Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.21186/IPR.2017.2.1.107

Britain will go after the European Union  

yushu, Zhou (Inner Mongolia Normal University Hongde College)
Wyrwoll, Thomas W. (UNESCO International Petroleum Commission)
Publication Information
Industry Promotion Research / v.2, no.1, 2017 , pp. 107-111 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper focuses on the development prospects of the UK after Europe, the development situation of the EU and the world's democratic issues were discussed. Professor Zhou Yushu that the old EU pattern may no longer be suitable for contemporary development trends, the need for reform and create a new pattern of mutual benefit and win-win situation. Professor Thomas believes that the impact of Britain's departure from Europe should be viewed from a dialectical perspective, and the benefits and disadvantages of China's economic development plan will be positive for the economic development of Europe as a whole. With the common development of China.
Keywords
Britain off Europe; the EU; along the way; democracy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Akbar, Yusaf H., The Multinational Enterprise, EU Enlargement and Central Europe, Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
2 Allison, Graham T., Essence of Decision: Explaining the Alter, Karen J., Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
3 Bulmer, Simon J., British Devolution and European Policy-making: Transforming Britain into Multi-level Governance, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
4 Campanella, Miriam L., EU Economic Governance and Globalization, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 2003, pp. 1-30.
5 Caporaso, James A, The European Union Dilemmas of Regional Integration Boulder, Westview Press, 2000.
6 De Burca, Grainne, The Constitutional Limits of EU Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
7 Elsig, Manfred., The EU's Common Commercial Policy: Institutions, Interests, and Ideas, Ashgate, 2002. Farrell, Mary et al., European Integration in the 21st Century, London: SAGE, 2002.
8 Frohlich, Stefan, Difficulties of EU Governance, Peter Lang Inc, 2004.
9 Greenwood, Justin, Interest Representation in the European Union, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
10 Guarnieri, Carlo, et al., The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Court and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 160-181.
11 Nature Physics(2014), "British science needs free movement", 10(12), 891-891.   DOI
12 Guibernau, Montserrat (ed.), Governing European Diversity, London: SAGE, 2001.
13 Halberstam, Daniel, The Bridge of Messina or European Democracy and the Limits ofLiberal Intergovernmentalism, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2004.
14 Hall, Ronald, and Smith, Alasdair, Competitiveness and Cohesion in EU Policies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
15 Abbott, A. et al.(2016), "Boon or burden: what has the EU ever done for science?", Nature 534(7607), pp.307-309.   DOI
16 Cressey, D.(2016a), "Academics across Europe join 'Brexit' debate", Nature, 530(7588), pp. 15.   DOI
17 Knapton S.(2016. June 10), "13 Nobel laureates urge Britain to stay in European Union", The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk.
18 Cressey, D.(2016b), "Scientists say 'no' to UK exit from Europe in Nature poll", Nature, 531(7596), pp. 559.   DOI
19 Feildenk, T.(2016. June 13), "Would Brexit compromise the future of UK science?", BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com.
20 Hook, D. and Szomszor, M. (2016), "Examining implications of Brexit for the UK research base: An analysis of the UK's competitive research funding", Digital Science.