Surface Roughness and Microbial Adhesion After Finishing of Alkasite Restorative Material |
Park, Choa
(Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Park, Howon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) Lee, Juhyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) Seo, Hyunwoo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) Lee, Siyoung (Department of Oral Microbiology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) |
1 | Kaur M, Mann NS, Jhamb A, Batra D : A comparative evaluation of compressive strength of Cention N with glass ionomer cement: An in-vitro study. Int J Appl Dent Sci, 5:5-9, 2019. |
2 | Patki B : Direct permanent restoratives-amalgam vs composite. J Evol Med Dent Sci, 46:8912-8918, 2013. DOI |
3 | Samanta S, Kumar U, Mitra A : Comparison of microleakage in class V cavity restored with flowable composite resin, glass ionomer cement and cention N. Imp J Interdiscip Res , 3:180-183, 2017. |
4 | Jagvinder M, Sunakshi S, Sonal M, Ashok S : Cention N: A review. Int Cur Res, 10:69111-69112, 2018. |
5 | Ivoclar Vivadent AG : Cention N. Scientific documentation 2016. Available from URL: https://mena.ivoclarvivadent.com/en-me/download-center/scientific-documentation/#C(Accessed on November 10, 2016). |
6 | Debolina C, Chiranjan G, Priti D : Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of dental amalgam, Z350 composite resin and cention-N restoration in class II cavity. J Dent Med Sci, 17:52-56, 2018. |
7 | Kumari CM, Bhat KM, Bansal R : Evaluation of surface roughness of different restorative composites after polishing using atomic force microscopy. J Conserv Dent, 19:56-62, 2018. DOI |
8 | Setty A, Nagesh J, Ashwathappa GS, et al. : Comparative evaluation of surface roughness of novel resin composite Cention N with Filtek Z350 XT: In vitro study. Int J Oral Care and Res, 7:15-17, 2019. DOI |
9 | Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M : Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater, 13:258-269, 1997. DOI |
10 | A.C.O.S. AFFAIRS : Dental amalgam: Update on safety concerns. J Am Dent Assoc, 129:494-503, 1998. DOI |
11 | Rai R, Gupta R : In vitro evaluation of the effect of two finishing and polishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. J Conserv Dent, 16:564-567, 2013. DOI |
12 | Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, McDougal RA, et al. : Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. J Dent, 28:367-373, 2000. DOI |
13 | An JS, Kim K, Ahn SJ, et al. : Compositional differences in multi-species biofilms formed on various orthodontic adhesives. Eur J Orthod, 39:528-533, 2017. DOI |
14 | Svanberg M, Mjor IA, Orstavik D : Mutans Streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glassionomer restorations. J Dent Res, 69:861-864, 1990. DOI |
15 | de Fucio SB, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F, et al. : Analyses of biofilms accumulated on dental restorative materials. Am J Dent, 22:131-136, 2009. |
16 | Gama-Teixeira A, Simionato MR, Luz MA, et al. : Streptococcus mutans-induced secondary caries adjacent to glass ionomer cement, composite resin and amalgam restorations in vitro. Braz Oral Res, 21:368-374, 2007. DOI |
17 | Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, Pfister W : Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. J Oral Rehabil, 31:278-285, 2004. DOI |
18 | Gupta N, Jaiswal S, Bansal P, et al. : Comparison of fluoride ion release and alkalizing potential of a new bulk-fill alkasite. J Conserv Dent, 22:296-299, 2019. DOI |
19 | Bayrak GD, Sandalli N, Kulekci G, et al. : Effect of two different polishing systems on fluoride release, surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of newly developed restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent, 29:424-434, 2017. DOI |
20 | Bharti R, Wadhwani KK, Tikku AP, Chandra A : Dental amalgam: An update. J Conserv Dent, 13:204-208, 2010. DOI |