Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2018.45.4.382

In vitro micropropagation of M.26 (Malus pumila Mill) apple rootstock and assessment of the genetic diversity of proliferated plantlets using simple sequence repeat markers  

Cho, Kang Hee (Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Han, Bong Hee (Foundation of Agri. Tech. Commercialization and Transfer)
Han, Jeom Hwa (Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Park, Seo Jun (Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Se Hee (Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Han Chan (Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Mi Young (Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Myung-Su (Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Publication Information
Journal of Plant Biotechnology / v.45, no.4, 2018 , pp. 382-391 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the most effective medium condition of shoot proliferation and root formation for the efficient in vitro micropropagation of M.26 (Malus pumila Mill). Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were used to analyze the genetic diversity of micro-propagated and greenhouse grown M.26. Shoot proliferation was carried out in MS (Murashige and Skoog) containing benzyladenin (BA, $0.5{\sim}5.0mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$) and thidiazuron (TDZ, $0.01{\sim}0.1mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$). The highest number of shoots (10.67 shoots per explant) was induced by adding BA at a concentration $1.0mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$. TDZ treatments caused higher hyperhydricity rate in cultured explants than in BA treatments. There was no significant effect of both BA and auxin on shoot proliferation, and the optimum proliferation medium for M.26 was MS medium containing $1.0mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ BA. To find a suitable medium composition for shoot rooting, we tested different concentrations indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and ${\alpha}$-naphthaleneacetic acid ($0.5{\sim}5.0mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$), MS medium (1/4-1), sucrose ($0{\sim}30g{\cdot}L^{-1}$). The shoots showed good rooting on half-strength MS medium containing $1.0mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ IBA and $15-20g{\cdot}L^{-1}$ sucrose. The rooting rate (100%), number of roots (10.45 ~ 13.60 roots per explant), root length (7.41 ~ 8.33 cm), and shoot length (4.93 ~ 5.38 cm) were good on this medium. Fifteen SSR primers were detected in a total of 30 alleles in 20 micro-propagated plantlets, all SSR profiles from micro-propagated plantlets were monomorphic and similar to greenhouse grown control plantlet M.26 plant. The results indicated that M.26 micro-propagated plantlets were genetically stable.
Keywords
Apple; Genetic diversity; In vitro; Micro-propagation; Plant growth regulator;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Amberger PV, Shoemaker RC, Palmer RG (1992) Inheritance of two independent isozyme variants in soybean plants derived from tissue culture. Theor Appl Genet 84:600-607
2 Bahmani R, Karami O, Gholami M (2009) Influence of carbon sources and their concentrations on rooting and hyperhydricity of apple rootstock MM.106. World Appl Sci J 6:1513-1517
3 Calamar A, De Klerk GJ (2002) Effect of sucrose on adventitious root regeneration in apple. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 70:207-212   DOI
4 Castillo A, Cabrera D, Rodriguez P, Zoppolo R, Robinson T (2015) In vitro micropropagation of CG41 apple rootstock. Acta Hort 1083:569-576
5 Chakrabarty D, Park SY, Ali MB, Shin KS, Paek KY (2005) Hyperhydricity in apple: ultrastuctural and physiological aspects. Tree Physiol 26:377-388
6 Cho KH, Heo S, Kim JH, Shin IS, Kim SE, Kim DH, Han SE, Kim HR (2010) Analysis of genetic diversity of apple cultivars using RAPD and SSR markers. Kor J Breed Sci 42:525-533
7 Ciccotti AM, Bisognin C, Battocletti I, Salvadori A, Herdemertens M, Jarausch W (2008) Micropropagation of apple proliferationresistant apomictic Malus sieboldii genotypes. Agron Res 6:445-458
8 de Klerk G-J, Pramanik D (2017) Trichloroacetate, an inhibitor of wax biosynthesis, prevents the development of hyperhydricity in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 131:89-95   DOI
9 Dobranszki J, Teixeira da Silva JA (2010) Micropropagation of apple- a review. Biotechnol Adv 28:462-488   DOI
10 Devarumath RM, Nandy S, Rani V, Marimuthu S, Muraleedharan N, Raina SN (2002) RAPD, ISSR and RFLP fingerprints as useful markers to evaluate genetic integrity of micropropagated plants of three diploid and triploid elite tea clones representing Camellia sinensis (China type) and C. assamica ssp. assamica (Assam-India type). Plant Cell Rep 21:166-173   DOI
11 Geng F, Moran R, Day M, Halteman W, Zhang D (2016) Increasing in vitro shoot elongation and proliferation of 'G.30' and 'G.41' apple by chilling explants and plant growth regulators. HortScience 51:899-904   DOI
12 Ghanbari A (2014) Impacts of plant growth regulators and culture media on in vitro propagation of three apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) rootstocks. Iran J Gent Plant Breed 3:11-20
13 Gimenez C, Garcia ED, Enrech NXD, Blanca I (2001) Somaclonal variation of banana: cytogenetic and molecular characterization of somaclonal variant CIEN BTA-03. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:217-222   DOI
14 Ivanova M, Van Staden J (2011) Influence of gelling agent and cytokinins on the control of hyperhydricity in Aloe polyphylla. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 104:13-21   DOI
15 Jain SM (2001) Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement. Euphytica 118:153-166   DOI
16 Ko S-M, Lee J-H, Oh M-M (2018) Development of nutrient solution for in vitro propagation of ‘M9’ apple rootstock plantlets. Hortic Sci Technol 36:202-214
17 James DJ, Thurnbon IJ (1981) Shoot and root initiation in vitro in the apple rootstock M.9 and the promotive effects of phloroglucinol. J Hortic Sci 56-15-20   DOI
18 Jones OP (1967) Effect of benzyladenine on isolated apple shoots. Nature 215:1514-1515   DOI
19 Jun JH, Chung KH, Jeong SB, Hong KH, Kang SJ (2001) Rapid multiplication of M.9 apple rootstocks in vitro. Kor J Hort Technol 19:34-38
20 Kadota M, Niimi Y (2003) Effects of cytokinin types and their concentrations on shoot proliferation and hyperhydricity in in vitro pear cultivar shoots. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 72:261-265   DOI
21 Lane WD, Mcdougald JM (1982) Shoot tissue culture of apple:comparative response of five cultivars to cytokinin and auxin. Can J Plant Sci 62:689-694   DOI
22 Li X, Xu M, Korban SS (2002) DNA methylation profiles differ between field- and in vitro-grown leaves of apple. J Plant Physiol 159:1229-1234   DOI
23 Liebhard R, Gianfranceschi L, Koller B, Ryder CD, Tarchini R, Van de Weg E, Gessler C (2002) Development and characterisation of 140 new microsatellites in apple (Malus ${\times}$ domestica Borkh.). Mol Breed 10: 217-241   DOI
24 Liu M, Jiang F, Kong X, Tian J, Wu Z, Wu Z (2017) Effects of multiple factors on hyperhydricity of Allium sativum L. Sci Hortic 217:285-296   DOI
25 Martins M, Sarmento D, Oliveira MM (2004) Genetic stability of micropropagated almond plantlets, as assessed by RAPD and ISSR markers. Plant Cell Rep 23:492-496   DOI
26 Pathak H, Dhawan V (2012) ISSR assay for ascertaining genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants of apple rootstock Merton 793. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 48:137-143
27 McMeans O, Skirvin RM, Otterbacher A, Mitiku G (1998) Assessment of tissue culture-derived 'Gala' and 'Royal Gala' apples (Malus ${\times}$ domestica Borkh.) for somaclonal variation. Euphytica 103:251-257   DOI
28 Modgil M, Mahajan K, Chakrabarti SK, Sharma DR, Sobti RC (2005) Molecular analysis of genetic stability in micropropagated apple rootstock MM106. Sci Hortic 104:151-160   DOI
29 Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473-497   DOI
30 Palombi MA, Damiano C (2002) Comparison between RAPD and SSR molecular markers in detecting genetic variation in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev). Plant Cell Rep 20:1061-1066   DOI
31 Picoli EAT, Otoni WC, Figueira ML, Carolino SMB, Almeida RS, Silva EAM, Carvalho CR, Fontes EPB (2001) Hyperhydricity in vitro eggplant regenerated plants: structural characteristics and involvement of BiP (Binding Protein). Plant Sci 160:857-868   DOI
32 Prado MJ, Gonzalez MV, Romo S, Herrera MT (2007) Adventitious plant regeneration on leaf explants from adult male kiwifruit and AFLP analysis of genetic variation. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 88:1-10   DOI
33 Snir I, Erez A (1980) In vitro propagation of Malling Merton apple rootstocks. HortScience 15:597-598
34 Sun QR, Sun HY, Bell RL, Li LG, Xin L, Tao JH, Li Q (2014) Optimisation of the media for in vitro shoot proliferation and root induction in three new cold-hardy and dwarfing or semi-dwarfing clonal apple rootstocks. J Hortic Sci Biotech 89:381-388   DOI
35 Yepes LM, Aldwinckle HS (1994) Micropropagation of thirteen Malus cultivars and rootstocks, and effect of antibiotics on proliferation. Plant Growth Regul 15:55-67   DOI
36 Van Nieuwkerk JP, Zimmerman RH, Fordham I (1986) Thidiazuron stimulation of apple shoot proliferation in vitro. HortScience 21:516-518
37 Werner EM, Boe AA (1980) In vitro propagation Malling 7 apple rootstock. HortScience 15:509-510
38 Yadav MK, Gaur AK, Garg GK (2003) Development of suitable protocol to overcome hyperhydricity in carnation during micropropagation. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 72:153-156   DOI
39 Yoon TM, Park HY, Sagong DH (2005) Effect of root pruning on tree growth and fruit quality of 'Fuji'/M.9 apple trees. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 23:275-281
40 Ziv M (2005) Simple bioreactors for mass propagation of plants. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 81:277-285   DOI