Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9709/JKSS.2012.21.4.011

Comparison of DBR with CONWIP in a Production Line with Constant Processing Times  

Lee, Hochang (경희대학교 경영대학 경영학부)
Seo, Dong-Won (경희대학교 경영대학 경영학부)
Abstract
We compared a DBR(drum-buffer-rope) system with a CONWIP(constant work-in-process) system in a production line with constant processing times. Based on the observation that a WIP-controlled line production system such as DBR and CONWIP is equivalent to a m-node tandem queue with finite buffer, we applied a max-plus algebra based solution method for the tandem queue to evaluate the performance of two systems. Numerical examples with 6 workstations were also used to demonstrate the proposed analysis. The mathematical analyses support that CONWIP outperforms DBR in terms of expected waiting time and WIP. Unlike the CONWIP case, sequencing workstations in a DBR affects the performance of the system. Delaying a bottleneck station in a DBR reduces expected waiting time.
Keywords
CONWIP; DBR; tandem queue; max-plus linear system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Spearman, M. L. and Zazanis, M. A., "Push and pull production systems: issues and comparisons", Operations Research, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 521-532, 1992.   DOI
2 Spencer, M. S. and Cox, J. F., "Master production scheduling development in a theory of constraints environment", Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 80-94, 1995.
3 Ye, T. and Han, W., "Determination of buffer sizes for drum-buffer-rope controlled production system", IJPR, Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 2827-2844, 2008.   DOI
4 Ayhan, H. and Seo, D.-W., "Laplace transform and moments of waiting times in Poisson driven (Max,+) linear systems", QUESTA, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 405-438, 2001.
5 Ayhan, H. and Seo, D.-W., "Tail probability of transient and stationary waiting times in (Max,+) linear systems", IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 151-157, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Baccelli, F., Cohen, G., Olsder, G. J. and Quadrat, J-P, Synchronization and Linearity: An Algebra for Discrete Event Systems, John Wiley and Sons, 1992.
7 Baccelli, F. and Schmidt, V., "Taylor series expansions for Poisson driven (Max,+) linear systems", Annals of Applied Probability, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 138-185, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Baccelli, F., Hasenfuss, S. and Schmidt, V., "Transient and stationary waiting times in (max,+) linear systems with Poisson input", QUESTA, Vol. 26, pp. 301-342, 1997.
9 Bonvik, A. M., Dallery, Y. and Gershwin, S. B., "Approximate analysis of production system operated by a CONWIP/ finite buffer hybrid control policy", IJPR, Vol. 38, No. 13, pp. 2845-2869, 2000.   DOI
10 Baccelli, F., Hasenfuss, S. and Schmidt, V., "Expansions for steady state characteristics in (Max,+) linear systems", Stochastic Models, Vol. 14, pp. 1-24, 1998.   DOI
11 Chang, T. M. and Yih, Y., "Generic Kanban systems for dynamic environments", IJPR, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 889-902, 1994.   DOI
12 Cook, D. P., "Simulation comparison of traditional, JIT, and TOC manufacturing systems in a flow shop with bottlenecks", Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 35, pp. 73-78, 1994.
13 Duenyas, I., Hopp, W. J. and Spearman, M. L., "Characterizing the output process of a CONWIP line with deterministic processing and random outages", Management Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 975-988, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Gilland, W., "A simulation study comparing performance of CONWIP and bottleneck-based release rules", Production Planning, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 211-219, 2002.   DOI
15 Goldratt, E. M. and Cox, J., The Goal, Croton-on-Hudson, NY, North River Press, Inc., 1984.
16 Goldratt, E. M. and Fox, R. E., The Race, Croton-on-Hudson, NY, North River Press, Inc., 1986.
17 Gstettner, S. and Kuhn, H., "Analysis of production control systems Kanban and CONWIP", IJPR, Vol. 34, No. 11, pp. 3253-3273, 1996.   DOI
18 Heidergott, B., Max-plus linear stochastic systems and perturbation analysis, Springer, 2006.
19 Jodlbauer, H. and Huber, A., "Service level performance of MRP, Kanban, CONWIP and DBR due to parameter stability and environmental robustness", IJPR, Vol. 46, No. 8, pp. 2179-2195, 2008.   DOI
20 Koh, S. G. and Bulfin, R. L., "Comparison of DBR with CONWIP in an Unbalanced Production Line with Three Stations", IJPR, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 391-404, 2004.   DOI
21 Lee, H. and Seo, D.-W., "Performance evaluation of Kanban-controlled line production systems with constant processing times", Productivity Review, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 183-205, 2010.
22 Lee, H. and Seo, D.-W., "Comparison of CONWIP with Kanban in a production line with constant processing times", J. Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 51-65, 2011.
23 Louw, L. and Page, D. C., "Queuing network analysis approach for estimating the sizes of the time buffers in Theory of Constraints-controlled production systems", IJPR, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 1207-1226, 2004.   DOI
24 Muckstadt, J. A. and Tayur, S. R., "A comparison of alternative Kanban control mechanism: I. background and structural results", IIE Transaction, Vol. 27, pp. 140-150, 1995.   DOI
25 Muckstadt, J. A. and Tayur, S. R., "A comparison of alternative Kanban control mechanism: II. experimental results", IIE Transaction, Vol. 27, pp. 151-161, 1995.   DOI
26 Radovilsky, Z. D., "A quantitative approach to estimate the size of the time buffer in the theory of constraints", IJPE, Vol. 55, pp. 113-119, 1998.
27 Roderick, L. M., Toland, J. and Rodriguez, F. P., "A simulation study of CONWIP versus MRP at Westinghouse", Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 26, pp. 237-242, 1994.   DOI
28 Schragenheim, E. and Ronen, B., "Drum-buffer-rope shop floor control", Production Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 18-22, 1990.
29 Spearman, M. L., Woodruff, D. L. and Hopp, W. J., "CONWIP: a pull alternative to Kanban", IJPR, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 879-894, 1990.   DOI