Browse > Article

Feasibility Test on Automatic Control of Soil Water Potential Using a Portable Irrigation Controller with an Electrical Resistance-based Watermark Sensor  

Kim, Hak-Jin (Department of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University)
Roh, Mi-Young (National1nstitute of Horticulture & Medicinal Crop, RDA)
Lee, Dong-Hoon (School of Life Science and Biotechnologies, Sungkyunkwan University)
Jeon, Sang-Ho (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA)
Hur, Seung-Oh (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA)
Choi, Jin-Yong (Department of Landscape Architecture & Rural Systems Engineering, Seoul National University)
Chung, Sun-Ok (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University)
Rhee, Joong-Yong (Department of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Bio-Environment Control / v.20, no.2, 2011 , pp. 93-100 More about this Journal
Abstract
Maintenance of adequate soil water potential during the period of crop growth is necessary to support optimum plant growth and yields. A better understanding of soil water movement within and below the rooting zone can facilitate optimal irrigation scheduling aimed at minimizing the adverse effects of water stress on crop growth and development and the leaching of water below the root zone which can have adverse environmental effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a portable irrigation controller with an Watermark sensor for the cultivation of drip-irrigated vegetable crops in a greenhouse. The control capability of the irrigation controller for a soil water potential of -20 kPa was evaluated under summer conditions by cultivating 45-day-old tomato plants grown in three differently textured soils (sandy loam, loam, and loamy sands). Water contents through each soil profile were continuously monitored using three Sentek probes, each consisting of three capacitance sensors at 10, 20, and 30 cm depths. Even though a repeatable cycling of soil water potential occurred for the potential treatment, the lower limit of the Watermark (about 0 kPa) obtained in this study presented a limitation of using the Watermark sensor for optimal irrigation of tomato plants where -20 kPa was used as a point for triggering irrigations. This problem might be related to the slow response time and inadequate soil-sensor interface of the Watermark sensor as compared to a porous and ceramic cup-based tensiometer with a sensitive pressure transducer. In addition, the irrigation time of 50 to 60 min at each of the irrigation operation gave a rapid drop of the potential to zero, resulting in over irrigation of tomatoes. There were differences in water content among the three different soil types under the variable rate irrigation, showing a range of water contents of 16 to 24%, 17 to 28%, and 24 to 32% for loamy sand, sandy loam, and loam soils, respectively. The greatest rate increase in water content was observed in the top of 10 cm depth of sandy loam soil within almost 60 min from the start of irrigation.
Keywords
control capability; drip irrigation; greenhouse water content; soil texture; Watermark sensor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, H.J., D.W. Son, S.O. Hur, M.Y. Roh, K.Y. Jung, J.M. Park, J.Y. Rhee, and D.H. Lee. 2009. Comparison of wetting and drying characteristics in differently textured soils undrer drip irrigation. J. Bio-Env. Con. 18(4):309-315(in Korean).
2 Hur, S.O., S.K. Ha, and J.G. Kim. 2009. Ve rification of TOR and FOR sensors for volumetric soil water content measurement in sandy loam soil. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 42(2): 110-116(in Korean).
3 Irmak, S. and D.Z. Haman. 2001. Performance of the Watermark granular matrix sensor in sandy soils. Appl. Eng. Agric. 17(6):787-795.
4 Lee, D.H., K.S. Lee, and Y.C. Chang. 2008. Development of an automatic water control system for greenhouse soil water content management. J. Biosys. Eng. 33(2):115-213(in Korean).   DOI
5 Lee, B.l. 2009. Protected horticulture, pp. 187-189. Hyangmoon Sa, Seoul, Korea(in Korean).
6 Thompson, R.B., M. Gallardo, T. Aguera, L.C. Valdez, and M.D. Fernandez. 2006. Evaluation of the watermark sensor for use with drip irrigated vegetable crops. Irrig. Sci. 24: 185-202.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Thomson, S.J., T. Younos, and K. Wood. 1996. Evalaluation of calibration equations and application methods for the Watermark granular matrix soil moisture sensor. Appl. Eng. Agric. 12(1):99-103.   DOI
8 Thomson, S.J. and C.F. Armstrong. 1987. Calibration of the Watermark model 200 soil moisture sensor. Appl. Eng. Agric. 3(2):186-189.   DOI
9 Hansen, R.C. and C.C. Pasian. 1999. Using tensiometers for precision micro irrigation of container-grown roses. Appl. Eng. Agric. 15(5):483-490.   DOI
10 Fares, A. and A.K. Alva. 2000a. Evaluation of capacitance probes for optimal irrigation of citrus through soil moisture monitoring in an entisol profile. Irrig. Sci 19:57-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Fares, A. and A.K. Alva. 2000b. Soil water components based on capacitance probes in a sandy soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64:311-318.   DOI