Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2006.33.3.171

Current Status and Perspective and Future Task in Korea of Crop Genetic Transformation  

Harn, Chee-Hark (Biotechnology Institute, Nongwoo Bio Co.)
Publication Information
Journal of Plant Biotechnology / v.33, no.3, 2006 , pp. 171-184 More about this Journal
Abstract
According to ISAAA report, the global area of genetically modified (GM) crops increased more than 50 fold during the ten-year period from 1996 to 2005 with a sustained double-digit growth rate of 10%. This biotechnology adoption is one of the highest rates of technology adoption in agriculture history and this phenomenon indicates that the industrial value of the GM crops is highly perspective. In addition, the year 2010, 60% of cereal seeds in the global market would be GM or biotechnology related seeds so that the GM crop regards as the second green revolution that could provide a huge impact to food and agriculture. Nevertheless, there has not been any GM variety ever successfully commercialized in Korea and even none of the GM crops has ever been approved for safety testing by risk assessment. This seems that Korean agriculture industry might be indeed lost in the war of future seed market. However, lots of evidence show that Korean scientists have established advanced technologies and protocols to develop GM crops for last 20 years. Actually there have been many cases of successful transformation of crops that were previously known very difficult in transforming. Therefore, Korean agbiotechnology arena firmly holds an infrastructure for developing GM crops with a superior technology. Then what were the problems? Why has even a single GM crop not been commercialized in Korea? The tardiness shown by business in adopting the GM crop is caused by many factors: academical weakness, poor research funding, short knowledge of risk assessment, public concern, no successful experience, lack of professional leaders on GM variety development, lack of systems toward industrialization and inappropriate target transgenes from the beginning. In order to catch up in the race for the new green industry, each one of us in private sectors alongside academia and national research institutes needs to focus altogether on what can be done best in terms of choosing crops, investing fund and establishing a road map for commercialization of GM crops.
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Black R (2004) BBC News. Europe Gives Transgenic Seed Green Light. Agbioview at www.agbioworld.org; September 9
2 Clive James (2004) Global status of commercialized transgenic crops ISAAA
3 Clive James (2005) Global status of commercialized transgenic crops ISAAA
4 Kim JH (2006) LMOs research development. 2006 Biosafety white paper. Korea Biosafety Clearing House (KBCH) of KRIBB. I will publishing Co. 214-234
5 NIAS: National Institute of Agrobiological Science in Japan (2004) Field trial of genetically modified crops. News 13
6 IAPTC&B: The international Association for Plant Tissue Culture & Biotechnology (2006) Biotechnology and sustainable agriculture 2006 and beyond. Proceeding of 11 th IAPTC&B congress. Beijing, China. August 13-18
7 KBCH: Korea Biosafety Clearing House (KBCH) of KRIBB (2006) Introduction of private sector: Pioneer Hi-Bredinternational, Inc. Biosafety 7: 102-106
8 Harn CH (2004) Advantages of GM crops. Korea Biosafety Clearing House (KBCH) of KRIBB. Biosafety 5: 8-15
9 KSPGT: Korean Society of Plant Genetic Transformation. Transformation of crops. Jeong Mun Kak publishing Co. in press
10 NIAB: National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology of Rural Development Administration. Guideline for environmental risk assessment of GM crops: for public. Registration number: 11-1390564-000045-14.2006, 1-13
11 Ham CH (2004) Role of scientists developing LMO 'regarding the safety and improvement of system for commercialization. Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology. May 7-8. Proceeding of 2004 Spring Congress. 75-78