1 |
Mangano A, Beretta M, Mangano F, et al. : Conventional vs digital impressions: acceptability, treatment comfort and stress among young orthodontic patients. Open Dent J, 12:118-124, 2018.
DOI
|
2 |
Burhardt L, Livas C, Ren Y, et al. : Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150:261-267, 2016.
DOI
|
3 |
Ting Shu S, Jian S : Intraoral digital impression technique: A review. J Prosthodont, 24:313-321, 2015.
DOI
|
4 |
Kim EJ, Hwang HS : Reproducibility and accuracy of tooth size measurements obtained by the use of computer. Korean J Orthod, 563-573, 1998.
|
5 |
Flugge TV, Schlager S, Metzger MC, et al. : Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144:471-478, 2013.
DOI
|
6 |
Gul Amuk N, Karsli E, Kurt G : Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning. Int Orthod, 17:151-158, 2019.
DOI
|
7 |
Richter AE, Arruda AO, Sohn W, et al. : Incidence of caries lesions among patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139:657-664, 2011.
DOI
|
8 |
Motohashi N, Kuroda T : A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod, 21:263-274, 1999.
DOI
|
9 |
Crosby DR, Alexander CG : The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 95:457-461, 1989.
DOI
|
10 |
Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA : Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 112:676-680, 1997.
DOI
|
11 |
Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA : Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod, 73:301-306, 2003.
|
12 |
Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A : Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res, 14:1-16, 2011.
DOI
|
13 |
Rossini G, Parrini S, Debernardi CL, et al. : Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149:161-170, 2016.
DOI
|
14 |
Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Fischer JR, et al. : A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod, 71:351-357, 2001.
|
15 |
Santoro M, Galkin S, Cangialosi TJ, et al. : Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124:101-105, 2003.
DOI
|
16 |
Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Jeon JH, et al. : Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent, 115:755-759, 2016.
DOI
|
17 |
Stevens DR, Flores Mir C, Nebbe B, et al. : Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129:794-803, 2006.
DOI
|
18 |
Mullen SR, Martin CA, Gladwin M, et al. : Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132:346-352, 2007.
DOI
|
19 |
Goracci C, Franchi L, Ferrari M, et al. : Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod, 38:422-428, 2016.
DOI
|
20 |
Grunheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE : Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146:673-682, 2014.
DOI
|
21 |
Camardella LT, Breuning H, de Vasconcellos Vilella O : Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner. J Orofac Orthop, 78:211-220, 2017.
DOI
|
22 |
Malik J, Rodriguez J, Petridis H, et al. : Comparison of accuracy between a conventional and two digital intraoral impression techniques. Int J Prosthodont, 31:107-113, 2018.
DOI
|
23 |
Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A : In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent, 115:313-320, 2016.
DOI
|
24 |
Sfondrini MF, Gandini P, Malfatto M, et al. : Computerized casts for orthodontic purpose using powder-free intraoral scanners: accuracy, execution time, and patient feedback. Biomed Res Int, 2018:4103232, 2018.
|
25 |
Tomita Y, Uechi J, Konno M, et al. : Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plastermodel methods and intraoral scanning. Dent Mater J, 37:628-633, 2018.
DOI
|
26 |
Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Kondo H, et al. : Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res, 64:109-113, 2020.
DOI
|
27 |
Zhang F, Suh KJ, Lee KM : Validity of intraoral scans compared with plaster models: An in-vivo comparison of dental measurements and 3D surface analysis. PLoS One, 11:e0157713, 2016.
DOI
|
28 |
Jimenez-Gayosso SI, Lara-Carrillo E, Escoffie Ramirez M, et al. : Difference between manual and digital measurements of dental arches of orthodontic patients. Medicine , 97:e10887, 2018.
DOI
|
29 |
Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Thor A, et al. : Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method. J Dent, 69:110-118, 2018.
DOI
|
30 |
Lee S, Lee JS, Lee KM, et al. : Reproducibility of an intraoral scanner: A comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 154:305-310, 2018.
DOI
|