Browse > Article

An empirical study on the factor structure of justice  

이광희 (금오공과대학교 산업경영학과)
이철기 (한국기술교육대학교 산업경영학부)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering / v.27, no.1, 2004 , pp. 93-102 More about this Journal
Abstract
In recent several studies, interactional justice as well as distributional justice and procedural justice was founded as a important factor of justice. But the other studies proposed that interactional justice was a sub-dimension of procedural justice because of a very close correlation between two factors. So there are mixed point of view of the factor structure of justice. In this study, we examined the factor structure of justice using confirmative factor analysis. We hypothesized that the facto, structure of justice would be divided into three factors; distributional justice, procedural justice and interactional justice. The results of empirical study supported these hypotheses. The results of this study suggest that interactional justice should be regarded as a important factor of justice to analyze the justice and the relationship with justice and related variables more accurately.
Keywords
The factor structure of justice; Procedural Justice; Distributive Justice; Interactional Justice;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 이순묵, [공변량구조분석], 성원사, 1990
2 Ambrose, M. L., Harland, L. K., & Kulik, C. T., 'Influence of social comparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness', Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 239-246, 1991   DOI
3 Homans, G. C., Social Behavior : It's Elementary Forms (New York : Harcourt, Brace, and Jovannovich Inc.), pp. 45-57, 1961
4 James L. R., Mulaik, S. a, Brett J. M., Causal analysis : Assumptions, models, and data, Beverly Hills : Sage, 1982
5 McFarlin, D.B., & Sweeney, P.D., 'Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes', Academy of Management Journal, Vol.35, pp. 626-637, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Moorman. R. H., Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors : Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 845-855, 1991
7 Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P., Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp. 351-357, 1998
8 Price, J. L. & Mueller, C. W. ., Handbook of Organizational Measurement, Pitman Publishing Inc., 1986
9 Tyler. T. & Bies R. J., Beyond formal procedures : The interpersonal context of procedural justice, In J. carroll(Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings, pp. 77-98, Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum, 1990
10 Deutsch, M., Equity and Need : What Determines which Value will be Used as the Basis for Distributive Justice, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 137-149, 1975
11 Greenberg, J., 'The Social side of fairness : Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice,' In R. Cropanzano(Ed.), Justice in the workplace : Approaching fairness in human resource management, pp. 79-103, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1993b
12 Greenberg, J., 'Organizational justice : Yesterday, today, and tomorrow', Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp. 399-432, 1990b
13 Greenberg, J.,'The intellectual adolescence of organizational justice : You've come a long way, maybe,' Social Justice Research, Vol. 6, pp. 135-148, 1993a
14 Skarlicki. D. P., & Latham. G. P., Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union : A relicational, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 617-633, 1997
15 Bretz, Jr, R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W., 'The current state of performance appraisal research and practice : Concerns, direction, and implications', Journal of Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 321-352, 1992   DOI
16 Leventhal, G. S., 'What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?: New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships', in K. S. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg & R. H. Willis(Eds.), Social exchange : Advanced in theory and research, NY : Plenum, pp. 36, 1980
17 Bies, R. J., & Moag. J. S., 'Interactional justice : Communication criteria of fairness'. In R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, & M.H. Bazerman(Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations, Vol. 1, pp. 43-45, 1986
18 Carrell, M. R. & Dittrich, J. E., Equity theory : The recent literature, methodological considerations, and new directions, Academy of Management Review, April, pp. 202-210, 1976
19 Garland, H., Effects of piece rate underpayment and overpayment on the job performance : A test of equity theory with a new induction procedure, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 57, pp. 340-352, 1973
20 Folger, R. & Konovsky, M. A., 'Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions', Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 115-130, 1989   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R., 'Beyond fairness : A theory of allocation preferences', In G. Miikula(ed.), Justice and Social Interaction, NY : Springer-Verlag, pp. 167-218, 1980
22 Thibaut. J. & Walker. L., Procedural justice : A psychological analysis, Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum, 1975
23 Adams, J. S., 'Inequity in social exchange', In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advance in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2, New York : Academic Press. pp. 267-299, 1965
24 Bies. R. J. & Shapiro. D. L., Interactional fairness judgement: The influence of causal accounts, Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, pp. 199-218, 1987   DOI
25 Bobko, P., Multivariate correlational analysis. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough(Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology(2nd ed., Vol. 1. pp. 637-686). Palo Alto, CA : Consulting Psychologists Press, 1990
26 Sweeney. P. D. & McFarlin. D. B., Workers' evaluations of the 'ends' and 'means' : An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 55, pp. 23-40, 1993
27 Tata. J. & Bowes-Sperry. L., Emphasis on distributive, procedural, and interactional justice : Differential perceptions of men and women, Psychological Repots, Vol. 79, pp. 1327-1330, 1996
28 Aquino. K., Relationships among pay inequity, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 8, pp. 21-33, 1995
29 Bollen, K. A., Structural equations with latent variables, New York : Wiley, 1989
30 Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., 와 Taylor, M. S.. Integrating Justice and social exchange : The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, pp. 738-748, 2000
31 Shapiro. D. L., Buttner. E. H., & Barry. B., Explanations : What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process. Vol. 58. pp. 346-368, 1994
32 Greenberg, J., 'Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations', Journal of Applied psychology, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 340-342, 1986a   DOI
33 Leventhal, G. S., 'Fairness in social relationships', In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson(Eds.), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, pp. 211-240, Morristown, NJ : General Learning Press, 1976
34 Niehoff. B. P., & Moorman. R. H., Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviors, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 527-556. 1993
35 Silvia, S., Effects of Sampling Error and Model Misspecification on Goodness-of-fit Indices for Structural Equation Models. Ph.D. Dissertaion, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1988
36 Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R., The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, NY : Plenum, 1988
37 Skarlicki. D. P., & Folger. R., Retaliation in the workplace : the role of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 434-443, 1997
38 Cropanzano. R. & Ambrose. M. L., Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than our think : A monistic perspective and a research agenda, In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano(Eds.), Advances in organizational justice(pp. 119-151), Lexington, MA : New Lexington Press, 2001
39 Greenberg, J., 'Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts', Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75, pp. 561-568, 1990a
40 Pritchard, R. D., Dunnette, M. D., & Jorgenson, D. O., Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 56, pp. 75-94, 1972
41 JOreskog, K. G. & SOrbom, D., LISREL 7 User's reference guide. Chicago : Scientific software, 1989
42 Long, J, S., Covariance structure models : An introduction to LISREL, Beverly Hills : Sage, 1983
43 Aquino, K., Griffeth, R. W., Allen, D. G., & Hom, P. W., 'Integrating justice constructs into the turnover process: A test of a referent cognitions model', Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 1208-122,. 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Barling. J. & Phillips. M., Interactional, formal, and distributive justice in the workplace : An exploratory study, Journal of Psychology, Vol. 127, pp. 649-656, 1993
45 Thibaut, J. & Walker, L., 'A Theory of procedure', California Law Review, Vol. 66, pp. 541-566, 1978   DOI
46 Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G., Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 88, pp. 588-606, 1980
47 Cropanzano, R.,& Prehar, C. A., Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA, 1999
48 Colquitt, J. A., 'On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice : A Construct Validation of a Measure,' Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 386-400, 2001
49 Mansour-Cole. D. M. & Scott. S. G., Hearing it through the grapevine : The influence of source, leader-relations, and legitimacy on survivors' fairness perceptions, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 25-54, 1998
50 Konovsky, M. A. & Folger, R.. The effectiveness of attributional cues, procedural justice, and social accounts in mitigating the negative consequences of involuntary job loss. Unpublished manuscript A. B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, 1989