Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2015.38.2.108

A Non-Oriented DEA Game Cross Efficiency Model for Supplier Selection  

Lim, Sungmook (Dongguk Business School, Dongguk University-Seoul)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering / v.38, no.2, 2015 , pp. 108-119 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study intends to propose a non-oriented DEA based game cross-efficiency approach for supplier selection. With a discussion on the choice of DEA models and approaches that are most appropriate for supplier selection, we propose a game cross efficiency model based upon the non-oriented variable returns-to-scale RAM DEA by adapting the existing game cross efficiency model based upon the oriented constant returns-to-scale CCR DEA. We develop the RAM game cross efficiency model and a convergent iterative solution procedure to find the best game cross efficiency scores that constitute a Nash equilibrium. We illustrate the proposed model with two data sets of supplier selection, and demonstrate that significantly different results are obtained when compared with the existing approaches.
Keywords
Supplier Selection; Data Envelopment Analysis; Game Cross Efficiency; Non-Oriented Model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ho, W., Xu, X., and Dey, P.K., Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection : A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, Vol. 202, No. 1, pp. 16-24.   DOI
2 Hong, G.H., Park, S.C., Jang, D.S., and Rho, H.M., An effective supplier selection method for constructing a competitive supply-relationship. Expert Systems with Applications, 2005, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 629-639.   DOI
3 Hou, J. and Su, D., EJB-MVC oriented supplier selection system for mass customization. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2007, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 54-71.   DOI
4 Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W.D., and Zhu, J., The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Operations Research, 2008, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 1278-1288.   DOI
5 Lim, S., Oh, K.W., and Zhu, J., Use of DEA cross-efficiency evaluation in portfolio selection : An application to Korean stock market. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, Vol. 236, No. 1, pp. 361-368.   DOI
6 Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., and Mahapatra, S.K., Multiproduct, multicriteria model for supplier selection with product life-cycle considerations. Decision Sciences, 2006, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 577-603.   DOI
7 Ng, W.L., An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, Vol. 186, No. 3, pp. 1059-1067.   DOI
8 Oral, M., Kettani, O., and Lang, P., A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Management Science, 1991, Vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 871-885.   DOI
9 Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H., and Hogan, A.J., Data envelopment analysis : Critique and extensions. In Measuring efficiency : An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, 73-104, Jossey-Bass, SanFrancisco, 1986.
10 Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R., A note on a methodology for supply base optimization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 130-139.   DOI
11 Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., and Nair, A., Vendor performance with supply risk : A chance-constrained DEA approach, International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 212-222.   DOI
12 Thompson, R.G., Langemeier, L.N., Lee, C.T., Lee, E., and Thrall, R.M., The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics, 1990, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 93-108.   DOI
13 Tone, K., A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, Vol. 130, No. 3, pp. 498-509.   DOI
14 Wadhwa, V. and Ravindran, A.R., Vendor selection in outsourcing. Computers and Operations Research, 2007, Vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 3725-3737.   DOI
15 Wise, R. and Morrison, D., Beyond the exchange: The future of B2B. Harvard Business Review, 2000, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 86-96.
16 Wu, T., Shunk, D., Blackhurst, J., and Appalla, R., AIDEA : A methodology for supplier evaluation and selection in a supplier-based manufacturing environment. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 2007, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 174-192.   DOI
17 Becker, R.A. and Chakrabarti, S.K., Satisficing behavior, Brouwer's fixed point theorem and Nash equilibrium. Economic Theory, 2005, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 63-83.   DOI
18 Andreson, P. and Petersen, N.C., A procedure for ranking efficient unit in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1993, Vol. 39, pp. 1261-1294.   DOI
19 Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1984, Vol. 30, pp. 1078-1092.   DOI
20 Bayazit, O., Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions. Benchmarking : An International Journal, 2006, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 566-579.   DOI
21 Chan, F.T.S., Chan, H.K., Ip, R.W.L., and Lau, H.C.W., A decision support system for supplier selection in the airline industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2007, Vol. 221, No. 4, pp. 741-758.   DOI
22 Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-444.   DOI
23 Doyle, J. and Green, R., Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA : Derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 567-578.   DOI
24 Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Golany, B., Seiford, L.M., and Stutz, J., Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 1985, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 91-107.   DOI
25 Cooper, W.W., Park, K.S., and Pastor, J.T., RAM : A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1999, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 5-42.   DOI
26 Debreu, D., A social equilibrium existence theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1952, Vol. 38, pp. 886-893.   DOI
27 Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F., Costantino, N., and Pietroforte, R., Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, Vol. 218, No. 2, pp. 523-529.   DOI
28 Gencer, C. and Gurpinar, D., Analytic network process in supplier selection : A case study in an electronic firm. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 2007, Vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 2475-2486.   DOI
29 Glicksberg, I.L., A further generalization of the Kakutani fixed point theorem with application to Nash equilibrium points. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1952, Vol. 38, pp. 170-174.
30 Green, R.H., Doyle, J.R., and Cook, W.D., Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 461-472.   DOI