Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2014.37.2.19

A Study on the Technology Evaluation Index for Superior Product Selection in the Public Procurement System : Focusing SME Technological Innovation  

Cho, Daemyeong (Graduate School of Technology and Innovation Management, Hanyang University)
Lee, Saehun (Graduate School of Technology and Innovation Management, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering / v.37, no.2, 2014 , pp. 19-26 More about this Journal
Abstract
With the radical changes and advancements of industrial economy, it is required to secure product competitiveness through technological innovations to overcome uncertain environments and generate a driving force for sustainable growth. So the Korea government introduced the superior product selection system in 1996 and has granted such incentives as priority purchasing and contracts the products of SME whose technological capabilities have passed the screening criteria. After analyzing the ambiguity of the evaluation procurement used in designation of excellent product, this study proposed seven detailed indexes for evaluation.
Keywords
SMEs; Technological Innovation; Evaluation Index; Superior Product Selection;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, D.-S., The way of a sound Private Participation in infrastructure(PPI) Project Corporation for the Regional Development. Journal of Government Contracting, 2011, Vol. 3, p 89-112.
2 Hong, J.-M., An AHP Approach for the importance Weight of Renewable Energy Investment Criterion in the Private Sector. Korean Energy Economic Review, 2011, Vol. 10, No. 1, p 115-142.
3 Keizer, J.A., Dijkstra, L., and Haman, J.I.M., Explaining innovation efforts of SMEs : An exploratory survey among SMEs in mechanical and electrical engineering sector in The Netherlands. Technavation, 2002, Vol. 22, No. 1, p 1-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Lawshe, C.H., A quantitative approach to content validity.personnel psychology, 1980, Vol. 28, p 563-575.
5 Public Procurement service, www.pps.go.kr.
6 Saaty, Thomas, The Analytic Hierarchy Process : Planing, Priorty Setting, Resource Allocaion, New York : McGraw-Hill.
7 Schmidt, R.C., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., and Cule, P., Identifying Software Project Risk : an International Delphi Study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2001, Vol. 17, No. 4, p 5-36.   DOI
8 Stock, G.N., Greis, N.P., and Fischer, W.A., Firm size and dynamic technological innovation. Technovation, 2002, Vol. 22, No. 9, p 537-549.   DOI
9 Choi, S.-B. and Ha, G.-R., A Study of Critical Factors for Technological Innovation of Korean Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 2011, Vol. 24, p 1-24.
10 Kim, Y.-K. and Park, S.-T., An Analysis of the Relative Importance of Patent Valuation : Focused on High Technology Industry. POSRI Business Review, 2012, Vol. 12, No. 2, p 230-259.
11 Yang, C.-H. and Lee, J.-H., A case study on the development of performances indicators of industrial R&D Program. Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2012, Vol. 35, No. 2, p 1-8.   DOI