Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2018.27.1.097

Expressive Characteristics of Subversive Appropriation in Kim kwang soo's Architectural Design  

Park, Young-Tae (동양미래대학교 실내환경디자인과)
Publication Information
Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal / v.27, no.1, 2018 , pp. 97-108 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is based on the way Kim Kwang Soo works, which reveals a strong expressive tone that is rare in Korean architecture. His work is not decorative and symbolic representation of the intention of positive amusement. Therefore, the following noteworthy points will arise. The various phenomena associated with architecture and society are researched and analyzed in a critical manner. So, it creates and expresses its own formal logic. In this study, the theory of the subversive appropriation theory was identified by using the expressive characteristics of engagement. The study was based on a conceptual framework for the overturning of the mimesis, which Benjamin and Adorno have described. From this, this study summarizes Kim Kwang Soo's nihilistic attitude, finding boundaries and crack points, and subversive expression as a new form of architectural formal logic as main characteristics of interpretation of works. The characteristics of subversive expression of Kim Kwang Soo architecture derived from this are as follows. It does not take an ideological approach to the dismantling of the internalization of traditional Korean architecture. Popular culture and social phenomena are used as materials for expression. These are structured sensibly with appropriated formal logic. Finally, the architectural position adhered to the limit of performativity was recognized as the dimension of new meaning generation.
Keywords
Kim kwang-soo; Engagement; Appropriation; Subversiveness; Aesthetic Mimesis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 G. Lucacs 외, 리얼리즘 미학의 기초이론, 이춘길 편역, 한길사, 1988
2 David Harvey, The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origin of cultura, 포스트 모더니티의 조건, 구동회.박영민 옮김, 한울, 2009
3 이동면.이현석, 리얼리즘이란 무엇인가, 세계, 1987
4 Jay Dabid Bolter & Richard Grusin, Remediation: Understanding New Media, "재매개, 뉴미디어의 계보학", 이재현 옮김, 커뮤니케이션 북스, 2006
5 Th. W. Adorno, M. Horkheimer 김유동 역, 계몽의 변증법, 문학과 지성사, 2001
6 Th. W. Adorno, 부정변증법, 홍승용 역, 한길사, 1999
7 Th. W. Adorno, 미학이론, 홍승용 역, 문학과 지성사, 1997
8 Walter. Bemjamin, 반성완 편역, 발터 벤야민의 문예이론, 민음사, 2012
9 Walter Benjamin, 발터 벤야민 선집 6-언어일반과 인간의 언어에 대하여 / 번역자의 과제 외, 최성만 옮김, 도서출판 길, 2010
10 차봉희, 비판미학, 문학과 지성사, 1999
11 박영태, 건축디자인의 메타성에 대한 아도르노의 부정미학적 해석, 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 통권 제96호, 2012
12 박영태, 건축디자인에 나타난 전복적 미메시스의 표현특성 연구, 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 통권 제97호, 2013
13 박영태, 성찰적 근대화 이후 건축의 전복적 미메시스 표현특성에 관한 연구, 홍익대 박사논문, 2013, p.27
14 유현주, 아도르노 미학에서의 기술, 홍익대 박사논문, 2009
15 원준식, 아도르노의 미메시스론 연구, 홍익대 박사논문, 2007
16 최성만, 유사성, 현대사상 Vol.1, 2007
17 건축평단 2017 가을호, 건축과 일상정치.김광수, 건축평단, 2017
18 건축비평집담, 초대건축가 김광수(studio_K_works), 정림건축 건축홀, 2017.4.29
19 http://www.studiokworks.com/