Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2019.46.1.64

Comparison of Crown Shape and Amount of Tooth Reduction for Primary Anterior Prefabricated Crowns  

Kim, Soyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Lim, Youjin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Lee, Sangho (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Lee, Nanyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Jih, Myeongkwan (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry / v.46, no.1, 2019 , pp. 64-75 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to obtain instructions for size selection of prefabricated crown and tooth reduction by 3-dimensional analysis of the size and shape of the maxillary primary central and lateral incisors and prefabricated crowns (celluloid strip, resin veneered stainless steel, and zirconia crowns). The maxillary primary central and lateral incisors of 300 Korean children was scanned with three types of prefabricated crown to create standard three-dimensional tooth models and prefabricated crowns. The shapes of the prefabricated crowns and natural teeth were compared according to four parameters (mesio-distal width, height, labio-palatal width, and labial surface curvature coefficient) and calculated the amount of tooth reduction required for each prefabricated crown. The size 2 resin veneered stainless steel crown, size 1 zirconia crown, and size 2 celluloid strip crown were most similar in shape to the primary central incisor. The size 3 rein veneered stainless steel crown, size 2 zirconia crown, and size 3 celluloid strip crown were most similar to the primary lateral incisor. The amount of tooth reduction was similar in both maxillary primary central and lateral incisors. The incisal reduction was greatest for the zirconia crown. At the proximal surface, the zirconia and celluloid strip crowns required a similar amount of tooth reduction, but more than the resin veneered stainless steel crown. The labial surface reduction was greatest for the zirconia crown. The degree of lingual surface reduction was not significant among the three prefabricated crowns. Among the assessment parameters, mesio-distal crown width was the most important for choosing a prefabricated crown closest to the actual size of the natural crown.
Keywords
Primary anterior teeth; Resin veneered stainless steel crown; Celluloid strip crown; Zirconia crown; Tooth reduction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Waggoner WF : Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent, 37:163-170, 2015.
2 Lopez-Loverich AM, Garcia MM, Donly KJ : Retrospective study of retention of stainless steel crowns and preveneered crowns on primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent, 37:530-534, 2015.
3 Lee JM, Lee HS, Choi SC, et al. : Three dimensional analysis of primary maxillary central and lateral anterior zirconia crown. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 43:176-186, 2016.
4 Park JH, Lee SH, Lee NY, Jih MK : A morphometric study of primary anterior zirconia crowns in Korean models. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 45:41-56, 2018.
5 Clark L, Wells MH, Harris EF, Lou J : Comparison of amount of primary tooth reduction required for anterior and posterior zirconia and stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent, 38:42-46, 2016.
6 Baik BJ, Jeon SH, Kim JG, Kim YS : A study on the size of the deciduous teeth. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 29:382-388, 2002.
7 Liu HH, Dung SZ, Yang YH : Crown diameters of the deciduous teeth of Taiwanese. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 16:299-307, 2000.
8 Kim SR, Kim CM, Kim JH, et al. : Evaluation of accuracy and repeatability using CBCT and a dental scanner by means of 3D software. Int J Comput Dent, 20:65-73, 2017.
9 Axelsson G, Kirveskari P : Crown size of deciduous teeth in Icelanders. Acta Odont Scand, 42:339-343, 1984.   DOI
10 Margetts B, Brown T : Crown diameters of the deciduous teeth in Australian Aboriginals. Am J Phys Anthropol, 48:493-502, 1978.   DOI
11 de Almeida Anfe TE, Arakaki Y, Nakamura DM, Vieira GF : Mesiodistal and buccolingual crown size of deciduous teeth from a tooth bank in Brazil. Braz Dent Sci, 15:74-78, 2012.
12 Venkataraghavan K, Chan J, Karthik S : Polycarbonate crowns for primary teeth revisited: restorative options, technique and case reports. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 32:156-159, 2014.   DOI
13 Castro A, Badr SB, El-Badrawy W, Kulkarni G : Clinical performance of pedo jacket crowns in maxillary anterior primary teeth. J Dent Child (Chic), 83:125-131, 2016.
14 Park SH, Noh BD, Ahn HJ, Kim HK : Celluloid strip-finished versus polished composite surface: difference in surface discoloration in microhybrid composites. J Oral Rehabil, 31:62-66, 2004.   DOI
15 Walia T, Salami AA, Rashid F, et al. : A randomised controlled trial of three aesthetic full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 15:113-118, 2014.   DOI