Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2017.44.4.446

Evaluation of Cavity Wall Adaptation of Bulk-fill Resin Composites in Class II Cavities of Primary Molar  

Bae, Youngeun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Shin, Jonghyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Jeong, Taesung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, Jiyeon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry / v.44, no.4, 2017 , pp. 446-454 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, there have been many studies on bulk-fill resin composites. However, studies on the proper materials for pediatric patients are rare. The aim of this study was to compare the cavity wall adaptation of bulk-fill resin composites with conventional resin composite in class II cavities of primary molars using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Standardized class II slot cavities were prepared in 80 exfoliated primary molars and randomly divided into 4 groups. The control group was restored with conventional resin composite, Filtek Z-350 XT (FZ), and the three groups were restored with bulk-fill resin composites, Filtek bulk-fill posterior (FB), Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (TNC), Filtek bulk-fill flowable (FBF). All specimens were thermocycled and then immersed in 50% silver nitrate ($AgNO_3$) solution. Micro-CT was used to measure the penetration volume of the total silver nitrate and the degree of cervical marginal leakage and the number, size, and position of the voids were evaluated. The results revealed that the volume of silver nitrate were significantly different between FB and FZ (p < 0.05). The results also revealed that the penetration length of silver nitrate FBF showed statistically lower than the FZ and FB (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in number and size of voids. In conventional resin composite, most of the voids were present inside the restoration (83.3%), but the voids in the bulk-fill resin composites incidence were higher in the gingivoaxial angle. The cavity wall adaptation demonstrated in class II restorations of primary molar by new bulk fill resin composites was similar to conventional incremental technique. Bulk-fill resin composites might be an clinical option for a faster restoration in deciduous teeth.
Keywords
Bulk-fill resin composites; Cavity wall adaptation; Marginal leakage; Primary molar; Class II cavity; Micro CT;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bowen RL : Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. III. Bonding to dentin improved by pretreatment and the use of surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res, 44:903-905, 1965.   DOI
2 Brannstrom M, Nyborg H : Pulpal reaction to composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent, 27:181-189, 1972.   DOI
3 Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ : Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent, 25:435-440, 1997.   DOI
4 Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL : Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses?. J Dent Res, 75:871-878, 1996.   DOI
5 Winkler MM, Katona TR, Paydar NH : Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V light-cured composite restorations. J Dent Res, 75:1477-1483, 1996.   DOI
6 Bucuta S, Ilie N : Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig, 18:1991-2000, 2014.   DOI
7 El-Damanhoury H, Platt J : Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent, 39:374-382, 2014.   DOI
8 Dietrich T, Losche AC, Losche GM, Roulet JF : Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restroations in class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent, 27:119-128, 1999.   DOI
9 Joseph A, Santhosh L, George R, et al. : Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylatebased composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res, 24:148, 2013.   DOI
10 Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso PE : Influence of adhesive system and placement technique on microleakage of resinbased composite restorations. J Adhes Dent, 62:227-232, 2004.
11 Scotti N, Comba A, Berutti E, et al. : Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent, 8:1-8, 2014.   DOI
12 Campos EA, Ardu S, Krejci I, et al. : Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. J Dent, 42:575-581, 2014.   DOI
13 Liu L, Zhang BM, Wang DF, Wu ZJ : Effects of cure cycles on void content and mechanical properties of composite laminates. Compos Struct, 73:303-309, 2006.   DOI
14 Nazari A, Sadr A, Sumi Y, et al. : 3D assessment of void and gap formation in flowable resin composites using optical coherence tomography. J Adhes Dent, 15:237-243, 2013.
15 Lee HB, Seo HW, Lee JH, Park HW : Evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of bulk-fill resin composites. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 42:281-290, 2015.   DOI
16 Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A : Influence of increment thickness on microhardness and dentin bond strength of bulk fill resin composites. Dent Mater, 30:1104-1112, 2014.   DOI
17 Benetti AR, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Pallensen U, et al. : Bulkfill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent, 40:190-200, 2015.   DOI
18 Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Fleming GJ, et al. : Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulkfill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent, 40:500-505, 2012.   DOI
19 Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Cuiipers V, Frencken JE : Micro-CT for measuring marginal leakage of Class II resin composite restorations in primary molars prepared in vivo. Am J Dent, 21:393-397, 2008.
20 Ilie N, Schoner C, Bucher K, Hickel R : An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth. J Dent, 42:850-855, 2014.   DOI
21 Sun J, Eidelman N, Lin-Gibson S : 3D mapping of polymerization shrinkage using X-ray micro-computed tomography to predict microleakage. Dent Mater, 25:314-320, 2009.   DOI
22 Rengo C, Spagnuolo G, Ferrari M, et al. : Marginal leakage of bulk fill composites in Class II restorations: A microCT and digital microscope analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes, 60:123-129, 2015.   DOI
23 Majety KK, Pujar M : In vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers. J Conserv Dent, 14:414-417, 2011.   DOI
24 Jang JH, Park SH, Hwang IN : Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk-fill resin composites and highly filled flowable resin. Oper Dent, 40:172-180, 2015.   DOI
25 Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N : Shrinkage stresses generated during resin-composite applications: a review. J Dent Biomech, 1:1-14, 2010.
26 M R, Sajjan GS, B N K, Mittal N : Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations. J Conserv Dent, 13:9-15, 2010.   DOI
27 Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, et al. : Bulkfilling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dent Mater, 29:269-277, 2013.   DOI
28 Par M, Gamulin O, Tarle Z, et al. : Effect of temperature on post-cure polymerization of bulk-fill composites. J Dent, 42:1255-1260, 2014.   DOI
29 Moszner N, Fischer UK, Rheinberger V, et al. : Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dent Mater, 24:901-907, 2008.   DOI
30 Gaintantzopoulou MD, Gopinath VK, Zinelis S : Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars. Clin Oral Investig, 1063-1070, 2017.
31 Poggio C, Chiesa M, Colombo M, et al. : Microleakage in Class II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: In vitro evaluation of different restorative techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 18:793-798, 2013.
32 Swapna MU, Koshy S, Nainan MT, et al. : Comparing marginal microleakage of three bulk fill composites in Class II cavities using confocal microscope: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent, 18:409-413, 2015.   DOI