Browse > Article

Mechanical Properties of DLP-type Dental 3D Printing Temporary Tooth Material  

Jung, Hyo-Kyung (Department of Dental Technology Daegu Health College)
Lee, Seung-Hee (Department of Dental Technology Daegu Health College)
Jung, Hyo-Kyung (Department of Dental Technology Daegu Health College)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Industry Convergence / v.24, no.3, 2021 , pp. 373-376 More about this Journal
Abstract
Tested the flexural strength and maximum load of two types of dental 3 D printed temporary tooth materials of the DLP method. The average flexural strength was 206.98 MPa in the test group and 139.77 MPa in the control group. The average flexural strength of the experimental group was 67.21 MPa higher than that of the control group. In the maximum load experiment, an average of 44.16N in the experimental group and 37.31N in the control group were measured. The average value of 6.85N was higher in the experimental group, and the durability of the artificial tooth restoration was improved.
Keywords
Dental 3D Printer; DLP type; Temporary tooth; Mechanical properties;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Alt V, Hannig M, Wostmann B, Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater 2011;27:339-47.   DOI
2 Lee S. Prospect for 3D printing technology in medical, dental, and pediatric dental field. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2016;43:93-108.
3 Barazanchi A, Li KC, Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Waddell JN. Additive technology: update on current materials and applications in dentistry. J Prosthodont. 2017;26: 156-63.   DOI
4 Osman RB, Alharbi N, Wismeijer D. Build angle: Does it influence the accuracy of 3D-printed dental restorations using digital light-processing technology Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30:182-8.   DOI
5 Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3Dprinted complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:760-7.   DOI
6 Barazanchi A, Li KC, Al Amleh B, Lyons K, Wad dell JN. Additive technology: update on current materials and applications in dentistry. J Prosthodont 2017;26:156-63.   DOI
7 ISO 10477:2018 Dentistry-Polymer-based crown and veneering materials, Geneva, 2018.
8 Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016;32(1):54-64.   DOI
9 Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athi rasala A, Pfeifer CS, et al. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34:192-200.   DOI
10 Lee S. Prospect for 3D printing technology in medical, dental, and pediatric dental field. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2016;43:93-108.
11 Louvrier A, Marty P, Barrabe A, Euvrard E, Chatelain B, Weber E, Meyer C. How useful is 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery?. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 150. 2017;118:206-12.   DOI
12 Bagheri A, Jin J. Photopolymerization in 3D printing. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2019;1:593-611.   DOI
13 Nakata T, Shimpo H, Ohkubo C. Clasp fabrica tion using one-process molding by repeated laser sintering and high-speed milling. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:276-82.   DOI