Study on the new approaching method to determine limit of detection by gas chromatography |
Oh, Doe-Suk
(Environmental Analysis and Consulting Co. Ltd.)
Shin, Kyoung-Ae (Environmental Analysis and Consulting Co. Ltd.) Lee, Ji-A (Environmental Analysis and Consulting Co. Ltd.) Lym, Jong-Ho (Environmental Analysis and Consulting Co. Ltd.) Shin, Mi-Sun (Environmental Analysis and Consulting Co. Ltd.) |
1 | Mocak J, Bond AM, Mitchell S, Scollary G. A Statistical overview of standard (iupac and acs) and new procedures for determining the limits of detection and quantification: application to voltametric and stripping techniques. Pure & Appl Chem 1997;69(2):298. |
2 | Jardy VA. Experimental comparison of the different approaches to estimate LOD and LOQ of an HPLC method. Anal Chem 1999;71:2677-2772. |
3 | William RP. Proper statistical evaluation of calibration data. Anal Chem 1983;55(13):1290. DOI |
4 | 오도석. 콘센트레이티드 크로마토그라피, 지산; 2002(47-56쪽). |
5 | 김하석,이후성,채명준. 분석화학. 동화기술; 1988. |
6 | MacDoughal D. Guidelines for data acquisition and data quality evaluation in environmental chemistry. Anal Chem 1980;52:2242. DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Lawrence H. Principles of environmental analysis. Anal Chem 1983;55:2217. |
8 | Poole CP, Schuette SA. Contemporary practice of chromatography. Elsevier 1984;385-389. |
9 | Apostol I, Miller K, Ratto J, Kelner D. Comparison of different approaches for evaluation of the detection and quantitation limits of a quantity method: A case study using a capillary isoelectrofocusing method for a monoclonal antibody Analytical Biochemistry 2009;385:101-106. DOI ScienceOn |
10 | Sevcik J, Lips JE. Meaning of GC detector characteristics chromatography. 1979;12(10):69. DOI |