Browse > Article

Study on the Case of the Asymmetric War  

Kim, Sung Woo (동명대학교 군사학과)
Publication Information
Convergence Security Journal / v.16, no.6_1, 2016 , pp. 25-32 More about this Journal
Abstract
We can not respond asymmetric warfare effectively. The asymmetric operation is performed in asymmetric methods and means with different characteristics and functions to their enemy. And the character of the asymmetric operation have 'heterogeneity' and 'superiority' in principle. The type of asymmetric strategy is complex and diverse. Since we can classify the type of the asymmetric strategy in many different way and we must study in many ways and aspects. When we study asymmetric war previous cases from modern to ancient era, we can find that the key factors of the victory have superiority of the asymmetric strategy and discriminatory measures. The asymmetry is created when one party has to adapt to the strategic environment. If we want to secure a strategic advantage, we must take a number of case studies and countermeasures for asymmetric warfare.
Keywords
asymmetric warfare; asymmetric methods; discriminatory measures; strategic environment; development of new asymmetric strategy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 연합뉴스 2016년 2월 16일자
2 김성우, 6.25전쟁사, (서울 : 진영출판사, 2015). p.316.
3 국방부, 2014 국방백서, (서울, 2014), p10.
4 백광일. 남창희. 이수형, "동북아 비대칭 안보위협 과 한국의 대응방안," 경남대학교 극동문제연구소, 한국과 국제 정치, 제19권 제2호, 2003, pp. 121-152.
5 이상학, "육군의 미래작전수행개념연구," 한국전략 문제연구소, 육군 전투 발전: 미래육군모습설계 및 전투발전방안, 2003, pp. 125-126.
6 김성우, 손자병법(서울, 진영사, 2015). p.16.
7 육군사관학교,세계전쟁사(서울: 일신사, 1985), pp. 55-66.
8 Steven Metz and Douglas V. Johnson II, A Symmetry & U.S. Military Strategy: Definition, Background, and Strategic Concepts(Strategic Studies Institute, 2001), p. 9.
9 Steven Metz and Douglas V. Johnson II(2001), pp. 6-7.
10 박창희, "비대칭 전략에 관한 이론적 고찰," 한국 국방연구원, 국방정책연구, 제24권 제1호, 2008 년 봄, 통권 제79호, p. 191.
11 박창희(2008), pp. 192-195.
12 Bruce Bennett et. at., What Are Asymmetric Strategies? (Santa Minica: RAND, 1999), p. 3.
13 James H. Hughes, "The Current Status of China's Military Space Program," The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, vol. 27, no. 4. Winter 2002, p. 406
14 박창희(2008), p. 185.
15 James E. Dougherty and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr., Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comparative Survey(Cambridge: Harper & Row, 1981), pp. 282-248.
16 Bruce Bennett et. al.(1990), p. 7.
17 Jeffrey Record, "Why the Strong Lose," Parameters, Winter 2006, p. 23.
18 Jeffrey Recerd(2006), pp. 22-44.
19 Chen Jian, "China and the First Indo-China War, 1950-1954," The China Quarterly, March 1993, no. 133, pp. 85-110.
20 박창희(2008), p. 24.
21 노병천, 도해세계전사(서울 ; 연경문화사, 1996). p.57.
22 권태영, "천안함 이후 우리의 역-비대칭 전략 및 정책 방향." 국방연구원,국방정책연구,제26권 제3호, 2010년 가을호, 통권 제89호, pp.48-49
23 권태영(2010), pp.49-50
24 권태영(2010), pp.50-51.
25 김강녕, 남북한과 국제정치(경주 : 신지서원, 2011. 8), p. 87.
26 김재엽, "4세대 전쟁: 미래전과 한국 안보에 대한 함의," 신아시아연구소, 신아세아, 제17권 1호 (2010. 3. 30), pp. 162-191.
27 양욱, "4세대전쟁, 한국의 대비책" 시사저널, 통권 제 1108호(2011. 1. 11), pp. 30-33.
28 권태영(2010), pp. 52-53.