Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2022.31.3.221

Analysis of Spatial and Vertical Variability of Environmental Parameters in a Greenhouse and Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Concentration in Two Different Types of Greenhouses  

Jeong, Young Ae (Department of Agriculture and Life Science, Korea National Open University)
Jang, Dong Cheol (Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Kwon, Jin Kyung (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Energy and Environmental Engineering Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences)
Kim, Dae Hyun (Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Choi, Eun Young (Department of Agricultural Science, Korea National Open University)
Publication Information
Journal of Bio-Environment Control / v.31, no.3, 2022 , pp. 221-229 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was aimed to investigate spatial and vertical characteristics of greenhouse environments according to the location of the environmental sensors, and to investigate the correlations between temperature, light intensity, and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration according to the type of greenhouse. Temperature, relative humidity (RH), CO2, and light sensors were installed in the four-different vertical positions of the whole canopy as well as ground and roof space at the five spatial locations of the Venlo greenhouse. Also, correlations between temperature, light intensity, and CO2 concentration in Venlo and semi-closed greenhouses were analyzed using the Curve Expert Professional program. The deviations among the spatial locations were larger in the CO2 concentration than other environmental factors in the Venlo greenhouse. The average CO2 concentration ranged from 465 to 761 µmol·mol-1 with the highest value (646 µmol·mol-1) at the Middle End (4ME) close to the main pipe (50Ø) of the liquefied CO2 gas supply and lowest (436 µmol·mol-1) at the Left Middle (5LM). The deviation among the vertical positions was greater in temperature and relative humidity than other environments. The time zone with the largest deviation in average temperature was 2 p.m. with the highest temperature (26.51℃) at the Upper Air (UA) and the lowest temperature (25.62℃) at the Lower Canopy (LC). The time zone with the largest deviation in average RH was 1 p.m. with the highest RH (76.90%) at the LC and the lowest RH (71.74%) at the UA. The highest average CO2 concentration at each hour was Roof Air (RF) and Ground (GD). The coefficient of correlations between temperature, light intensity, and CO2 concentration were 0.07 for semi-closed greenhouse and 0.66 for Venlo greenhouse. All the results indicate that while the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse needs to be analyzed in the spatial locations, temperature and humidity needs to be analyzed in the vertical positions of canopy. The target CO2 fertilization concentration for the semi-closed greenhouse with low ventilation rate should be different from that of general greenhouses.
Keywords
carbon dioxide fertilization; coefficient of determination; infrared leaf temperature sensor; semi-closed greenhouse; Venlo greenhouse;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee Y.B., and B.Y. Lee 1994, Effect of long-term CO2 enrichment on leaf temperature, diffusion resistance, and photosynthetic rate in tomato plant. J Korean Soc Hortic Sci 35:421-428. (in Korean)
2 Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) 2021, Agricultural area survey. Available via https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1ET0017&conn_path=I2
3 Mortensen L.M., and F. Ringsevjen 2020, Semi-closed greenhouse photosynthesis measurements: A future standard in intelligent climate control. Eur J Hortic Sci 85:219-225. doi:10.17660/eJHS.2020/85.4.2   DOI
4 Qian T. 2017, Crop growth and development in closed and semi-closed greenhouses. PhD thesis, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, The Netherlands. doi:10.18174/403466   DOI
5 Stitt M. 1991, Rising CO2 levels and their potential significance for carbon flow in photosynthetic cells. Plant Cell Environ 14:741-762. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01440.x   DOI
6 Woo Y.H., H.J. Kim, T.Y. Kim, K.D. Kim, E.Y. Nam, I.H. Cho, K.H. Hong, and K.H. Lee 2005, Effect of high temperature adaptable improvement of spray type chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum) of greenhouse according to carbon dioxide treatment at summer. J Bio-Env Con 14:100-104. (in Korean)
7 Jeong C.S., I.S. Kim, K.C. Yoo, S.S. Kim, D.H. Cho, and Y.R. Yeoung 1996, Effects of CO2 enrichment on the net photosynthesis, yield, content of sugar and organic acid in strawberry fruits. J Korean Soc Hortic Sci 37:736-740. (in Korean)
8 Lee J.K., D.H. Kang, S.H. Oh, and D.H. Lee 2020, Strategies about optimal measurement matrix of environment factors inside plastic greenhouse. Protected Hort Plant Fac 29:161-170. (in Korean) doi:10.12791/ksbec.2020.29.2.161   DOI
9 Marcelis L.F.M., F. Buwalda, J.A. Dieleman, T.A. Dueck, A. Elings, A. de Gelder, S. Hemming, F.L.K. Kempkes, T. Li, and F. van Noort 2014, Innovations in crop production: A matter of physiology and technology. Acta Hortic 1037:39-45. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1037.1   DOI
10 Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) 2020b, Greenhouse status and production performance of vegetables grown in facility 2017-2020. Available via https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=114&tblId=DT_114018_011&conn_path=I2)
11 Koch G.W., and H.A. Mooney 1996, Response of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated CO2: A synthesis and summary. In GH Koch, HA Mooney, eds, Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, pp 415-429.
12 Hong S.W., and I.B. Lee 2014, Predictive model of microenvironment in a naturally ventilated greenhouse for a modelbased control approach. Protected Hort Plant Fac 23:181-191. (in Korean) doi:10.12791/ksbec.2014.23.3.181   DOI
13 Keutgen N., K. Chen, and F. Lenz 1997, Responses of strawberry leaf photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and macronutrient contents to elevated CO2. J Plant Physiol 150:395-400. doi:10.1016/S0176-1617(97)80088-0   DOI
14 Lee T.S., G.C. Kang, H.K. Kim, J.P. Moon, S.S. Oh, and J.K. Kwon 2017, Analysis of air temperature and humidity distributions and energy consumptions according to use of air circulation fans in a single-span greenhouse. Protected Hort Plant Fac 26:276-282. (in Korean) doi:10.12791/ksbec.2017.26.4.276   DOI
15 Dannehl D., M. Josuttis, S. Huyskens-Keil, C. Ulrichs, and U. Smidt 2014, Comparison of different greenhouse systems and their impact on plant responses of tomatoes. Gesunde Pflanz 66:111-119. doi:10.1007/s10343-014-0322-0   DOI
16 Esmeijer M.H. 1999, CO2 in greenhouse horticulture. Applied Plant Research, Aalsmeer/Naaldwijk, the Netherlands, pp 74-75.
17 Geelen P.A.M., J.O. Voogt, and P.A. van Weel 2018, Plant empowerment: The basic principles. plantempowerment academy, the Netherlands.
18 Rural Development Administration (RDA) 2021, Agricultural income survey 2013-2020. Available via https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=143&tblId=DT_143002_A000&conn_path=I2
19 Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) 2020a, Greenhouse status of vegetables grown in facilities 2015-2020. Available via https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=114&tblId=DT_114018_009&conn_path=I2
20 Morita R., K. Inoue, K.I. Ikeda, T. Hatanaka, M. Misoo, and H. Fukayama 2016, Starch content in leaf sheath controlled by CO2-responsive CCT protein is a potential determinant of photosynthetic capacity in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 57:2334-2341. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcw142   DOI
21 Bowes G. 1991, Growth at elevated CO2 : photosynthetic responses mediated through Rubisco. Plant Cell Environ 14:795-806. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01443.x   DOI
22 Cho A.R., S.H. Choi, and Y.J. Kim 2020, Flowering and photosynthetic responses of Phalaenopsis under elevated CO2 and nutrient supply. Hortic Sci Technol 38:595-607. (in Korean) doi:10.7235/HORT.20200055   DOI