Browse > Article

Evaluation of Airflow Control Capability of Natural Ventilators with Various Dampers  

Kim, Tae-Hyeong (Department of Environmental Engineering Changwon National University)
Ha, Hyun-Chul (VENTECH Corp)
Park, Seung-Chul (Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd.)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene / v.16, no.4, 2006 , pp. 364-374 More about this Journal
Abstract
Natural ventilation technique could be the substitute for or the complement to the local exhaust ventilation system in the sense of protecting work environment. Moreover, it has many strong points ; almost no mechanical parts, no energy use and no noise. If applied appropriately, it could have the very high ventilation rate and save a lot of energy expense. But, it depends on the outdoor environment, especially temperature and wind speed/direction. Predicting the capacity of natural ventilation is not an easy job because it comes from both buoyancy and wind effect. Another problem is too much flow through the ventilator especially in winter time due to too much difference between indoor and outdoor temperature. Thus some ventilators in industries are sealed by door or plastic sheet, resulting in bad work environment. Various types of dampers are used to control the flow rate through ventilators. The capabilities of flow control by damper has not been estimated. In addition, it was not tested whether the damper could obstruct the flow through ventilator when fully opened. To answer these questions, 4 types of dampers were tested by using computational fluid dynamics. 10 different configurations includes no damper, full open and half open. Flow rates were estimated and airflow fields were analysed to clarify the before-mentioned questions. The dual type damper was the best choice for controling the capability of ventilator. In addition, the upward grill type damper was the best for not obstructing the air flow when fully opened.
Keywords
Natural ventilation; Gravity ventilator; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Damper; Flow control capability;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 명현국. 수치유체공학. 한미; 1997.(163-179쪽.)
2 성산 ENG. 제품홍보책자; 2004
3 하현철. 자연환기 벤틸레이터 환기효율 평가 및 환기량 산정. 창원대학교;2002.(1-4쪽.)
4 Boulard T, Kittas C, Papadakis G, Mermier M. Pressure field and airflow at the opening of a naturally ventilated greenhouse. J Agric Engng Res. 1998; 71:93-102   DOI   ScienceOn
5 하현철, 김태형. 자연환기 벤틸레이터 형태에 따른 환기효율 평가. 설비공학회논문집, 2002(c);14(7):543-551
6 이재헌. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. 대한 교과서 주식회사; 1997.(16-17쪽.)
7 하현철, 정유진, 김태형. 일반형 자연환기 벤틸레이터 배기유 량 산정. 한국산업위생학회지 2002(a);12(1):27-34
8 하현철, 김태형. 자연환기 벤틸레이터 형태에 따른 환기 특 성. 한국산업위생학회지 2002(b);12(1):35-45
9 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists : Industrial Ventilation a Manual of Recommended Practice 25th Edition, 2004. p. 10:1-2
10 건축법시행령 제 51조 2항; 1994. 12. 23. 개정