Browse > Article

Development of Fertilizer-Dissolving Apparatus Using Air Pressure for Nutrient Solution Preparation and Dissolving Characteristics  

Kim, Sung Eun (Sangmyung University)
Kim, Young Shik (Sangmyung University)
Publication Information
Journal of Bio-Environment Control / v.21, no.3, 2012 , pp. 163-169 More about this Journal
Abstract
We have conducted three experiments to develop a fertilizer-dissolving apparatus used in fertigation or hydroponics cultivation in order to decrease the fertilizer dissolving time and labor input via automation. All of the experiments were conducted twice. In the first experiment, four selected treatments were tested to dissolve fertilizers rapidly. The first treatment was to dissolve fertilizer by spraying water with a submerged water pump, placed in the nutrient solution tank. The water was sprayed onto fertilizer, which is dissolved and filtered through the hemp cloth mounted on the upper part of the nutrient solution tank (Spray). The second treatment was to install a propeller on the bottom of the nutrient solution tank (Propeller). The third treatment was to produce a water stream with a submerged water pump, located at the bottom of the tank (Submerged). Finally, the fourth treatment was to produce an air stream through air pipes with an air compressor located at the bottom of the tank (Airflow). The Spray treatment was found to take the shortest time to dissolve fertilizer, yet it was inconvenient to implement and manage after installation. The Airflow treatment was thought to be the best method in terms of the time to dissolve, labor input, and automation. In the second experiment, Airflow treatment was investigated in more detail. In order to determine the optimal number of air pipe arms and their specification, different versions of 6- and 8-arm air pipe systems were evaluated. The apparatus with 6 arms (Arm-6) that was made of light density polyethylene was determined to be the best system, evaluated on its time to dissolve fertilizer, easiness to use regardless of the lid size of the tank, and easiness to produce and install. In the third experiment, the Submerged and Arm-6 treatments were compared for their dissolving time and economics. Arm-6 treatment decreased the dissolving time by 8 times and proved to be very economic. In addition, dissolving characteristics were investigated for $KNO_3$, $Ca(NO_3)_2{\cdot}4H_2O$, and Fe-EDTA.
Keywords
air stream; dissolution; fertigation; hydroponics; nutrient solution preparation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bredmose, N. and J. Hansen. 1996. Topophysis affects the potential of axillary bud growth, fresh biomass accumulation and specific fresh weight in single-stem rose. Ann. Bot. 78:215-222.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Chae, J.H., J.Y. Park, and J.S. Kim. 2007. Changes in the population of the rural areas and the distribution of the tertiary industry. J. of Kor. Soc. of Rural Planning 30(1):109-127.
3 Kim, K.D. 2004. Rural farm population and agricultural labor, long-term outlook and policy challenges. Korea Rural Economic Institute.
4 Nam, Y.I. 2002. Problems and strategies of the environmental control in protected horticulture. J. Bio-Env. Con. 11(1):39-55.
5 Nam, Y.I. 2004. Present status and further prospects for development of closed hydroponics in Korea. Kor. Res. Soc. Protected Hort. 17(1):1-7.
6 Rural Development Adminstration (RDA). 2008. Hydroponic culture dissemination present status 2008. Suwon, Korea.
7 Song, M.L. 2006. Complex rural living space composition policy alternative development. Korea Rural Economic Institute.