Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2021.30.4.401

Comparison of Measured and Calculated Carboxylation Rate, Electron Transfer Rate and Photosynthesis Rate Response to Different Light Intensity and Leaf Temperature in Semi-closed Greenhouse with Carbon Dioxide Fertilization for Tomato Cultivation  

Choi, Eun-Young (Department of Agricultural Science, Korea National Open University)
Jeong, Young-Ae (Department of Agriculture and Life Science, Korea National Open University)
An, Seung-Hyun (Department of Agricultural Science, Korea National Open University)
Jang, Dong-Cheol (Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Dae-Hyun (Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Lee, Dong-Soo (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Energy and Environmental Engineering Division)
Kwon, Jin-Kyung (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Energy and Environmental Engineering Division)
Woo, Young-Hoe (Department of Horticulture Environment System, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries)
Publication Information
Journal of Bio-Environment Control / v.30, no.4, 2021 , pp. 401-409 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aimed to estimate the photosynthetic capacity of tomato plants grown in a semi-closed greenhouse using temperature response models of plant photosynthesis by calculating the ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax), maximum electron transport rate (Jmax), thermal breakdown (high-temperature inhibition), and leaf respiration to predict the optimal conditions of the CO2-controlled greenhouse, for maximizing the photosynthetic rate. Gas exchange measurements for the A-Ci curve response to CO2 level with different light intensities {PAR (Photosynthetically Active Radiation) 200µmol·m-2·s-1 to 1500µmol·m-2·s-1} and leaf temperatures (20℃ to 35℃) were conducted with a portable infrared gas analyzer system. Arrhenius function, net CO2 assimilation (An), thermal breakdown, and daylight leaf respiration (Rd) were also calculated using the modeling equation. Estimated Jmax, An, Arrhenius function value, and thermal breakdown decreased in response to increased leaf temperature (> 30℃), and the optimum leaf temperature for the estimated Jmax was 30℃. The CO2 saturation point of the fifth leaf from the apical region was reached at 600ppm for 200 and 400µmol·m-2·s-1 of PAR, at 800ppm for 600 and 800µmol·m-2·s-1 of PAR, at 1000ppm for 1000µmol of PAR, and at 1500ppm for 1200 and 1500µmol·m-2·s-1 of PAR levels. The results suggest that the optimal conditions of CO2 concentration can be determined, using the photosynthetic model equation, to improve the photosynthetic rates of fruit vegetables grown in greenhouses.
Keywords
Arrhenius function; net $CO_2$ assimilation; rubisco; saturation point; thermal breakdown;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Scarascia-Mugnozza G., P.D. Angelis, G. Matteucci, R. Valentini 1996, Long-term exposure to elevated [CO2] in a natural Quercus ilex L. community: Net photosynthesis and photochemical efficiency of PSII at different levels of water stress. Plant Cell Environ 19:643-654. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00399.x   DOI
2 Hikosaka K., K. Ishikawa, A. Borjigidai, O. Muller, and Y. Onoda 2006, Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis: mechanisms involved in the changes in temperature dependence of photosynthetic rate. J Exp Bot 57:291-302. doi:10.1093/jxb/erj049   DOI
3 Medlyn B.E., E. Dreyer, D. Ellsworth, M. Forstreuter, P.C. Harley, M.U.F. Kirschbaum, X. Le Roux, P. Montpied, J. Strassemeyer, A. Walcroft, K. Wang, and D. Loustau 2002b, Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data. Plant Cell Environ 25:1167-1179. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00891.x   DOI
4 Nederhoff E.M. 1987, Dynamic optimization of the CO2 concentration in greenhouses: an experiment with cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Acta Hortic 229:341-348. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1988.229.37   DOI
5 Sage R.F., and D.S. Kubien 2007, The temperature response of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 30:1086-1106. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01682.x   DOI
6 Sharkey T.D. 1985, Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants: physics, physiology and rate limitations. Bot Rev 51:53-105. doi:10.1007/BF02861058   DOI
7 Sharkey T.D., C.J. Bernacchi, G.D. Farquhar, and E.L. Singsaas 2007, Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves. Plant Cell Environ 30: 1035-1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01710.x   DOI
8 Kim D.E., J.K. Kwon, S.J. Hong, J.W. Lee, and Y.H. Woo 2020, The effect of greenhouse climate change by temporary shading at summer on photo respiration, leaf temperature and growth of cucumber. Protected Hort Plant Fac 29:306-312. (in Korean) doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2020.29.3.306   DOI
9 Leuning R. 2002, Temperature dependence of two parameters in a photosynthesis model. Plant Cell Environ 25:1205-1210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00898.x   DOI
10 Jung D.H., J.H. Shin, Y.Y. Cho, and J.E. Son 2015, Development of a two-variable spatial leaf photosynthetic model of irwin mango grown in greenhouse. Protected Hort Plant Fac 24:161-166. (in Korean) doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2015.24.3.161   DOI
11 Sanchez-Guerrero M.C., P. Lorenzo, E. Medrano, N. Castilla, T. Soriano, and A. Baille 2005, Effect of variable CO2 enrichment on greenhouse production in mild winter climates. Agric For Meteorol 132:244-252. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.07.014   DOI
12 Farquhar G.D., S. von Caemmerer, and J.A. Berry 1980, A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78-90. doi:10.1007/BF00386231   DOI
13 Caemmerer S.V. 2000, Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia. pp 1-165.
14 Kattge J., and W. Knorr W 2007, Temperature acclimation in a biochemical model of photosynthesis: a reanalysis of data from 36 species. Plant Cell Environ 30:1176-1190. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01690.x   DOI
15 Medlyn B.E., D. Loustau, and S. Delzon 2002a, Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. I. Seasonal changes in mature maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Plant Cell Environ 25:1155-1165. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00890.x   DOI
16 Peet M.M., and D.H. Willits 1987, Greenhouse CO2 enrichment alternatives-effects of increasing concentration or duration of enrichment on cucumber yields. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 112:236-241.   DOI
17 Harley P.C., R.B. Thomas, J.F. Reynolds, and B.R. Strain 1992, Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ 15:271-282. doi: https:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb00974.x   DOI
18 Bernacchi C.J., E.L. Singsaas, C. Pimentel, A.R. Portis, Jr and S.P. Long 2001, Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 24:253-259. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2001.00668.x   DOI
19 Campbell G.S., and JM. Norman 1998, Plants and plant communities. In GS Campbell and JM Norman, ed, Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. Springer, New York, pp 239-241.
20 Collatz G.J., J.T. Ball, C. Grivet, and J.A. Berry 1991, Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration-a model that includes a laminar boundary-layer. Agric For Meteorol 54:107-136. doi:10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8   DOI