1 |
Burhardt L, Livas C, Ren Y, et al. : Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150:261-267, 2016.
DOI
|
2 |
Burzynski JA, Firestone AR, Deguchi T, et al. : Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 153:534-541, 2018.
DOI
|
3 |
de Waard O, Rangel FA, Breuning KH, et al. : Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146:328-336, 2014.
DOI
|
4 |
Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Berge SJ, et al. : Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 40:341-352, 2011.
DOI
|
5 |
Nagy Z, Simon B, Vag J, et al. : Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method. BMC Oral Health, 20:97, 2020.
DOI
|
6 |
Camardella LT, Breuning H, de Vasconcellos Vilella O : Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner. J Orofac Orthop, 78:211-220, 2017.
DOI
|
7 |
Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Pardi VA, Cangialosi TJ : Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod, 70:303-307, 2000.
|
8 |
Naidu D, Freer TJ : Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144: 304-310, 2013.
DOI
|
9 |
Park GH, Son K, Lee KB : Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan. J Prosthet Dent, 121:803-810, 2019.
DOI
|
10 |
Lim JH, Park JM, Myung JY, et al. : Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. J Prosthet Dent, 119:225-232, 2018.
DOI
|
11 |
Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G : Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis, 40:171-178, 1987.
DOI
|
12 |
Kim J, Park JM, Kim M, et al. : Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent, 116:221-230, 2016.
DOI
|
13 |
Grunheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE : Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146:673-682, 2014.
DOI
|
14 |
Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobson A : An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod, 75:300-304, 2005.
|
15 |
Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O'Neill J, Noar JH : Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod, 39:151-159, 2012.
DOI
|
16 |
Favaretto M, Shaw D, Elger BS, et al. : Big Data and Digitalization in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17:2495, 2020.
DOI
|
17 |
Whetten JL, Williamson PC, Major PW, et al. : Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130:485-491, 2006.
DOI
|
18 |
Rossini G, Parrini S, Debernardi CL, et al. : Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149:161-170, 2016.
DOI
|
19 |
Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Ren Y, et al. : Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143:140-147, 2013.
DOI
|
20 |
Roberts CT, Richmond S : The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics. Br J Orthod, 24:139-147, 1997.
DOI
|
21 |
Houston WJ : The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod, 83:382-390, 1983.
DOI
|
22 |
Hacker T, Heydecke G, Reissmann DR : Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens. J Dent, 43:51-57, 2015.
DOI
|
23 |
Flugge TV, Schlager S, Metzger MC, et al. : Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144:471-478, 2013.
DOI
|
24 |
Shellhart WC, Lange DW, Kaplan AL, et al. : Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions. Angle Orthod, 65:327-334, 1995.
|
25 |
Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Pinzan A, et al. : Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142:269-273, 2012.
DOI
|
26 |
Beyron HL : Occlusal changes in adult dentition. J Am Dent Assoc, 48:674-686, 1954.
DOI
|
27 |
Foster TD, Menezes DM : The assessment of occlusal features for public health planning purposes. Am J Orthod, 69:83-90, 1976.
DOI
|
28 |
Kinaan BK : Overjet and overbite distribution and correlation: a comparative epidemiological English-Iraqi study. Br J Orthod, 13:79-86, 1986.
DOI
|
29 |
Sharma R, Kumar S, Singla A : Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients. Contemp Clin Dent, 2:170-175, 2011.
DOI
|
30 |
Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, Fages M : Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont, 9:486-495, 2017.
DOI
|
31 |
Davidowitz G, Kotick PG : The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am, 55:559-570, ix, 2011.
DOI
|
32 |
Renne W, Ludlow M, Kessler R, et al. : Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent, 118:36-42, 2017.
DOI
|
33 |
Yilmaz H, Aydin MN : Digital versus conventional impression method in children: Comfort, preference and time. Int J Paediatr Dent, 29:728-735, 2019.
DOI
|
34 |
Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A : Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res, 14:1-16, 2011.
DOI
|
35 |
Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Major PW, et al. : Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129:794-803, 2006.
DOI
|
36 |
Othman SA, Harradine NW : Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review. J Orthod, 33:45-51; discussion 29, 2006.
DOI
|
37 |
Rekow ED : Dental CAD-CAM systems. What is the state of the art? J Am Dent Assoc, 122:42-48, 1991.
DOI
|