Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2018.45.3.370

Repair Rate of Composite Resin Restorations in Permanent First Molar in Children Under 12 Years Old  

Jeong, Yunyeong (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Nam, Okhyung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Kim, Misun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital at Gangdong)
Lee, Hyo-seol (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Choi, Sungchul (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry / v.45, no.3, 2018 , pp. 370-377 More about this Journal
Abstract
Although the frequency of composite resin restoration in children is gradually increasing, there are insufficient researches about the rate of composite resin repair in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the repair rate of composite resin restorations in the permanent first molar in children under 12 years old. This study retrospectively analyzed 169 children treated with composite resin restoration in the permanent first molar from May 2014 to April 2015. According to the location of the tooth, the repair rate was higher in the mandible than maxilla and in the left than right. In the classification of restoration, the repair rate was the highest in the class II cavity, and the repair rate was the lowest in the restoration of the occlusal surface only. Repair rate in two years was 14.8%, and repair hazard ratio decreased with age. The most common reason of composite resin restoration replacement was the secondary caries (74.1%). Within the limits of study, the repair rate of children was higher than that of adult due to the characteristics of children. Therefore, dentists should understand these characteristics and try to reduce the repair rate of composite resin composite restorations.
Keywords
Composite resin; Restoration; Repair rate; Children; Permanent first molar;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Brunthaler A, Konig F, Schedle A, et al. : Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investing, 7:63-70, 2003.   DOI
2 Forss H, Widstrom E : From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand, 59:57-62, 2001.   DOI
3 Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Van Dijken JW, Nilsson M, et al . : Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. J Dent, 37:673-678, 2009.   DOI
4 Moraschini V, Fai CK, Alto RM, Dos Santos GO : Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 43:1043-1050, 2015.   DOI
5 Hickel R, Manhart J : Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent, 3:45-64, 2001.
6 Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E : Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management, 3rd ed. Wiley Blackwell, 7-8, 304, 2015.
7 Bernardo M, Luis H, DeRouen TA, et al. : Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc, 138:775-783, 2007.   DOI
8 Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjor IA, Wilson NH : Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int, 30:234-242, 1999.
9 Casagrande L, Seminario AT, Araujo FB, et al. : Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig, 21:847-855, 2017.   DOI
10 Astvaldsdottir A, Dagerhamn J, Nilsson M, et al. : Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults - A systematic review. J Dent, 43:934-954, 2015.   DOI
11 Kim IY, Kim JM, Jeong TS, Kim S : 5 Years Evaluation of Composite Restoration on Permanent Fist Molar in Children. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 35:110-117, 2008.
12 Kim JY, Choi KK, Park SJ : Replacement of posterior restorations. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent, 31:460-469, 2006.   DOI
13 Pallesen U, Van Dijken JW, Hoigaard R, et al. : Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up. J Dent, 41:297-306, 2013.   DOI
14 Milosevic A, Burnside G : The survival of direct composite restorations in the management of severe tooth wear including attrition and erosion: A prospective 8-year study. J Dent, 44:13-19, 2016.   DOI
15 Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R : Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent, 29:481-508, 2004.
16 Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM : Fiveyear clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent, 32:379-383, 2004.   DOI
17 Van Dijken JW, Sunnegardh-Gronberg K : A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in Class II cavities. J Adhes Dent, 7:343-349, 2005.
18 Dennison JB, Straffon LH, More FG : Evaluating tooth eruption on sealant efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc, 121:610-614, 1990.   DOI
19 Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Cheung SW, Mjor IA : Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent, 29:317-324, 2001.   DOI