 832-840   DOI   ScienceOn