Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2017.40.3.049

Importance-Difficulty Analysis for DQMS Requirements  

Kim, Yun-Hi (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
Park, Jong Hun (Business School, Daegu Catholic University)
Lee, Sang Cheon (Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering/ERI, GyeongSang National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering / v.40, no.3, 2017 , pp. 49-58 More about this Journal
Abstract
The DQMS (Defence Quality Management System) is a certification system that manages participating companies to improve the quality of munitions. Since Korean Defense Specification (KDS) for DQMS certification that was established by adding military requirements based on the ISO quality standard, many companies complain that they should pay too much effort into the preparation process. However, it is hard to find helpful information on the preparation process because we have been only interested in the effect of DQMS acquisition. The purpose of this paper is to provide helpful information to companies preparing for DQMS certification. We surveyed the degree of difficulty and importance of the DQMS requirements from the companies with certification experience, and performed IDA (Importance-Difficulty analysis) by dividing the companies into the main contractor and the subcontractor. The result of IDA shows that there is a different recognition to the DQMS certification between main-contracting and sub-contracting companies. Subcontractor has more difficulties than main contractor in preparing the DQMS certification. In addition, we are able to identify the difficult and important requirements in the preparation process to the DQMS certification. Both main contractor and subcontractor have difficulty to the requirements related to configuration or validation such as 'customer controls configuration', 'configuration review shall be implemented' and 'design and development validation documentation.' The requirements related to customers are important to main contractor but the subcontractor regards difficult requirements as important ones. The result of this paper would be helpful to both the company preparing for DQMS and the munitions quality assurance agency.
Keywords
Defence Quality Management System; Korea Defence Standard; Importance-Difficulty Analysis; Main Contractor; Subcontractor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Defense Acquisition Program Management Regulation-DAPA directive 353, 2016.
2 Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, Military Supplies Quality Management Basic Regulation, http://www.dtaq.re.kr, 2015.
3 Ju, J.-C., Kim, S.-K., Lee, J.-C., and Ahn, N.-S., Suggestion for the Enhancement of Military Supplies via Segregation of Defense Quality Management System, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 2016, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 251-261.   DOI
4 Kim, H.S., Kim, M.S., Shin, J.K., and Lee, S.S., Performance of Defence Quality Management System and Analysis on Certification outcomes, Conference Proceeding of the Korean Society for Quality Management, [Seoul, Korea] : Soongsil University, 2012.
5 Noh, J.Y. and Ree, S.B., A Study on Effectiveness and Improvement of Certification Defence Quality Management System, Conference Proceeding of the Korean Society for Quality Management, [Seoul, Korea] : Soongsil University, 2009.
6 Kim, S.Y., A Study on the Strategic Priority for Defense Quality Management Factors by using Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2012, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 217-224.
7 Kim, Y.-H., Lee, S.-C., and Park, J.-H., A Comparison of KDS 0050-9000-3 and ISO 9001:2008, Journal of Business Research, 2017, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 91-113.
8 Lee, S.J. and Park, Y.S., The Effectiveness on the Certification of the Defense Quality System, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 2007, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 100-106.
9 Noh, J.Y. and Ree, S.B., An Empirical Study on the Influence of Business Performance by the Defence Quality Management System, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 2011, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 444-460.
10 Park, D.-H., Shin, T.-H., and Lee, M.-S., Analysis of audit result and corrective action level of Defence Quality Management System, Conference Proceeding of the Korean Society for Quality Management (Spring), 2007, pp. 386-390.
11 Park, S.H. and Park, J.H., The Effects of ISO 9001 : 2008 Certification Factors on the Business Performance : A Comparative Study on between Mother and Subcontracting Companies, Journal of Business Research, 2016, Vol .31, No. 1, pp. 113-162.
12 Shin, B.-C., Hwang, W.-Y., Ahn, N.-S., Kim, D.-H., Lee, G.-L., Jang, B.-K., and Byun, J.-H., Suggestions on Enhancing the Effectiveness of Government Quality Assurance Activities for Military Supplies in Production Stage, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 2016, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 153-166.   DOI