Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2021.48.4.460

Difference in Bonding Strength of RMGIC according to Type of Hemostatic Agent in Primary Tooth  

Back, Seolah (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Lee, Joonhaeng (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Kim, Jongbin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Han, Miran (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Kim, Jong Soo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry / v.48, no.4, 2021 , pp. 460-466 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of the hemostatic agent containing aluminum chloride with hemostatic agent containing ferric sulfate on the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement(RMGIC) to dentin in primary tooth. Twenty extracted non-carious human primary teeth were collected in this study. The specimens were cut to expose dentin and polished. The specimens were randomly seperated into 3 groups for treatment; group I: polyacrylic acid(PAA), RMGIC; group II: aluminum chloride, PAA, RMGIC; group III: ferric sulfate, PAA, RMGIC Ten specimens from each group were subjected to shear bond strength test. The mean shear bond strength of each group was as follows: 10.07 ± 1.83 MPa in Group I, 7.62 ± 0.78 MPA in group II, 5.23 ± 0.78 MPa in group III. There were significant differences among all groups(p < 0.001). In conclusion, both aluminum chloride hemostatic agent and ferric sulfate hemostatic agent decreased the shear bond strength of RMGIC to dentin. And ferric sulfate hemostatic agent decreased the shear bond strength of RMGIC more than the aluminium chloride hemostatic agent.
Keywords
Ferric sulfate; Aluminium chloride; Hemostatics; Primary tooth; Resin-modifiedd glass ionomer cement; Shear bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Khoroushi M, Shirazi MH, Keshani F, et al. : Composite resin bond strength to caries affected dentin contaminated with 3 different hemostatic agents. Gen Dent, 64:e11-15, 2016.
2 Chaiyabutr Y, Kois J : The effect of tooth-preparation cleansing protocol on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin contaminated with a hemostatic agent. Oper Dent, 36:18-26, 2011.   DOI
3 Hussainy SN, Nasim I, Ranjan M : Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up. J Conserv Dent, 21:510- 515, 2018.   DOI
4 Saad A, Inoue G, Tagami J, et al. : Effect of dentin contamination with two hemostatic agents on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with different conditioning. Dent Mater J, 38:257-263, 2019.   DOI
5 Woycheshin FF : An evaluation of the drugs used for gingival retraction. J Prosthet Dent, 14:769-776, 1964.   DOI
6 Kuphasuk W, Harnirattisai C, Tagami J, et al. : Bond strengths of two adhesive systems to dentin contaminated with a hemostatic agent. Oper Dent, 32:399-405, 2007.   DOI
7 Ajami AA, Kahnamoii MA, Bahari M, et al. : Effect of three different contamination removal methods on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to dentin contaminated with an aluminum chloride hemostatic agent. J Contemp Dent Pract, 14:26-33, 2013.   DOI
8 Lin A, McIntyre N, Davidson R : Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res, 71:1836- 1841, 1992.   DOI
9 Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, Van Meerbeek B, et al. : Development of a self-etch adhesive for resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res, 85:349-353, 2006.   DOI
10 Park EY, Kang S : Current aspects and prospects of glass ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. Yeungnam Univ J Med, 37:169-178, 2020.   DOI
11 Harnirattisai C, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P, Tagami J, et al. : Bond strengths of resin cements to astringent-contaminated dentin. Oper Dent, 34:415-422, 2009.   DOI
12 Gonzalez C : Effect of three different contamination removal methods on bond strength of ceramic to enamel contaminated with aluminium chloride and ferric sufate. NSUWorks, 2018.
13 Pucci CR, Araujo RM, Feitosa FA, et al. : Effects of contamination by hemostatic agents and use of cleaning agent on etch-and-rinse dentin bond strength. J Braz Dent, 27:688- 692, 2016.   DOI
14 Araujo IS, Prado CJ, Silva GR, et al. : Influence of hemostatic solution on bond strength and physicochemical properties of resin cement. J Am Dent Assoc, 145:1120-1128, 2010.   DOI
15 Madhuri B, Sreekanth KM, Sivakumar N : Clinical applications of ferric sulfate in dentistry: A narrative review. J Conserv Dent, 20:278-281, 2017.   DOI
16 Maryam H, Haleh H, Seyedeh, et al. : Effect of hemostatic agent on microshear bond strength of total-etch and selfetch adhesives systems. Dent Res J, 16:361-365, 2019.   DOI
17 O'Keefe KL, Pinzon LM, Powerss JM, et al. : Bond strength of composite to astringent-contaminated dentin using selfetching adhesives. Am J Dent, 18:168-172, 2005.
18 Bernades KO, Hilgert LA, Pereira PNR et al. : The influence of hemostatic agents on dentin and enamel surfaces and dental bonding. JADA, 145:1120-1127, 2014.
19 Khoroushi M, Shirazi MH, Keshani F, et al. : Composite resin bond strength to caries-affected dentin contaminated with 3 different hemostatic agents. Gen Dent, 64:e11-15, 2016.
20 Colak H, Dulgergil CT, Hamidi MM et al. : Early childhood caries update: A review of causes, diagnoses, and treatments. J Nat Sci Biol Med, 4:29-38, 2013.   DOI
21 Ayo-Yusuf OA, Driessen CH, Botha AJ, et al. : SEM-EDX study of prepared human dentine surfaces exposed to gingival retraction fluids. J Dent, 33:731-739, 2005.   DOI
22 Sung EC, Tai ET, Caputo AA, et al. : Effect of irrigation solutions on dentin bonding agents and restorative shear bond strength. J Prosthet Dent, 8:628-632, 2002.
23 Martin RB : The chemistry of aluminum as related to biology and medicine. Clin Chem, 32:1797-1806, 1986.   DOI
24 Moynihan P, Petersen PE : Nutrition and the prevention of dental diseases. Public Health Nutr, 7:201-226, 2006.   DOI
25 Lacy AM, Young DA : Modern concepts and materials for the pediatric dentist. Pediatric Dent, 18:469-478, 1996.
26 Santos VR, Lucchesi JA, Duarte PM, et al. : Effects of glass ionomer and microfilled composite subgingival restorations on periodontal tissue and subgingival biofilm: A 6-month evaluation. J Periodontol, 78:1522-1528, 2007.   DOI
27 Martingnon S, Tellez M, Ekstrand KR, et al. : Sealing distal proximal caries lesions in first primary molars: Efficacy after 2.5 years. Caries Res, 44:562-570, 2010.   DOI
28 Appukuttan DP : Strategies to manage patients with dental anxiety and dental phobia: literature review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent, 8:35-50, 2016.   DOI
29 Shahram FE, Niloofar S, Arezoo A : Effect of ferric sulfate contamination on the bonding effectiveness of etch-andrinse and self-etch adhesives to superficial dentin, J Conserv Dent, 16:126-130, 2013.   DOI
30 Pardis T, Marayama K : A review on common chemical hemostatic agents in restorative dentistry. Dent Res J, 11:423-428, 2014.
31 Land MF, Couri CC, Johnston WM : Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents. J Prosthet Dent, 76:477-482, 1996.   DOI
32 Tarighi P, Khoroushi M : A review on common chemical hemostatic agents in restorative dentistry. Denl Res J, 11:423-428, 2014.
33 Larson PO : Topical hemostatic agents for dermatologic surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol, 14:623-632, 1988.   DOI
34 Woody RD, Miller A, Staffanou RS : Review of the pH of hemostatic agents used in tissue displacement. J Prosthet Dent, 70:191-192, 1993.   DOI
35 Mathewson RJ, Primosch RE : Fundamentals of pediatric dentistry, 3rd ed. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, Illinois, 79, 1995.
36 Gernberg GR, Bakdash MB, Keenan KM : Relationship between proximal tooth open contacts and periodontal desease. J Periodontol, 54:529-533, 1983.   DOI
37 Tachibana A, Castanho GM, Matos AB, et al. : Influence of blood contamination on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to dental tissues. J Adhes Dent, 13:349-358, 2011.
38 Palm MD, Altman JS : Topical hemostatic agents: a review. Dermatol Surg, 34:431-445, 2008.   DOI