Browse > Article

A Study on The Triadic analysis of Korean Traditional Space Design by Peirce's Semiotics  

Park Kyung-Ae (한양대학교 실내환경디자인학과)
Hur Bum-Pal (국민대학교 실내디자인학과)
Publication Information
Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal / v.14, no.3, 2005 , pp. 103-113 More about this Journal
Abstract
As today's cultural environment entered the information society, one of the biggest trends of future is the interests of nationalism. The purpose of this study is to interpret interrelation between sign and space design and analyze Korean contemporary space how to universalize traditional conception and attitude in design. The process of this study is illustrated as follows: At first, this study contains basic concepts and theories of semiotics and discusses the possibilities of semiotic approaches in spatial designs. Since the most outspoken theorist in this field can be found in writings of C.S. Peirce, American philosopher, the theoretical basis for this research Is taken from the Peirce's Semiotics. Secondly, this research tries the conceptual approaches based on traditional thoughts of Koreans formed with the philosophic background occurred with the universe, religion and the nature. And then, it approaches for the typical characteristics of Korean traditional space to interpret the meaning and adopt the triadic structure of sign. The structure is classified in status, icon, index, and symbol to analyze the Korean contemporary space design. Finally, it examines the expression structure of the nature of Korea that is succeeded in contemporary space design as the semiotic analysis of the application examples ; and studies the examples that try to set and solve the concept of space in modern society as the real issues in our cultural situations.
Keywords
퍼어스 기호학;문화기호;한국전통공간;도상;지표;상징;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 권영걸, 공간디자인 16강, 도서출판 국제, 2001
2 안영배, 한국건축의 외부공간, 보진재, 1996
3 Elizabeth Mertz, Richard J. Parmentier, Semiotic Mediation, Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives, London : Academic Press Inc. 1985
4 Miyazaki Kiyoshi, Seating Facilities Design as a Sign, JSSD Vol.46, 1999
5 權寧傑, 韓 . 中 . 日 傳統空問의 造營精神과 方法에 관한 比較硏究, 고려 대학교 박사학위 청구논문, 2001
6 월간 인테리어, 2002년 7월호
7 현대주택, 2003년 3월호
8 임석재, 우리 옛건축과 서양건축의 만남, 대원사, 1999
9 철학아카데미, 기호학과 철학 그리고 예술, 소명출판, 2002
10 김봉렬, 시대를 담는 그릇(한국건축의 재발견1), 이상건축, 1999
11 Stephen W. Littlejohn, Theories of Human Communication, Charles Merrill Publishing Company, 1978
12 김봉렬, 이 땅에 새겨진 정신(한국건축의 재발견3), 이상건축, 1999
13 Ferdinand de Saussure, A course in general Linguistics, New York, McGrow-Hill, 1966
14 한국실내디자인학회, 한국실내디자인학회 편, 색채디자인, 기문당, 2000
15 Eco, Umberto, 김광현 역, 기호 개념과 역사, 열린책들, 2000
16 이동희, 한국의 철학적 사유의 전통, 계명대학교출판부, 1999
17 서울포럼, 아름다운 서울, (주)서울포럼, 1991
18 박영원, 디자인기호학, 청주대학교출판부, 2001
19 Berger, Arthur Asa, Signs in contemporary culture : an introduction to semiotics. New York : Longman, 1984
20 Charles S. Peirce, Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce , Vol.1-6, Harvard University Press, 1932-1935
21 김성도, 현대 기호학 강의, 민음사, 1998
22 Parret, Herman, 김성도 역, 현대기호학의 흐름, 이론과 실천, 1995
23 Umberto Eco, A theory of semiotics, Bloomington : Indiana University Press, 1976
24 박경애 외, 의미전달매체로서의 건축색채언어에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집, 17권 4호, 2001, 4
25 이상해, 문화 . 공간도식과 한국전통건축, 유네스코 동서건축문화 비교 국제심포지엄, 1999. 10. 7