1 |
Mouakeh M : Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 119:640-649, 2001.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
van Vuuren C : A review of the literature on the prevalence of Class III malocclusion and the mandibular prognathic growth hypotheses. Aust Orthod J, 12:23-28, 1991.
|
3 |
Thilander B, Myrberg N : The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res, 81:12-21, 1973.
|
4 |
Ellis E, 3rd, McNamara JA, Jr. : Components of adult Class III malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 42:295-305, 1984.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
McNamara JA, Jr. : An orthopedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusion in young patients. J Clin Orthod, 21:598-608, 1987.
|
6 |
Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB, et al. : The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128:299-309, 2005.
DOI
|
7 |
Sar C, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Uckan S, et al. : Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139:636-649, 2011.
DOI
|
8 |
Geron S, Shpack N, Kandos S, et al. : Anchorage loss-a multifactorial response. Angle Orthod, 73:730-737, 2003.
|
9 |
Baik HS : Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108:583-592, 1995.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Macdonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK : Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116:13-24, 1999.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
da Silva Filho OG, Magro AC, Capelozza Filho L : Early treatment of the Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113:196-203, 1998.
DOI
|
12 |
Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, et al. : Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113:333-343, 1998.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Ngan P, Cheung E, Wei SHY : Comparison of Protraction Facemask Response Using Banded and Bonded Expansion Appliances as Anchorage. Semi Orthod, 13:175-185, 2007.
DOI
|
14 |
Tanne K, Hiraga J, Sakuda M : Effects of directions of maxillary protraction forces on biomechanical changes in craniofacial complex. Eur J Orthod, 11:382-391, 1989.
DOI
|
15 |
Lee NK, Yang IH, Baek SH : The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod, 82:846-852, 2012.
DOI
|
16 |
Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO : Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored face mask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133:440-449, 2008.
DOI
|
17 |
Guyer EC, Ellis EE, 3rd, McNamara JA, Jr., et al. : Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod, 56:7-30, 1986.
|