Browse > Article

A Study on the Characteristics of furniture design of Ludwig Mies van der Rohe  

Lee Ran-Pyo (배재대학교 건축학부 실내건축학)
Publication Information
Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal / v.14, no.1, 2005 , pp. 134-141 More about this Journal
Abstract
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, one of the influential modernist architects in early 20th century, had an great effort to found the modern architecture through various kinds of works. Conceptually he tried to develop the trans-temporal architecture language by involving a reintegration of countermanding principles in both ideas and practices for designing buildings. The model for his striving to find such a synthesis or a dynamic form was the neo-classicism of K. F Schinkel, inasmuch as Schinkel endeavored to combine the classical rationalistic order with the creative act of construction and to make these two melt into his age. In the same horizon with that Mies van der Rohe attempted to express the industrialized civilization of his time as a given fact, though this phenomenal substance was the only authentic form that has been conceivable to the people. For him the modern technology was regarded as the manifestation of rationalistic transcendency, which can be interpreted always consequentially. Here In this context this study is purposed to consider through the analysis of the ground ideas of architecture and the designed chairs, how commensurable the tectonic value (in the architecture) that is constantly evident in his works and the various autonomous drives toward deformalization (in the furniture design) that is concerned with his interest for cultural situation and materiality of form are with each other. And then it will be tried to prove, that on the ground of the trans-temporal achitecture language the furniture design of Mies van der Rohe, which emphasizes curves as individual forms, could correspond to his architecture that lays priority to space and construction
Keywords
미스 반 데어 로에;가구디자인;형태;절제된;합리주의;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Frampton, Kenneth, Studies in Tectonic Culture, The Poetics of Construction in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Architecture, Cambridge and London, The MIT Press, 2001
2 Riezler, Walter, Das Haus Tugendhat in Brunn, in: Die Form, H. 9, 1931
3 Sembach, Klaus-Juergen, Moebeldesign des 20. Jahrhunderts, Taschen Verlag, 1998
4 건축의 예언가들, 노형래, 초판, 현대건축사, 서울, 1999
5 Erinnerung von Sergius Ruenberg, in: Der Kargstuhl, Katalogdes Stuhlmuseum Burg Beverungen, Berlin 1986
6 Johnson, Philip C., Mies van der Rohe, New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1947
7 Frampton, Kenneth, Studies in Tectonic Culture, The Poetics of Construction in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Architecture, Cambridge and London, The MIT Press, 2001, p.159
8 Arnheim, Rudolf, Gestalt Psychology and Artistic Form, Aspects of Form. A Symposium on Form in Nature and Art, ed., by Lancelot L. Whyte, London: Lund Humphries, 1951
9 Kirsch, Karin, Die Weissenhofsiedlung, Werkbund-Ausstellung Die Wohnung - Stuttgart 1927, Deutscher Verlags-Anstalt, Stuttgart,, 1999
10 Bier, Justus, Tugenthat, Fritz und Grete: Die Bewohner des Hauses Tugendhat aubern sich, in: Die Form, H. 11, 1931
11 Breuer, Marcel, Metallmobel, in: Innenraume, hg. v. Werner Graff, Stuttgart 1928
12 Katalog der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin: Karl Friedrich Schinkel. 1771-1941, Berlin 1981
13 Lipps, Theodor, Raumasthetik und geometrisch - optische Tauschungen, Leipzig 1987
14 Marcel Breuer, Design und Architektur hg. v. Vegesack, Alexander, Weil am Rhein 2003
15 Giedion, Sigfried: Raum, Zeit, Architektur, Ravensburg 1965
16 Koffka, Kurt, Principles of Gestalt Psychology, New York, Harcourt Brace, 1935