Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2017.44.1.72

Effects of Artificial Saliva Contamination on the Bond Strength of Three Dentin Adhesives to Dentin of Primary Teeth  

Bae, Youngeun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry & Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University Dental Hospital)
Kim, Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry & Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University Dental Hospital)
Jeong, Teasung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry & Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University Dental Hospital)
Kim, Jiyeon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry & Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University Dental Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry / v.44, no.1, 2017 , pp. 72-81 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial saliva contamination and decontamination procedures at different stages of a bonding procedure on the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of two one-step self-etch adhesives and a two-step total-etch adhesive to dentin of primary teeth. Forty-two extracted sound primary molars were randomly divided into three groups depending on three adhesives, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SBU), All-Bond Universal (ABU) and Prime & Bond NT (PNT). For each adhesive, the teeth were allocated into seven groups. Except for control group, group 1, the groups were contaminated with artificial saliva at three different stages: the groups 2 and 3 - before adhesive application; the groups 4 and 5 - before adhesive polymerization; the groups 6 and 7 - after adhesive polymerization. Decontaminating procedures were rinsing, air-drying (group 2, 4, 6) and air-drying (group 3, 5, 7). The specimens were restored with composite resin (Filtek, Z350) and microtensile bond strength was measured. The data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (p < 0.05). In the control group, using PNT resulted in significantly higher bond strength than when ABU and SBU were used (p < 0.001). For three adhesives, the groups 2, 4 and 6 had greater bond strength than the groups 3, 5 and 7. Also, when the artificial saliva was contaminated before adhesive polymerization (group 4, 5), it showed a significantly lower bond strength. Generally the two-step total-etch adhesive generated a higher bond strength than the one-step self-etch adhesive. Artificial saliva contamination before adhesive polymerization led to a drastic decrease in bond strength, and rinsing with water followed by air-drying could not recover the bond strength.
Keywords
Dentin adhesive; Artificial saliva; Contamination; Decontamination; Deciduous teeth; Bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kang C, Lee H, Lee J, et al. : The distribution of patients and treatment trends in the department of pediatric dentistry, Yonsei university dental hospital for last 5 years. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 41:134-144, 2014.   DOI
2 Kim H, Lee NY, Lee SH : A study on the changes of patient distribution and treatment pattern for the last 5 years in pediatric dental practice of Gwangju. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 39:348-356, 2012.   DOI
3 Aboushelib MN : Clinical performance of self-etching adhesives with saliva contamination. J Adhes Dent, 13:489-493, 2011.
4 El-Kalla I, Garcia-Godoy F : Saliva contamination and bond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent, 10:83-87, 1997.
5 Soldani F, Foley J : An assessment of rubber dam usage amongst specialists in paediatric dentistry practising within the UK. Int J Paediatr Dent, 17:50-56, 2007.   DOI
6 Kermanshah H, Ghabraei S, Bitaraf T : Effect of salivary contamination during different bonding stages on shear dentin bond strength of one-step self-etch and total etch adhesive. J Dent (Tehran), 7:132-138, 2010.
7 Santschi K, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A, Flury S : Effect of salivary contamination and decontamination on bond strength of two one-step self-etching adhesives to dentin of primary and permanent teeth. J Adhes Dent, 17:51-57, 2014.
8 Fakhri M, Seraj B, Hooshmand T, et al. : Effect of salivary contamination on microleakage of resin composites placed with a self-etch adhesive in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Paediatr Dent, 31:334-339, 2009.
9 Abo T, Uno S, Sano H : Comparison of bonding efficacy of an all-in-one adhesive with a self-etching primer system. Eur J Oral Sci, 112:286-292, 2004.   DOI
10 Yoo S : The effect of aging treatment for microleakage within composite resin restoration. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 40:283-295, 2013.   DOI
11 Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Tyas M : Interfacial micromorphology of three adhesive systems created in caries-affected dentin. Am J Dent, 16:202-206, 2003.
12 Eiriksson SO, Pereira PN, Sigurdsson A, et al. : Effects of saliva contamination on resin-resin bond strength. Dent Mater, 20:37-44, 2004.   DOI
13 Perdigao J, May K, Wilder A, Lopes M : The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid layer. Oper Dent, 25:186-194, 2000.
14 Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson C : Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res, 69:1240-1243, 1990.   DOI
15 Pashley D, Horner J, Brewer P : Interactions of conditioners on the dentin surface. Oper Dent, 137-150, 1991.
16 Darabi F, Tavangar M, Davalloo R : Effect of different decontamination procedures from a saliva-contaminated cured bonding system (Single Bond). Dent Res J (Isfahan), 9:399-403, 2012.
17 Khoroushi M, Karimi B : Saliva Contaminated and Re-etched All-in-one Adhesive: Influence on Bond Strength. Dent Res J (Isfahan), 3:9-13, 2006.
18 Kim J, Hong S, Choi Y, Park S : The effect of saliva decontamination procedures on dentin bond strength after universal adhesive curing. Restor Dent Endod, 40:299-305, 2015.   DOI
19 Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Stean H : Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system. Quintessence Int, 29:567-572, 1998.
20 Park J, Lee K : The influence of salivary contamination on shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems. Oper Dent, 29:437-442, 2004.
21 Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ : Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater, 11:132-136, 1995.   DOI
22 Suryakumari NB, Reddy PS, Surender L, Kiran R : In vitro evaluation of influence of salivary contamination on the dentin bond strength of one-bottle adhesive systems. Contemp Clin Dent, 2:160-164, 2011.   DOI
23 Hitmi L, Attal JP, Degrange M : Influence of the time-point of salivary contamination on dentin shear bond strength of 3 dentin adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent, 1:219-232, 1998.
24 Deepa VL, Damaraju B, Raju KR, et al. : Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of 5th, 6th and 7th generation bonding agents to coronal dentin versus Dentin at Floor of Pulp Chamber: An In vitro Study. J Int Oral Health, 6:72-76, 2014.
25 Justin RM, Paranthaman H, Ranganath LM, et al. : Effect of salivary contamination on the bond strength of total-etch and self-etch Adhesive Systems: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract, 13:655-660, 2012.
26 Sumikawa DA, Marshall G, Gee L, Marshall S : Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. Paediatr Dent, 21:439-444, 1999.
27 Yazici AR, Tuncer D, Onen A, et al. : The effect of saliva contamination on microleakage of an etchand-rinse and a self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent, 9:305-309, 2007.
28 Salvio LA, Sinhoreti MAC, Konno ANK, et al. : Shear bond strength of adhesive systems to salivacontaminated dentin. Braz J Oral Sci, 3:404-408, 2015.
29 Johnson ME, Burgess JO, Hermesch CB, Buikema DJ : Saliva contamination of dentin bonding agents. Paediatr Dent, 19:205-210, 1994.
30 Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Kerby RE, et al. : Bond strengths of one-and two-step self-etch adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent, 97:216-222, 2007.   DOI
31 Haller B : Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent, 13:44-50, 2000.
32 Meerbeek BV, Landuty KV, Suzuki K, et al. : Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J, 24:1-13, 2005.   DOI
33 Hiraishi N, Kitasako Y, Tagami J, et al. : Effect of artificial saliva contamination on pH value change and dentin bond strength. Dent Mater, 19:429-434, 2003.   DOI
34 Xie J, Powers J, McGuckin R : In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater, 9:295-299, 1993.   DOI
35 Yoo H, Oh T, Pereira P : Effect of saliva contamination on the microshear bond strength of one-step self-etching adhesive systems to dentin. Oper Dent, 31:127-134, 2006.   DOI
36 Dai XF, Ten Cate A, Limeback H : The extent and distribution of intratubular collagen fibrils in human dentine. Arch Oral Biol, 36:775-778, 1991.   DOI