Browse > Article

Effects of Workplace Noise and Hearing Protective Devices on Worker's Speech Intelligibility  

Park, Hyoung-Ouk (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital)
Sim, Chang-Sun (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital)
Kwon, Joong-Keun (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital)
Kim, Kyoo-Sang (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency)
Kwon, Young-Joo (Department of Occupational Health Center, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea)
Kim, Nam-Jeong (Department of Occupational Health Center, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea)
Seo, Min-Suk (Department of Occupational Health Center, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea)
Lee, Ji-Ho (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital)
Publication Information
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine / v.22, no.2, 2010 , pp. 154-165 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the degree of intelligible speech in workers wearing hearing protective devices and the differences in background noise type. Methods: A total 82 shipyard company employees and normal hearing volunteers were recruited as subjects from a company in Ulsan: subjects were classified to the hearing-impaired group or to the control group according to hearing status. They were tested pure tone and speech audiometry in varying test environments including signal-to-noise ratio and background noise type in a headphone and in a free field environment. Results: For both groups, the attenuation of hearing protective devices was greater at high frequencies. For the hearing-impaired group, speech discrimination scores differences between the unprotected and the protected ear were not significant between background noise type, when speech was presented at 65 dBA. However speech intelligibility in white noise background was lower than in the other background noise types when speech was presented at 75 dBA. Conclusions: Workers' speech intelligibility increased with an increasing signal-to-noise ratio. Speech intelligibility was also dependent on background noise type. Workers and their colleagues were trained to pronounce words more loudly and more clearly when they wearing hearing protective devices or other communication methods that do not use sound signal should be considered.
Keywords
Speech intelligibility; Noise; Hearing protective devices;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Junqua JC. The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;93(1):510-24.   DOI
2 Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA). Standards for Pure Tone Audiometric Testing KOSHA Code h-13-2006(translated by Park HO). KOSHA. Incheon. 2006. (Korean)
3 Lee SH, Shim HJ, Yoon SW, Lee KW. Effects of various background noise on speech intelligibility of normal hearing subjects. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2009;52(4):307-11. (Korean)   DOI
4 Abel SM, Alberti PW, Haythornthwaite C, Riko K. Speech intelligibility in noise: Effects of fluency and hearing protector type. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;71:708-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Abel SM, Alberti PW, Riko K. Speech intelligibility in noise with ear protectors. J Otolaryngol 1980;9:256-65.
6 Hahm TY. Korean word list for speech audiometry and results of articulation test. Journal of Catholic Medical College 1962;6:31-6. (Korean)
7 Chung DY, Gannon RT. The effect of ear protectors on word discrimination in subject with normal hearing and subjects with noise-induced hearing loss. J Am Aud Soc 1979;5(1):11-6.
8 Franks JR, Stephenson MR, Merry CJ. Preventing occupational hearing loss-a practical guide. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-110 [cited 18 February 2010].
9 Berger EH. Hearing Protection Devices. In: Berger EH (eds) The noise manual. 5th ed. American Industrial Hygiene Association United States of America. Indianapolis. 2000. pp 419-20.
10 Lindeman HE. Speech intelligibility and the use of hearing protectors. Audiology 1976;15:348-56.   DOI
11 Abel SM, Spencer DL. Active noise reduction versus conventional hearing protection. Relative benefits for normal-hearing and impaired listeners. Scand Audiol 1997;26(3):155-67.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Moon SK, Kim SH, Mun HA, Jung HK, Lee JH, Choung YH, Park K. The Korean hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol 2008;47:375-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Howell K, Martin AM. An investigation of the effects of hearing protectors on vocal communication in noise. J Sound Vib 1975;41(2):181-96.   DOI
14 Pollack I. Speech communications at high noise levels: The roles of a noise-operated automatic gain control system and hearing protection. J Acoust Soc Am 1957;29:1324-7.   DOI
15 Lyregaard PE. Frequency selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol Suppl 1982;15:113-22.
16 Hahm TY. Complementary study on construction of Korean word lists for speech audiometry. Journal of Inje Medical College 1986;7:1-19. (Korean)
17 Korean Audiological Society. Practical manual of hearing tests. Hakjisa. Seoul. 2008. pp 107-8. (Korean)
18 American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. ANSI S3.1-1999. New york. 1999.
19 Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:1085-99.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Webster JC. The effects of noise on the hearing of speech. Proceedings of the International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Yugoslavia, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 550/9-73-008 1973;25-42.
21 Kuzniarz JJ. Hearing loss and speech intelligibility in noise. Proceedings of the International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Yugoslavia, EPA 550/9-73-008 1973;57-71.
22 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational noise exposure revised criteria. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/98-126 [cited 18 February 2010].
23 Morata TC, Fiorini AC, Fischer FM, Krieg EF, Gozzoli L, Colacioppo S. Factors affecting the use of hearing protectors in a population of printing workers. Noise Health 2001;4:25-32.
24 Helmkamp JS. Why workers do not use hearing protection? Occ Health Saf 1986;55:52.
25 Kryter KD. Effects of ear protective devices on the intelligibility of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1946;18:413-7.   DOI