Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5050/KSNVN.2002.12.11.856

Seismic Qualification of the Main Control Board for Nuclear Power Plant  

변훈석 (㈜ 새한검증)
이준근 (LG전선㈜)
Publication Information
Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering / v.12, no.11, 2002 , pp. 856-863 More about this Journal
Abstract
Seismic qualification of the main control board(MCB) for the nuclear power plant Ulchin 5 and 6 has been performed with the guideline of ASME Section III and IEEE 344 code. As the size and weight of the MCB are too large and heavy to excite using the excitation table, finite element analysis is used in order to investigate the dynamic behaviors and structural integrity of the MCB. As the fundamental frequencies of the equipment are found to be less than 33 Hz, which is the upper frequency limit for the dynamic analysis, response spectrum analysis using ANSYS is performed in order to combine the modal stresses within the frequency limit. In order to confirm the electrical stability of the major components of the MCB. modal analysis theory has been adopted to derive the required response spectra at the component locations. As the all combined stresses obtained from the above procedures are less than the allowable stresses and no mechanical or electrical failures are found from the seismic testing, the authors can confirm the safety of the nuclear equipment MCB under the given seismic loading conditions.
Keywords
Seismic Qualification; Seismic Analysis; Finite Element Method; Main Control Boards; Required Response Spectra;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 ASME Sectiion III Appendix N, 1992, Dynamic Analysis Method, ASME.
2 ASME Sectiion III Appendix I, 1992, ASME
3 한국전력주식회사, 1997, 원자력발전소 기자재 기기검증.
4 ANSYS Element Reference 9th Edition, 1998, SAP INC, pp. 4-469-4-478.
5 Lee, J., Kim, J. Y., Chung, P. J. and Heo, Y. S., 1999, “Seismic Qualification of the Air Handling Units for Nuclear Power Plant," Asia-pacific Vibration Conference '99, Singapore, Vol. 2, pp. 566-575.
6 Users Guide for Response Spectrum, 1998, ANSYS, pp. 7-1-7-68.
7 원자력법. 1995. 제42조 2(성능검증업의 허가), 제42조의 3(허가기준), 제42조의 4(검사).
8 Ellis & Watts Company, 1994, Dynamic Qualification Reports for Younggwang 5 & 6 Air Handling Units.
9 Roy, R., Craig, 1992, Structural Dynamics, Wiley Publication, pp. 497-512.
10 ANSI/IEEE 344-1987, 1987, Recommended Practice For Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Station.
11 Korea Electric Power Corporation, 2000, Specification No. 9-751-J211, Purchase Specification for MCB & Associated Instruments for UCN 5 & 6.
12 이준근, 김진영, 정필중, 정정훈, 1999, 원자력 발전소(영광 5 & 6호기)용 공조기에 대한 내진 검증, 한국소음진동공학회지(현 논문집), 제 9 권, 제 3 호, pp. 535-543.   과학기술학회마을