Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4051/ibc.2014.6.3.0002

Sex and Population Differences in Intelligence Are Partly Caused by Sexual Selection: Hn Evolutionary Hypothesis  

Piffer, Davide (Ulster Institute for Social Research)
Publication Information
Interdisciplinary Bio Central / v.6, no.4, 2014 , pp. 2.1-2.7 More about this Journal
Abstract
Sexual dimorphism in intelligence suggests that this phenotype is a sexually selected trait. This view is supported by an overrepresentation (compared to the autosomal genome) of genes affecting cognition on the X chromosome. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that sexual selection can explain sex and country-level differences in performance on tests of fluid intelligence. Nationally representative samples from N = 44 countries were obtained from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Creative Problem Solving (CPS), which evaluates the core of intelligence, that is novel problem solving ability. Sexual selection has the double effect of increasing the prevalence of a favored phenotype and reducing genetic variation in sexually selected traits. Matching these predictions from evolutionary theory, the average country fluid intelligence is positively correlated to sexual dimorphism after partialling out per capita GDP and the latter in turn is inversely correlated to variance in intelligence scores within populations. Males have a higher variance than females but there is a negative correlation between male-female difference in variance and sexual dimorphism in intelligence, suggesting that selection reduces variance more in the selected sex. Average country male height is negatively correlated to sexual dimorphism in intelligence, a fact that supports the notion of a trade-off between physical and intellectual competition in the context of access to females. The results of this study, if replicated, imply that genome-wide association studies of cognition may benefit from a focus on sex chromosomes, which so far have been neglected. Another implication of this study is that intelligence has continued to evolve after different human populations migrated out of Africa and possibly up to the 19th century, as suggested by the substantial variability in sex differences even between neighbouring countries.
Keywords
sexual selection; sexual dimorphism; X chromosome; intelligence; human evolution;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Colom, R., and Lynn, R. (2004). Testing the developmental theory of sex differences in intelligence on 12-18 year olds. Personality and Individual Differences 36, 75-82.   DOI
2 Flores-Mendoza, C., Widaman, K. F., Rindermann, H., Primi, R., Mansur-Alves, M., and Pena, C. C. (2013). Cognitive sex differences in reasoning tasks: evidence from Brazilian samples of educational settings. Intelligence 41, 70-84.   DOI
3 Lynn, R. (1999). Sex differences in intelligence and brain size : a developmental theory. Intelligence 27, 1-12.   DOI
4 Lynn, R., and Irwing, P. (2004). Sex differences on the progressive matrices: A meta-analysis. Intelligence 32, 481-498.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Nyborg, H. (2005). Sex-related differences in general intelligence g, brain size, and social status. Personality and Individual Differences 39, 497-509.   DOI
6 LoSasso, C. M. L. a. G. L. (2002). Discussions on Genius and Intelligence. Mega Foundation Interview with Arthur Jensen. (NY: Mega Press).
7 Barkow, J. H. C. L. T. J. (1992). The Adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
8 Kaplan, H., and Hill, K. (1985). Hunting Ability and Reproductive Success Among Male Ache Foragers: Preliminary Results. Current Anthropology 26, 131-133.   DOI
9 Smith, E. (2004). Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success? Hum Nat 15, 343-364.   DOI
10 Fisher, R. A. (1931). The Evolution of Dominance. Biological Reviews 6, 345-368.   DOI
11 Lande, R. (1980). Sexual Dimorphism, Sexual Selection, and Adaptation in Polygenic Characters. Evolution 34, 292-305.   DOI
12 Hurst, L. D. (2001). Evolutionary genomics - Sex and the X. Nature 411, 149-150.   DOI
13 Wang, P. J., McCarrey, J. R., Yang, F., and Page, D. C. (2001). An abundance of X-linked genes expressed in spermatogonia. Nature genetics 27, 422-426.   DOI
14 Lercher, M. J., Urrutia, A. O., and Hurst, L. D. (2003). Evidence that the human X chromosome is enriched for male-specific but not femalespecific genes. Mol Biol Evol 20, 1113-1116.   DOI
15 Reinhold, K. (1998). Sex linkage among genes controlling sexually selected traits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44, 1-7.   DOI
16 Skuse, D. H. (2005). X-linked genes and mental functioning. Hum Mol Genet 14 Spec No 1, R27-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Gecz, J. (2004). The molecular basis of intellectual disability: novel genes with naturally occurring mutations causing altered gene expression in the brain. Frontiers in bioscience: a journal and virtual library 9, 1-7.   DOI
18 Ropers, H. H., and Hamel, B. C. (2005). X-linked mental retardation. Nature reviews Genetics 6, 46-57.   DOI
19 Delbridge, M., McMillan, D., Doherty, R., Deakin, J., and Graves, J. (2008). Origin and evolution of candidate mental retardation genes on the human X chromosome (MRX). BMC Genomics 9, 65.   DOI
20 Crespi, B., Summers, K., and Dorus, S. (2010). Evolutionary genomics of human intellectual disability. Evolutionary Applications 3, 52-63.   DOI
21 Fitzpatrick, M. J. (2004). Pleiotropy and the genomic location of sexually selected genes. Am Nat 163, 800-808.   DOI
22 Piffer, D. (2014). Opposite selection pressures on stature and intelligence across human populations. Open Behavioral Genetics.
23 Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
24 Tomkins, J. L., Radwan, J., Kotiaho, J. S., and Tregenza, T. (2004). Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol Evol 19, 323-328.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Van Homrigh, A., Higgie, M., McGuigan, K., and Blows, M. W. (2007). The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection. Current biology : CB 17, 528-532.   DOI
26 OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving (Volume V). OECD Publishing.
27 Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28 Leutenegger, W., and Cheverud, J. (1982). Correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates: ecological and size variables. Int J Primatol 3, 387-402.   DOI
29 Bank, T. W. (2014). GDP per capita, PPP (current international $)", World Development Indicators database. [cited]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?order=wbapi_data_value_2013+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_data_value-last&sort=desc.
30 Lynn, R. V. T. (2006). IQ and global inequality. Augusta, Ga.: Washington Summit Publishers.
31 Lynn, R. V. T. (2012). Intelligence: a unifying construct for the social sciences. Ulster Institute for Social Research.
32 Rindermann, H. (2012). Intellectual classes, technological progress and economic development: the rise of cognitive capitalism. Personality and Individual Differences 53, 108-113.   DOI
33 Programme, U. N. D. (2012). [cited]. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii.
34 Sailer, S. (2012). Occam's Butter Knife. Taki's Magazine [cited]. Available from: http://takimag.com/article/occams_butter_knife_steve_sailer.