Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2018.45.4.299

Current status of new plant breeding technology and its efforts toward social acceptance  

Jung, Yu Jin (Department of Horticultural Life Science, Hankyong National University)
Kim, Jong Mi (Korea Public Management Institute)
Park, Soo-Chul (Crop Biotechnology Institute, Green Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University)
Cho, Yong-Gu (Department of Crop Science, Chungbuk National University)
Kang, Kwon Kyoo (Department of Horticultural Life Science, Hankyong National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Plant Biotechnology / v.45, no.4, 2018 , pp. 299-305 More about this Journal
Abstract
Although new plant breeding technologies facilitate efficient plant breeding without introducing a transgene, they are creating indistinct boundaries in the regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The rapid advancement in plant breeding by genome-editing requires the establishment of a new global policy for the new biotechnology, while filling the gap between process-based and product-based GMO in terms of regulations. In this study recent developments in producing major crops using new plant breeding technologies were reviewed, and a regulatory model that takes into account the various methodologies to achieve genetic modifications as well as the resulting types of mutation were proposed. Moreover, the communication process were discussed in order to understand consumers' current situation and problems of new plant breeding technology, establish social acceptance well, and understand consumers' disputes such as GMO crops.
Keywords
Genome editing; Crops; Breeding; GMO; Regulations; Society;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Abe A, Kosugi S, Yoshida K, Natsume S, Takagi H, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, oshida K, Mitsuoka C, Tamiru M, Innan H, Cano L, Kamoun S, Terauchi R (2012) Genome sequencing reveals gronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nat Biotechnol 30:174-178   DOI
2 ACRE (2002) The criteria used by ACRE to gauge harm when giving advice on the risks of releasing genetically modified organisms to the environment. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/acre/harm/pdf/acre_harm_report.pdf
3 Araki M and Ishii T (2015) Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing. TRPLSC:1257
4 Baker GA and Mazzocco MA (2002) Consumer response to GMO foods: branding, certification, and consumer characteristics, AAEA-WAEA Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California, July 28-31
5 Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Patron NJ, Nekrasov V (2015) Editing plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9. Curr Opin Biotech 32:76-84   DOI
6 Cellini F, Chesson A, Colquhoun I, Constable A, Davies HV, Engel KH, Gatehouse AMR, Karenlampi S, Kok EJ, Leguay JJ, Lehesranta S, Noteborn HPJM, Pedersen J, Smith M (2004) Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food Chem Toxicol 42:1089-1125   DOI
7 Durai S, Mani M, Kandavelou K, Wu J, Porteus MH, Chandrasegaran S (2005) Zinc finger nucleases: custom-designed molecular scissors for genome engineering of plant and mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 18:5978-5990
8 Fan J, Jia H (2013) The GM corn carcinogenic study and the proper reasoning on controversial research. Chinese Bulletin of Life Science 25:552-559
9 Holme IB, Wendt T, Holm PB (2013) Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development. Plant Biotechnol J 11:395-407   DOI
10 Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP (2013) Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e188   DOI
11 Joung JK and Sander JD (2013) TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 49-55
12 Moore T, Haig D (1991) Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. TRENDS GENET 7:45-49   DOI
13 Jung YJ, Bae SS, Lee GJ, Seo PJ, Cho YG, Kang KK (2017) A novel method for high-frequency genome editing in rice, using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. J plant Biotechnol 44:89-96   DOI
14 Kempe K, Gils M (2011) Pollination control technologies for hybrid breeding. MOL BREEDING 27:417-437   DOI
15 Kim DS, Lee IS, Jang CS, Kang SY, Seo YW (2005) Characterization of the altered anthranilate synthase in 5-methyltryptophan resistant rice mutants. Plant Cell Rep 24:357-365   DOI
16 Lee HY, Kameya T (1991) Selection and characterization of a rice mutant resistant to 5-methyltryptophan. THEOR APPL GENET 82:405-408   DOI
17 Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, Weeks DP, Yang B (2012) High efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. NAT BIOTECHNOL 30:390-392   DOI
18 Podevin N, Davies HV, Hartung F, Nogue F, Casacuberta JM (2013) Site-directed nucleases: a paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding. TRENDS BIOTECHNOL 31:375-83   DOI
19 Quetier F (2016) The CRISPR-Cas9 technology: Closer to the ultimate toolkit for targeted genome editing. Plant SCI 242:65-76   DOI
20 Rose NR, Klose RJ (2014) Understanding the relationship between DNA methylation and histone lysine methylation. BIOCHIM BIOPHYS ACTA 1839:1362-1372   DOI
21 Saze H, Tsugane K, Kanno T, Nishimura T (2012) DNA methylation in plants: relationship to small RNAs and histone modifications, and functions in transposon inactivation. PLANT CELL PHYSIOL 53:766-784   DOI
22 Wakasa K, Widholm JM (1987) A 5-methyltryptophan resistant rice mutant, MTR1, selected in tissue-culture. THEOR APPL GENET 74:49-54   DOI
23 Shan Q, Zhang Y, Chen K, Zhang K, Gao C (2015) Creation of fragrant rice by targeted knockout of the OsBADH2 gene using TALEN technology. PLANT BIOTECHNOL J 13: 791-800   DOI
24 Shukla VK, Doyon, Y, Miller JC, DeKelver RC, Moehle EA, Worden SE, Mitchell JC, Arnold NL, Gopalan S, Meng X, Choi VM, Rock JM, Wu YY, Katibah GE, Zhifang G, McCaskill D, Simpson MA, Blakeslee B, Greenwalt SA, Butler HJ, Hinkley SJ, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, Gregory PD, Urnov FD (2009) Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. NATURE 459:437-441   DOI
25 Takagi H, Tamiru M, Abe A, Yoshida K, Uemura A, Yaegashi H, Obara T, Oikawa K, Utsushi H, Kanzaki E, Mitsuoka C, Natsume S, Kosugi S, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, Urasaki N, Kamoun S, Terauchi R (2015) MutMap accelerates breeding of a salt-tolerant rice cultivar. NAT BIOTECHNOL 33:445-449   DOI
26 Van der Hoorn RA, Laurent F, Roth R, De Wit PJ (2000) Agroinfiltration is a versatile tool that facilitates comparative analyses of Avr9/Cf-9-Induced and Avr4/Cf-4-induced necrosis. MOL PLANT MICROBE INTERACTIONS 13:439-46   DOI
27 Voytas DF and Gao C (2014) Precision genome engineering and agriculture: opportunities and regulatory challenges. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001877   DOI
28 Wu X, Johansen JV, Helin K (2013) Fbxl10/Kdm2b recruits polycomb repressive complex 1 to CpG islands and regulates H2A ubiquitylation. MOL CELL 49:1134-1146   DOI
29 Yan J, Shah T, Warburton ML, Buckler ES, McMullen MD, Crouch J (2009) Genetic characterization and linkage disequilibrium estimation of a global maize collection using SNP markers. PLOS ONE 4:e8451   DOI
30 Zhou X, Jacobs TB, Xue LJ, Harding SC, Tsai CJ (2015) Exploiting SNPs for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the out crossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4-coumarate:CoA ligase specificity and redundancy. NEW PHYTOL 208:298-301   DOI