Study of Functional Appliance for Treatments of Children and Adolescents with Class II Malocclusion |
Kang, Himchan
(Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Lee, Koeun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) Kim, Misun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) Nam, Okhyung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) Lee, Hyo-seol (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) Kim, Kwangchul (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) Choi, Sungchul (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) |
1 | Proffit W, Fields H, Larson B, Sarver D : Contemporary Orthodontics, 5th ed. Mosby, St. Louis, 3-22, 2012. |
2 | Hitchcock HP : A cephalometric description of class II, division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod, 63:414-423, 1973. DOI |
3 | Franchi L, Pavoni C, Cozza P, et al. : Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod, 83:334-340, 2012. DOI |
4 | McNamara JA Jr : Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod, 51:177-202, 1981. |
5 | McNamara JA Jr : Neuromuscular and skeletal adaptations to altered function in the orofacial region. Am J Orthod, 64:578-606, 1973. DOI |
6 | Xiong H, Hagg U, Robinson W, et al. : The effect of continuous bite-jumping in adult rats: A morphological study. Angle Orthod, 74:86-92, 2004. |
7 | Clark WJ : The twin block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93:1-18, 1988. DOI |
8 | Bjork A : Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: Longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res, 42:400-411, 1963. DOI |
9 | Hunter CJ : The correlation of facial growth with body height and skeletal maturation at adolescence. Angle Orthod, 36:44-54, 1966. |
10 | Ekstrom C : Facial growth rate and its relation to somatic maturation in healthy children. Swed Dent J Suppl, 11:1-99, 1982. |
11 | Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Shaye R, et al. : Is it possible to modulate the growth of the human mandible with a functional appliance? Int J Orthod, 29:3-8, 1991. |
12 | Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J : Mechanism of craniofacial growth and modus operandi of functional appliances: A cell-level and cybernetic approach to orthodontic decision making. Carlson DS, ed. Monograph 23: Craniofacial growth series. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 13-74, 1990. |
13 | Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr : Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 118:159-170, 2000. DOI |
14 | Malmgren O, Omblus J, Hagg U, Pancherz H : Treatment with an orthopedic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. A study of initial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 91:143-151, 1987. DOI |
15 | Hagg U, Pancherz H : Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. an analysis of 72 male patients with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with the herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod, 10:169-76, 1988. DOI |
16 | O'Brien K, Wright J, Shaw I, et al. : Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124:234-243, 2003. DOI |
17 | Greulich WW, Pyle SI : Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Am J Med Sci, 238:393, 1959. DOI |
18 | O'Brien K, Wright J, Berk NW, et al. : Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124:488-495, 2003. DOI |
19 | Tulloch JF, Proffit WR, Phillips C : Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125:657-667, 2004. DOI |
20 | Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr : Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 118:335-340, 2000. DOI |
21 | Lewis AB, Garn SM : The relationship between tooth formation and other maturational factors. Angle Orthod, 30:70-77, 1960. |
22 | Tanner JM : Growth at adolescence, 3rd ed. Springfield, Illinois, 1962. |
23 | O'Reilly MT, Yanniello GJ : Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae: A longitudinal cephalometric study. Angle Orthod, 58:179-184, 1988. |
24 | Lamparski D : Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. Thesis. The University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 179-184, 1972. |
25 | Charlier JP, Petrovic A, Herrmann-Stutzmann J : Effects of mandibular hyperpropulsion on the prechondroblastic zone of young rat condyle. Am J Orthod, 55:71-74, 1969. DOI |
26 | Petrovic AG : Mechanisms and regulation of mandibular condylar growth. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand, 10:25-34, 1972. |
27 | Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr : Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Frankel compared with an untreated class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116:597-609, 1999. DOI |
28 | McNamara JA Jr, Connelly TG, McBride MC : Histological studies of temporomandibular joint adaptations. McNamara JA Jr ed. Monograph 4: Craniofacial growth series, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 209-227, 1975. |
29 | Creekmore TD, Radney LJ : Frankel appliance therapy: Orthopedic or orthodontic? Am J Orthod, 83:89-108, 1983. DOI |
30 | Mills JR : The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern. Br J Orthod, 18:267-275, 1991. DOI |
31 | Varlik SK, Gultan A, Tumer N : Comparison of the effects of twin block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile. Eur J Orthod, 30:128-134, 2008. DOI |
32 | Mills CM, McCulloch KJ : Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: A cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114:15-24, 1998. DOI |
33 | Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT : A prospective evaluation of bass, bionator and twin block appliances. part I-the hard tissues. Eur J Orthod, 20:501-516, 1998. DOI |
34 | Mills CM, McCulloch KJ : Posttreatment changes after successful correction of class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 118:24-33, 2000. DOI |
35 | Trenouth M : Cephalometric evaluation of the twin-block appliance in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 117:54-59, 2000. DOI |
36 | Perillo L, Castaldo M, Cannavale R, et al. : Evaluation of long-term effects in patients treated with Frankel-2 appliance. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 12:261, 2011. |
37 | Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A, Sari Z : The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of class II division 1 patients. Eur J Orthod, 25:87-93, 2003. DOI |
38 | Malta LA, Baccetti T, McNamara Jr JA, et al. : Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes induced by bionator therapy. Angle Orthod, 80:10-17, 2010. DOI |
39 | O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. : Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124:234-243, 2003. DOI |
40 | Turkkahraman H, Sayin MO : Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: Comparison with untreated class II subjects. Eur J Orthod, 28:27-34, 2005. DOI |
41 | Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr : Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Frankel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116:597-609, 1999. DOI |