Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2020.29.3.209

Assessment of Water Control Model for Tomato and Paprika in the Greenhouse Using the Penman-Monteith Model  

Somnuek, Siriluk (Renewable Energy Crop Institute, Department of Agriculture)
Hong, Youngsin (Division of Smart Farm Development, Department of Agricultural Engineer, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Minyoung (Division of Disaster Prevention Engineering, Department of Agricultural Engineer, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Sanggyu (Division of Smart Farm Development, Department of Agricultural Engineer, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Baek, Jeonghyun (Division of Smart Farm Development, Department of Agricultural Engineer, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Kwak, Kangsu (Division of Smart Farm Development, Department of Agricultural Engineer, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Hyondong (Division of Smart Farm Development, Department of Agricultural Engineer, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Jaesu (Division of Smart Farm Development, Department of Agricultural Engineer, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Publication Information
Journal of Bio-Environment Control / v.29, no.3, 2020 , pp. 209-218 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper investigated actual crop evapotranspiration (ETc) of tomato and paprika planted in test beds of the greenhouse. Crop water requirement (CWR) is the amount of water required to compensate ETc loss from the crop. The main objectives of the study are to assess whether the actual crop watering (ACW) was adequate CWR of tomato and paprika and which amount of ACW should be irrigated to each crop. ETc was estimated using the Penman-Monteith model (P-M) for each crop. ACW was calculated from the difference of amount of nutrient supply water and amount of nutrient drainage water. ACW and CWR of each crop were determined, compared and assessed. Results indicated CWR-tomato was around 100 to 1,200 ml/day, while CWR-paprika ranged from 100 to 500 ml/day. Comparison of ACW and CWR of each crop found that the difference of ACW and CWR are fluctuated following day of planting (DAP). However, the differences could divide into two phases, first the amount of ACWs of each crop are less than CWR in the initial phase (60 DAP) around 500 ml/day and 91 ml/day, respectively. Then, ACWs of each crop are greater than the CWR after 60 DAP until the end of cultivation approximately 400 ml/day in tomato and 178 ml/day in paprika. ETc assessment is necessary to correctly quantify crop irrigation water needs and it is an accurate short-term estimation of CWR in greenhouse for optimal irrigation scheduling. Thus, reducing ACW of tomato and paprika in the greenhouse is a recommendation. The amount of ACW of tomato should be applied from 100 to 1,200 ml/day and paprika is 100 to 500 ml/day depend on DAP.
Keywords
actual crop watering; crop evapotranspiration; crop water requirement; greenhouse; watering;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Choi, Y., M. Y. Kim, S. O'Shaughnessy, J. G. Jeon, Y. J. Kim, and W. J. Song. 2018. Comparison of artificial neural network and empirical models to determine daily reference evapotranspiration. Journal of the Korean society of agricultural engineer 60: 43-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.201860.6.043   DOI
2 Fernandez, M. D., S. S. Bonachela, F. Orgaz, R. Thompson, J. C. Lopez, M. R. Granados, M. Gallardo, and E. Fereres. 2010. Measurement and estimation of plastic greenhouse reference evapotranspiration in a Mediterranean climate. Irrigation science 28:497-509.   DOI
3 Harmanto, V., M. Salokhe, M. S. Babel, and H. J. Tantau. 2005. Water requirement of drip irrigated tomatoes grown in greenhouse in tropical environment. Agricultural water management 71:225-242.   DOI
4 Jayasekara, S. N., W. H. Na, A. B. Owababi, J. W. Lee, A. Rasheed, H. K. Kim, and H. W. Lee. 2018. Comparison of environmental conditions and insulation effect between air inflated and conventional double layer greenhouse. Protected horticulture and plant factory 27:46-53.   DOI
5 Lozano, C. S., R. Rezende, P. S. L. Freitas, T. L. Hachmann, F. A. S. Santos, and A. F. B. A. Andrean. 2017. Estimation of evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of melon cultivated in protected environment. Revista brasileira de engenharia agricola e ambiental 21:758-762.   DOI
6 Lizarraga, A., H. Boesveld, F. Huibers, and C. Robles. 2003. Evaluating irrigation scheduling of hydroponic tomato in Navarra, Spain. Irrigation and drainage 52:177-188.   DOI
7 Moazed, H., A. A. Ghaemi, and Rafiee, M. R. 2014. Evaluation of several reference evapotranspiration methods: a comparative study of greenhouse and outdoor condition. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology. Transactions of civil engineering 38:421-437.
8 Pamungkas, A. P., K. Hatou, and T. Morimoto. 2013. Modeling the evapotranspiration inside the greenhouse systems by using matlab simulink. In IFAC Proceedings Volumes 46: 33-37. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3182/20130327-3-JP-3017.00010
9 Papadakis, G., A. Frangoudakis, and S. Kyritsis. 1994. Experimental investigation and modelling of heat and mass transfer between a tomato crop and greenhouse environment. Journal of Agriculture engineering research 57:217-227.   DOI
10 Perez-Castro, A., J. A. Sanchez-Molina, M. Castilla, and J. Sanchez-Moreno. 2017. cFertigUAL: A fertigation management app for greenhouse vegetable crops. Agricultural water management 183:186-193.   DOI
11 Rahil, M. H. and A. Qanadillo. 2015. Effects of different irrigation regimes on yield and water use efficiency of cucumber crop. Agricultural water management 148:10-15.   DOI
12 Sharma, H., M. K. Shukla, P. W.Bosland, and R. Steiner. 2017. Soil moisture sensor calibration, actual evapotranspiration, and crop coefficients for drip irrigated greenhouse chile peppers. Agricultural water management 179:81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.001   DOI
13 Tan, C. S. 1990. Irrigation scheduling for fruit crop: low- volume drip or micro-sprinkler systems. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs of Canada. Accessed 15 July, 2019. Retrieved from http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/ english/crops/facts/90-069.htm#b.
14 Woo, Y. H., H. J. Kim, Y. I. Nam, I. H. Cho, and Y. S. Kwon. 2000. Predicting and measuring transpiration based on phyto monitoring of tomato in greenhouse. Protected horticulture and plant factory 41:459-463.
15 Yang, X., T. H. Short, R. D. Fox, and W. L. Bauerle. 1989. The Microclimate and transpiration of a greenhouse cucumber crop. American society of agricultural engineers 32:2143-2150.   DOI
16 Baek, J. H., J. W. Heo, H. H. Kim, Y. Hong, and J. S. Lee. 2018. Research platform design for the Korea smart greenhouse based on cloud computing. Protected horticulture and plant factory 27:27-33.   DOI
17 Aiswarya, L., K. Arunadevi, R. Lalitha, and S. Vallalkannan. 2019. Estimation of actual crop evapotranspiration of green chili in semi-arid region under different atmospheric condition. International journal of current microbiology and applied sciences 8:1104-1110. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.805.127   DOI
18 Albuquerque, F.S., E.F.F. Silva, J.A.C. Albuquerque Filho, and G.S. Lima. 2012. Water requirement and crop coefficient of fertigated sweet pepper. Brazilian journal of Irrigation and drainage 17:481-493.
19 Bakker, J. C., G. P. A. Bot, H. Challa, and N. J. van de Braak. 1995. Greenhouse Climate Control. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 15-160.
20 Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evaporation-guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO.
21 Baptista, F. J., B. J. Bailey, and J. Meneses. 2005. Measuring and modelling transpiration versus evapotranspiration of a tomato crop grown on soil in a Mediterranean greenhouse. Acta horticulture 691:313-320.   DOI
22 Chopda, A., A. P. Sahu, D. M. Das, B. Panigrahi, and S. C. Senapati. 2018. Variation in actual evapotranspiration of green chili inside and outside the rooftop greenhouse under deficit irrigation. International journal of current microbiology and applied sciences 7:4152-4159.   DOI
23 Costa, P. M., I. Pocas, and M. Cunha 2019. Modelling evapotranspiration of soilless cut roses "Red Naomi" based on climatic and crop predictors. Horticultural science 46:107-114. https://doi.org/10.17221/147/2017-HORTSCI   DOI
24 Fazlil llahi, W. F. 2009. Evapotranspiration models in greenhouse. Master's Thesis, Wageningen University.
25 Karaca C., B. Tekelioglu, D. Buyuktas, and R. Bastug. 2017. Assessment of the equations computing reference crop evapotranspiration. Academia journal of engineering and applied sciences ICAE-IWC (Special Issue):144-161.
26 Katsoulas, N. and C. Stanghellini. 2019. Modelling crop transpiration in greenhouses: Different models for different applications. Agronomy 9:1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070392   DOI
27 Kitta, E., A. Baille, N. Katsoulas, and N. Rigakis. 2014. Predicting reference evapotranspiration for screenhousegrown crops. Agricultural water management 143:122-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.006   DOI
28 Snyder, R. G. 1992. Greenhouse tomato handbook. Publication No. 1828. Mississippi State University. Cooperative extension service, USA. p. 30.
29 Nikolaou, G., D. Neocleous, N. Katsoulas, and C. Kittas. 2019. Review: irrigation of greenhouse crops. Horticulture 5:1-20.
30 Perera, K. C., A. W. Western, B. Nawarathna, and B. George. 2015. Comparison of hourly and daily reference crop evapotranspiration equations across seasons and climate zones in Australia. Agricultural water management 148: 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.016   DOI
31 van Iersel, M. W., M. Chappell, and J. D. Lea-cox. 2013. Sensors for improved efficiency of irrigation in greenhouse and nursery production. American society for horticultural science 23:735-746.
32 Villarreal-Guerrero, F., M. Kacira, E. Fitz-Rodriguez, C. Kubota, G. A. Giacomelli, R. Linker, and A. Arbel. 2012. Comparison of three evapotranspiration models for a greenhouse cooling strategy with natural ventilation and variable high-pressure fogging. Scientia Horticulture 134: 210-221.   DOI