Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2020.47.2.172

The use of SlAdh2 promoter as a novel fruit-specific promoter in transgenic tomato  

Chung, Mi-Young (Department of Agricultural Education, Suncheon National University)
Naing, Aung Htay (Department of Horticulture, Kyungpook National University)
Vrebalov, Julia (Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Cornell University)
Shanmugam, Ashokraj (Department of Horticulture, Sunchon National University)
Lee, Do-Jin (Department of Agricultural Education, Suncheon National University)
Park, In Hwan (Department of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
Kim, Chang Kil (Department of Horticulture, Kyungpook National University)
Giovannon, James (Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Cornell University)
Publication Information
Journal of Plant Biotechnology / v.47, no.2, 2020 , pp. 172-178 More about this Journal
Abstract
Fruit-specific promoters play an important role in the improvement of traits, such as fruit quality through genetic engineering. In tomato, the development of fruit-specific promoters was previously reported, but less attention has been paid to the promoters involved in the fruit development stage. In this study, we characterized the gene expression patterns of tomato alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (SlAdh2) in various tissues of wild-type tomato (cv. Ailsa Craig). Our findings revealed that SlAdh2 expression levels were higher in the developing fruit than in the leaves, stems, and flowers. The ProSlAdh2 region, which is expressed at different stages of fruit development, was isolated from tomato genomic DNA. Following this, it was fused with a β-glucuronidase reporter gene (GUS) and introduced into wild-type tomato using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation to evaluate promoter activity in the various tissues of transgenic tomato. The ProSlAdh2:GUS promoter exhibited strong activity in the fruit and weak activity in the stems, but displayed undetectable activity in the leaves and flowers. Interestingly, the promoter was active from the appearance of the green fruit (1 cm in size) to the well-ripened stage in transgenic tomatoes, indicating its suitability for transgene expression during fruit development and ripening. Thus, our findings suggest that ProSlAdh2 may serve as a potential fruit-specific promoter for genetic-based improvement of tomato fruit quality.
Keywords
Fruit quality; Genetic transformation; Gene expression; GUS activity; Promoter analysis; Tomato;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Deikman J, Xu R, Kneissl ML, Ciardi JA, Kim KN, Pelah D (1998) Separation of cis elements responsive to ethylene, fruit development, and ripening in the 50 -flanking region of the ripeningrelated E8 gene. Plant Mol Biol 37:1001-1011   DOI
2 Dharmapuri S, Rosati C, Pallara P, Aquilani R, Bouvier F, Camara B, Giuliano G (2002) Metabolic engineering of xanthophyll content in tomato fruits. FEBS Lett 22:30-34
3 Dutt M, Dhekney S a, Soriano L, et al (2014) Temporal and spatial control of gene expression in horticultural crops. Hortic Res 1:14047. doi: 10.1038/hortres.2014.47
4 Fu X, Shi P, Shen Q, et al. (2015) T-shaped trichome-specific expression of monoterpene synthase ADH2 using promoter-$\beta$-GUS fusion in transgenic Artemisia annua L. Biotechnol Appl Biochem doi: 10.1002/bab.1440
5 Hiwasa-Tanase K, Kuroda H, Hirai T, et al (2012) Novel promoters that induce specific transgene expression during the green to ripening stages of tomato fruit development. Plant Cell Rep 31:1415-1424. doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1257-5   DOI
6 Le LQ, Lorenz Y, Scheurer S, Fotisch K, Enrique E, Bartra J, Biemelt S, Vieths S, Sonnewald U (2006) Design of tomato fruits with reduced allergenicity by dsRNAi-mediated inhibition of ns-LTP (Lyc e 3) expression. Plant Biotechnol J 4:231-242   DOI
7 Levy J, Bosin E, Feldman B, Giat Y, Miinster A, Danilenko M, Sharoni Y (1995) Lycopene is a more potent inhibitor of human cancer cell proliferation than either alpha-carotene or betacarotene. Nutr Cancer 24: 257-266   DOI
8 Mollet B, Niederberger P, Petiard V (2008) Novel tomato flavours introduced by plastidial terpenoid pathway engineering. Trends Biotechnol 26:4-6   DOI
9 Longhurst T, Lee E, Hinde R, et al (1994) Structure of the tomato Adh2 gene and Adh2 pseudogenes, and a study of Adh2 gene expression in fruit. Plant Mol Biol 26:1073-1084. doi: 10.1007/BF00040690   DOI
10 Manriquez D, El-Sharkawy I, Flores FB, et al (2006) Two highly divergent alcohol dehydrogenases of melon exhibit fruit ripening-specific expression and distinct biochemical characteristics. Plant Mol Biol 61:675-685. doi: 10.1007/s11103-006-0040-9   DOI
11 Naing AH, Park KI, Ai TN, Chung MY, Han JS, Kang YW, Lim KB, Kim CK (2017) Overexpression of snapdragon Delila (Del) gene in tobacco enhances anthocyanin accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol 17(1):65   DOI
12 Speirs J, Correll R, Cain P (2002) Relationship between ADH activity, ripeness and softness in six tomato cultivars. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 93:137-142. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00316-8   DOI
13 Speirs J, Lee E, Holt K, et al (1998) Genetic Manipulation of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Levels in Ripening Tomato Fruit Affects the Balance of Some Flavor Aldehydes and Alcohols1. Plant Physiol 117:1047-1058. doi: 10.1104/pp.117.3.1047   DOI
14 Tanksley SD (1979) Linkage, chromosomal association, and expression of Adh-1 and Pgm-2 in tomato. Biochem Genet 17:1159-67   DOI
15 Van Eck J, Kirk DD, Walmsley AM (2006) Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Methods Mol Biol 343: 459-473
16 Yang L, Pan A, Jia J, Ding J, Chen J, Huang C, Zhang C, Zhang D (2005) Validation of a tomato specific gene, LAT52, used as an endogenous reference gene in qualitative and real-time quantitative PCR detection of transgenic tomatoes. J Agric Food Chem 53:183-190   DOI
17 Wang NN, Shin MC, Li N (2005) The GUS reporter-aided analysis of the promoter activities of Arabidopsis ACC synthase genes AtACS4, AtACS5, and AtACS7 induced by hormones and stresses. J Exp Bot 56:909-920. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri083   DOI
18 Wang S, Liu J, Feng Y, Niu X, Giovannoni J, Liu Y (2008) Altered plastid levels and potential for improved fruit nutrient content by downregulation of the tomato DDB1-interacting protein CUL4. Plant J 55:89-103   DOI
19 Xu R, Goldman S, Coupe S, Deikman J (1996) Ethylene control of E4 transcription during tomato fruit ripening involves two cooperative cis elements. Plant Mol Biol 31:1117-1127   DOI
20 Atkinson RG, Bolitho KM, Wright M a., et al. (1998) Apple ACC-oxidase and polygalacturonase: Ripening-specific gene expression and promoter analysis in transgenic tomato. Plant Mol Biol 38:449-460. doi: 10.1023/A:1006065926397   DOI
21 Blume B, Grierson D (1997) Expression of ACC oxidase promoter-GUS fusions in tomato and Nicotiana plumbaginifolia regulated by developmental and environmental stimuli. Plant J 12:731-746. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.12040731.x   DOI
22 Butelli E, Titta L, Giorgio M, Mock HP, Matros A, Peterek S, Schijlen EG, Hall RD Chung M-Y, Vrebalov J, Alba R, et al (2010) A tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) APETALA2/ERF gene, SlAP2a, is a negative regulator of fruit ripening. Plant J 64:936-947. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04384.x   DOI
23 de Jong J, Mertens MMJ, Rademaker W (1994) Stable expression of the GUS reporter gene in chrysanthemum depends on binary plasmid T-DNA. Plant Cell Rep 14:59-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00233300   DOI
24 Clinton SK, Emenhiser C, Schwartz SJ, Bostwick DG, Williams AW, Moore BJ, Coupe SA, Deikman J (1997) Characterization of a DNA-binding protein that interacts with 50 flanking regions of two fruitripening genes. Plant J 11:1207-1218   DOI