Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2010.37.2.115

Current status on plant functional genomics  

Cho, Yong-Gu (Department of Crop Science, Chungbuk National University)
Woo, Hee-Jong (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA)
Yoon, Ung-Han (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA)
Kim, Hong-Sig (Department of Crop Science, Chungbuk National University)
Woo, Sun-Hee (Department of Crop Science, Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Plant Biotechnology / v.37, no.2, 2010 , pp. 115-124 More about this Journal
Abstract
As the completion of genome sequencing, large collection of expression data and the great efforts in annotating plant genomes, the next challenge is to systematically assign functions to all predicted genes in the genome. Functional genome analysis of plants has entered the high-throughput stage. The generations and collections of mutants at the genome-wide level form technological platform of functional genomics. However, to identify the exact function of unknown genes it is necessary to understand each gene's role in the complex orchestration of all gene activities in the plant cell. Gene function analysis therefore necessitates the analysis of temporal and spatial gene expression patterns. The most conclusive information about changes in gene expression levels can be gained from analysis of the varying qualitative and quantitative changes of messenger RNAs, proteins and metabolites. New technologies have been developed to allow fast and highly parallel measurements of these constituents of the cell that make up gene activity. We have reviewed currently employed technologies to identify unknown functions of predicted genes including map-based cloning, insertional mutagenesis, reverse genetics, chemical mutagenesis, microarray analysis, FOX-hunting system, gene silencing mutagenesis, proteomics and chemical genomics. Recent improvements in technologies for functional genomics enable whole-genome functional analysis, and thus open new avenues for studies of the regulations and functions of unknown genes in plants.
Keywords
Functional genomics; gene identification; insertional mutagenesis; mutants; map-based cloning; reverse genetics; microarray; FOX-hunting system; gene silencing; proteomics; chemical genomics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Triques K, Piednoir E, Dalmais M, et al. (2008) Mutation detection using ENDO1: application to disease diagnostics in humans and TILLING and Eco-TILLING in plants. BMC Mol Biol. 9:42-51   DOI
2 Vitha S, Froehlich JE, Koksharova O, Pyke KA, van Erp H, Osteryoung KW (2003) ARC6 is a J-domain plastid division protein and an evolutionary descendant of the cyanobacterial cell division protein Ftn2. Plant Cell 15:1918-1933   DOI
3 Wesley SV, Helliwell CA, Smith NA, et al. (2001) Construct design for efficient, effective and high-throughput gene silencing in plants. Plant J. 27:581-590   DOI
4 Wilkins MR, Sanchez JC, Gooley AA, Appel RD, Humphery-Smith I, Hochstrasser DF, Williams KL (1996) Progress with proteome projects: why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 13:19-50   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Wu JL, Wu C, Lei C, et al. (2005) Chemical- and irradiation-induced mutants of indica rice IR64 for forward and reverse genetics. Plant Mol Biol. 59:85-97   DOI
6 Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L, Fuse T, Baba T, Yamamoto K, Umehara Y, Nagamura Y, Sasaki T (2000) Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12: 2473-2484   DOI
7 Zheng Z, Mosher SL, Fan B, Klessig DF and Chen Z (2007) Functional analysis of Arabidopsis WRKY25 transcription factor in plant defense against Pseudomonas syringae. BMC Plant Biology 7:1-13   DOI
8 Zolman BK, Martinez N, Millius A, Adham AR, Bartel B (2008) Identification and characterization of Arabidopsis indole-3-butyric acid response mutants defective in novel peroxisomal enzymes. Genetics 180:237-251   DOI
9 Seki M, Masakazu S, Tetsuya S, Kenji A, Kei I, Junko I, et al. (2004) RIKEN arabidopsis full‐lenth (RAFL) cDNA and its applications for expression profiling under abiotic stress conditions. J. Experimental Botany 55:213-223
10 Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2007) Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot. 58:221-227   DOI
11 Somerville C and Dangl J (2000) Plant Biology in 2010. Science 290:2077-2078   DOI
12 Song WY, Wang GL, Chen LL, Kim HS, Pi LY, et al. (1995) A receptor kinase-like protein encoded by the rice disease resistance gene Xa21. Science 270:1804-1806   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, et al. (2008) The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): gene structure and function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 36(Database issue):D1009-14   DOI
14 Sweeney MT, Thomson MJ, Pfeil BE, McCouch SR (2006) Caught red-handed: Rc encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein conditioning red pericarp in rice. Plant Cell 18:283-294   DOI
15 Sweeney MT, Thomson MJ, Cho YG, Park YJ, Wiliamson SH, et al. (2007) Golbal dissemination of a single mutation conferring white pericarp in rice. PLoS Genetics 3(8):e133.doi:10.1371   DOI
16 The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796-815   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Till BJ, Cooper J, Tai TH, et al. (2007) Discovery of chemically induced mutations in rice by TILLING. BMC Plant Biol. 7:19   DOI
18 Park DS, Park SK, Han AI, Wang HJ, Jun NS, Manigbas NL, et al. (2009) Genetic variation through Dissociation(Ds) insertional mutagenesis system for rice in Korea : progress and current ststus. Molecular Breeding 24:1-15   DOI
19 Triques K, Sturbois B, Gallais S, et al. (2007) Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana mismatch specific endonucleases: application to mutation discovery by TILLING in pea. Plant J. 51:1116-1125   DOI
20 Nakamura H, Makoto H, Kou A, Akio M, Naoko T, Mariko K, et al. (2007) A genome‐wide gain-of-function analysis of rice genes using the FOX‐hunting system. Plant Mol. Biol. 65:357-371   DOI
21 Rensink WA, Buell CR. (2005) Microarray expression profiling resources for plant genomics. Trends Plant Sci. 10:603-609   DOI
22 Ryu HS, Ryoo NY, Jung KH, An JH, Jeon JS (2010) Rice Functional Genomics Using T-DNA Mutants. Journal of Plant Biotechnology 37(2):133-143   DOI
23 Rice Annotation Project (2007) Curated genome annotation of Oryza sativa ssp. japonica and comparative genome analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res 17:175-183   DOI
24 Satoh K, Doi K, Nagata T, Kishimoto N, Suzuki K, Otomo Y, et al. (2007) Gene organization in rice revealed by full-length cDNA mapping and gene expression analysis through microarray. PLoS One. 2:e1235   DOI
25 Salmeron JM, Oldroyd GE, Rommens CM, Scofield SR, Kim SR, Lavelle DT, Dahlbeck D, Staskawicz BJ (1996) Tomato Prf is a member of leucine-rich repeat class of plant disease resistance genes and lies embedded within the Pto kinase gene cluster. Cell 86:123-133   DOI
26 Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, et. al. (2010) Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463:178-183   DOI
27 Li X, Cordero I, Caplan J, Molhoj M, Reiter WD (2004) Molecular analysis of 10 coding regions from Arabidopsis that are homologous to the MUR3 xyloglucan galactosyltransferase. Plant Physiol 134:940-950   DOI
28 Schreiber SL (2003) The small-molecule approach to biology: chemical genetics and diversity-oriented organic synthesis make possible the systematic exploration of biology. Chem Eng News 81:51-61
29 Lee TH, Kim YK, Pham TT, Song SI, Kim JK, et al. (2009) RiceArrayNet: a database for correlating gene expression from transcriptome profiling, and its application to the analysis of coexpressed genes in rice. Plant Physiol. 151:16-33   DOI
30 Leonhardt N, Kwak JM, Robert N, Waner D, Leonhardt G, Schroeder JI (2004) Microarray expression analyses of Arabidopsis guard cells and isolation of a recessive abscisic acid hypersensitive protein phosphatase 2C mutant. Plant Cell 16:596-615   DOI
31 Martienssen RA (1998) Functional genomics: probing plant gene function and expression with transposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2021-2026   DOI
32 Martin GB, Brommonschenkel SH, Chunwongse J, Frary A, Ganal MW, Spivey R, Wu T, Earle ED, Tanksley SD (1993) Map-based cloning of a protein kinase gene conferring disease resistance in tomato. Science 262:1432-1436   DOI
33 McCallum CM, Comai L, Greene EA, et al. (2000) Targeting induced local lessions in genomes (TILLING) for plant functional genomics. Plant Physiol. 123:439-442   DOI
34 McKinney EC, Ali N, Traut A, Feldmann KA, Belostotsky DA, McDowell JM, Meagher RB (1995) Sequence-based identification of T-DNA insertion mutations in Arabidopsis: actin mutants act2-1 and act4-1. Plant J 8:613-622   DOI
35 Jung KH, An G, Ronald PC (2008) Towards a better bowl of rice: assigning function to tens of thousands of rice genes. Nat Rev Genet 9:91-101
36 Miyao A, Tanaka K, Murata K, Sawaki H, Takeda S, Abe K, Shinozuka Y, Onosato K, Hirochika H (2003) Target site specificity of the Tos17 retrotransposon shows a preference for insertion within genes and against insertion in retrotransposon rich regions of the genome. Plant Cell 15:1771-1780   DOI
37 Jiang SY and Ramachandran S (2010) Natural and artificial mutants as valuable resources for functional genomics and molecular breeding. Int J Biol Sci 6:228-251   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Jorgensen RA, Que Q, Stam M (1999) Do unintended antisense transcripts contribute to sense co-suppression in plants? Trends Genet. 15:11-12   DOI
39 Kagawa T, Sakai T, Suetsugu N, Oikawa K, Ishiguro S, Kato T, Tabata S, Okada K, Wada M (2001) Arabidopsis NPL1: a phototropin homolog controlling the chloroplast high-light avoidance response. Science 291:2138-2141   DOI
40 Kempin SA, Liljegren SJ, Block LM, Rounsley SD, Lam E, Yanofsky MF (1997) Inactivation of the Arabidopsis AGL5 MADS-box gene by homologous recombination. Nature 389:802-803   DOI
41 Kikuchi S, Satoh K, Nagata T, Kawagashira N, et al. (2003) Collection, Mapping, and Annotation of Over 28,000 cDNA Clones from Japonica Rice, Science 301:376-379   DOI
42 Krieg DR (1963) Ethyl methanesulfonate-induced reversion of bacteriophage T4rII mutants. Genetics 48:561-580
43 Kusaba M (2004) RNA interference in crop plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 15:139-143   DOI
44 Lee GS, Park SH, Yun DW, Ahn BO, Kim CG, Han CD, Yi GW, Park DS, Eu MY, Yoon WH (2010) Current status of Ac/Ds mediated Gene Tagging Systems for Study of Rice Functional Genomics in Korea. Journal of Plant Biotechnology 3(2):125-132
45 Hirochika H (2001) Contribution of the Tos17 retrotransposon to rice functional genomics. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4:118-122   DOI
46 Lee IH, Jung YJ, Park JI, Nou IS, Kang KK (2010) Systematic approaches to identify functional genes using the FOXhunting system in Chinese cabbage. Journal of Plant Biotechnology 37(2):174-185   DOI
47 Furutani I, Sukegawa S, Kyozuka J (2006) Genome-wide analysis of spatial and temporal gene expression in rice panicle development. Plant J. 46:503-511   DOI
48 Gilliland LU, McKinney EC, Asmussen MA, Meagher RB (1998) Detection of deleterious genotypes in multigenerational studies. I. Disruptions in individual Arabidopsis actin genes. Genetics 149:717-725
49 Hirsch RE, Lewis BD, Spalding EP, Sussman MR (1998) A role for AKT1 potassium channel in plant nutrition. Science 280:918-921   DOI
50 Ichikawa T, Nakazawa M, Kawashima M, Iizumi H, Kuroda H, et al. (2006) The FOX hunting system: an alternative gain‐offunction gene hunting technique. Plant J. 48:974-985   DOI
51 International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860-921   DOI
52 International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (2005) The mapbased sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436:793-800   DOI
53 Jain M, Khurana JP (2009) Transcript profiling reveals diverse roles of auxin-responsive genes during reproductive development and abiotic stress in rice. FEBS J. 276:3148-3162   DOI
54 Jander G, Baerson SR, Hudak JA, et al. (2003) Ethyl methaesulfonate saturation mutagenesis in Arabidopsis to determine frequency of herbicide resistance. Plant Physiol. 131:139-146   DOI
55 Arumuganathan K and Earle ED (1991) Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Mol Bio Rep 9:229-233   DOI
56 Jeon JS, Lee s, Jung KH, Jun SH, Jeong DH, Lee J, Kim C, Jang S, et al. (2000) T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for functional genomics in rice. Plant J 22:561-570   DOI
57 Adham AR, Zolman BK, Millius A, Bartel B (2005) Mutations in Arabidopsis acyl-CoA oxidase genes reveal distinct and overlapping roles in beta-oxidation. Plant J 41:859-874   DOI
58 Azpiroz-Leehan R, Feldmann KA (1997) T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis: going back and forth. Trends Genet 13:152-156   DOI
59 Baulcombe DC (1996) RNA as a target and an initiator of post-transcriptional gene silencing in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol. 32:79-82   DOI
60 Bechtold N, Ellis J, Pelletier G (1993) In planta Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer by infiltration of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants. C R Acad Sci Ser III 316:1194–1199
61 Brummell DA, Balint-Kurti P, Harpster MH, et al. (2003) Inverted repeat of a heterologous 3'-untranslated region for highefficiency, high-throughput gene silencing. Plant J. 33:798-800
62 Chin HG, Choe MS, Lee SH, Park SH, Koo JC, Kim NY, et al. (1999) Molecular analysis of rice plants harboring an Ac/Ds transposable element-mediated gene trapping system. Plant J 19:615-623   DOI
63 Degenkolbe T, Do PT, Zuther E, Repsilber D, Walther D, Hincha DK, Kohl KI (2009) Expression profiling of rice cultivars differing in their tolerance to long-term drought stress. Plant Mol Biol. 69:133-153   DOI
64 Fields, S (2001) Proteomics. Proteomics in genomeland. Science 291:1221-1224
65 Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, et al. (2000) The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287:2185-2195   DOI
66 Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S, Knaap E, Cong B, Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley SD (2000) Fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289:85-88   DOI