Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5050/KSNVE.2011.21.12.1177

Comparison of Noise Abatement Policies in Advanced Countries and Korea  

Kang, Dae-Joon (국립환경과학원)
Publication Information
Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering / v.21, no.12, 2011 , pp. 1177-1184 More about this Journal
Abstract
One of the main objectives of noise control act is to define and ensure application and respect of noise exposure limits. Most advanced countries have prepared a legal framework for noise limits either by national laws, ordinances or municipal by-laws. A large number of advaced countries have adopted the Leq index for the main sources of noise(road, railway, industry). The exception is aircraft noise for which regulatory practice is highly disparate. These differences in the indices adopted, the periods and areas to which regulations apply, definitions of measurement conditions and ways in which noise levels are calculated make it difficult to compare the current advanced countries standards. This study presents the current noise abatement policy of the advanced countries and proposes the improvement of the current noise abatement policy of Korea to catch up with it of the advanced countries.
Keywords
Noise Abatement Policy; Noise Regulatory Policy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise, 1980, Guidelines for Considering Noise in Land Use Planning and Control, USA.
2 Beckenbauer, Th., 1992, Living with Leq in Germany, Proceedings of Euronoise 92, Book 1, Institute of Acoustics, U.K.
3 Frenking, H., 1988, Exchange of Information on Noise Abatement Policies : Case Study on Germany, Report Prepared for OECD Environment Directorate.
4 Gottlob, D., 1993, Basic Concept of Noise Regulation in Germany as Compared to European Guidelines, Proceedings of the 6th International Congress "Noise & Man 93", Vol. 3, Nice, France.
5 Gottlob, D., 1994, Regulations for Community Noise, Proceedings of Inter-Noise 94, Yokohama, Japan.
6 Keppel, A., 1991, Rechtsregelungen fur den Larmschutz an Schienenverkehswegen, Zeitschrift fur Larmbekampfung 38.
7 Landesamt fur Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz NRW, 2008, Beurteilung von Veranstaltungslarm, Deutschland.
8 Sechzehnte Verodnung der Bundesrgierung Bundesrgierung Zur Dunchfuhrung des Bundes Immissinsschutzgesetzes( Verkhrslarmschutz Verordnung-16. Bim Sch.V), 1990, Deutschland.
9 Directive 2001/43/EC, 2001, Amending Council Directive 92/23/EEC Relating to Tyres for Motor Vehicles and Their Trailers and to Their Fitting.
10 Japan Environmental Agency, 1998, Environmental Quality Standards for Noise, Japan Environmental Agency Notification No. 64.
11 日本中央環境審議會, 1999, 騷音の評價手法等 の在り方について(自動車騷音の要請限度).
12 Noguchi, T., 1999, The Technical Policy of Railway Environment for the 21st Century in Japan, International Seminar for the 100th Anniversary of the National Railroads of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
13 日本中央環境審議會, 2007, 航空機騷音に係る 環境基準について.
14 National Action Plan against Noise, 1993, Report of the Commission on an National Action Plan against Noise, USA.
15 Le Ministre de l' Environnement, 1996, Relatif a la Lutte Contre les Bruits de Voisinage, Circulaire.
16 La Ministre de l' Environnement, 1995, Relatif au Bruit des Infrastructures Routieres, Arrete.
17 La Ministre de l' Amenagement du Territoire et de l' Environnement, 1999, Relatif au Bruit des Infrastructures Ferroviaires, Arrete.
18 Lambert, J. and Vallet, M., 1994, Study Related to the Preparation of a Communication on a Future EC Noise Policy, Report Prepared for the Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General XI.
19 Le Ministre de la Sante et des Solidarites, 2006, Relatif a la Lutte Contre les Bruits de Voisinage et Modifiant le Code de la Sante Publique(Disposition Reglementaries), Decrets, Arretes, Circulaire.
20 Le Ministre d' Etat, 1989, Relative a la Lutte Contre le Bruit, Circulaire.
21 Schutz vor Larm: Immissionwerte, 1991.