1 |
Agarie, S., A. kawaguchi, A. Kodera, H. Sunagawa, H. Kojima, A. Nose, and T. nakahara. 2009. Potential of the common ice plant, Mesembryanthemum crystallinum as a new high-functional food as evaluated by polyol accumulation. Plant Prod. Sci. 12:37-46.
DOI
|
2 |
Cha, M.K., J.S. Kim, and Y.Y. Cho. 2014. Growth model of common ice plant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.) using expolinear functions in a closed-type plant production system. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 32:493-498 (in Korean).
|
3 |
Cavero, J., R.G. Ortega, and M. Gutierrez. 2001. Plant density affects yield, yield components, and color of direct-seeded paprika pepper. HortScience 36:76-79.
|
4 |
Dennett, M.D. and K.H.M. Ishag. 1998. Use of the expolinear growth model to analyze the growth of faba bean, peas and lentils at three densities: Predictive use of the model. Ann. Bot. 82:507-512.
DOI
|
5 |
Goudriaan, J. and J.L. Monteith. 1990. A mathematical function for crop growth based on light interception and leaf area expansion. Ann. Bot. 66:695-701.
DOI
|
6 |
Heuvelink, E. 1995. Effect of plant density on biomass allocation to the fruits in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Sci. Hort. 64:193-201.
DOI
|
7 |
Heuvelink, E. and L.F. M. Marcelis. 1989. Dry matter distribution in tomato and cucumber. Acta Hort. 260:149-157.
|
8 |
Ishag, K.H.M. and M.D. Dennett. 1998. Use of the expolinear growth model to analyze the growth of faba bean, peas and lentils at three densities: Fitting the model. Ann. Bot. 82:497-505.
DOI
|
9 |
Kahn, B.A., J.R. Cooksey, and J.E. Motes. 1997. Within-row spacing effects on traits of importance to mechanical harvest in paprika-type peppers. Sci. Hort. 69:31-39.
DOI
|
10 |
Kultur, F., H.C. Harrison, and J.E. Staub. 2001. Spacing and genotype affect fruit sugar concentration, yield, and fruit size of muskmelon. HortScience 36:274-278.
|
11 |
Lee, J.H., J. Goudriaan, and H. Challa. 2003. Using the expolinear growth equation for modeling crop growth in yearround cut chrysanthemum. Ann. Bot. 92:697-708.
DOI
|
12 |
Leskovar, D.I., L.A. Stein, and F.J. Dainello. 2000. Planting systems influence growth dynamics and quality of fresh market spinach. HortScience 35:1238-1240.
|
13 |
Locascio, S.J. and W.M. Stall. 1994. Bell pepper yield as influenced by plant spacing and row arrangement. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:899-902.
|
14 |
Marcelis, L.F.M., E. Heuvelink, and J. Goudriaan. 1998. Modelling biomass production and yield of horticultural crops: A review. Sci. Hort. 74:83-111.
DOI
|
15 |
Maynard, E.T. and W.D. Scott. 1998. Plant spacing affects yield of 'Superstar' muskmelon. HortScience 33:52-54.
|
16 |
Motsenbocker, C.E. 1996. In-row plant spacing affects growth and yield of pepperoncini pepper. HortScience 31:198-200.
|
17 |
Papadopoulos, A.P. and S. Pararajasingham. 1997. The influence of plant spacing on light interception and use in greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): A review. Sci. Hort. 69:1-29.
DOI
|
18 |
Schultheis, J.R., S.A. Walters, D.E. Adams, and E.A. Esters. 1999. In-row plant spacing and date of harvest of ‘Beauregard’ sweet potato affect yield and return on investment. HortScience 34:1229-1233.
|
19 |
Reiners, S. and D.I.M. Riggs. 1999. Plant population affects yield and fruit size of pumpkin. HortScience 34:1076-1078.
|
20 |
Sanders, D.C., J.D. Cure, and J.R. Schultheis. 1999. Yield response of watermelon to plant density, planting pattern, and polyethylene mulch. HortScience 34:1221-1223.
|