Browse > Article

Dry Matter Production, Distribution and Yield of Sweet Pepper Grown under Glasshouse and Plastic Greenhouse in Korea  

Jeong, Won-Ju (Department of Horticulture & Plant Biotechnology, Chonnam National University)
Lee, Jeong-Hyun (Department of Horticulture & Plant Biotechnology, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Ho-Cheol (Department of Horticulture and Pat Animal-Plant Science, Wonkwang University)
Bae, Jong-Hyang (Department of Horticulture and Pat Animal-Plant Science, Wonkwang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Bio-Environment Control / v.18, no.3, 2009 , pp. 258-265 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research was conducted to compare drymatter production and yield pattern between commercial glasshouse (G) and plastic greenhouse (PG) in Korea. In both greenhouses sawing and plating of sweet pepper was 28 August and 27 September, 2007. Destructive measurement and yield of sweet pepper, cv. 'Derby', was obtained from January to May, 2008. Averaged light transmissivity over 20 times observed 65% in G and 51 % in PG. The averaged daily radiation sum of greenhouses during whole growing period was $9.03MJ/m^2/day$ for G and $7.37MJ/m^2/day$ for PG Leaf area index (LAI) in G crop was 36% higher than the crop in PG at the end of experiment (247days after planting: DAP), whereas there was no significantly difference for 212 DAP in both greenhouses. Total dry matter production was $1759.9g{\cdot}m^{-2}$ for G and $1308.5g{\cdot}m^{-2}$ for PG Fruit production observed $14.1kg{\cdot}m^{-2}$ in G and $7.8kg{\cdot}m^{-2}$ in PG. There was slightly difference measurement of dry matter distribution of generative or vegetative parts to total dry matter between G and PG.
Keywords
dry matter distribution; dry matter production; fruit production; light transmissivity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Demers, D.A., J. Charbonneau, and A. Gosselin. 1991. Effects de l'eclairage d'appoint sur la croissance et la productive du poivron. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71 :587-594   DOI
2 Dorais, M. 2003. The use of supplemental lighting for vegetable crop production: Light intensity, crop response, nutrition, crop management, cultural practices. Canadian Greenhouse Conference
3 Jeong, E.M., W.T. Kim, S.R. Kim, and S.H. Yun. 2008. The state and urgent problem of sweet pepper in Korea. Korea Rural Economy Institute, Seoul, Korea (in Korean)
4 Marcelis, L.F.M. and L.R. Baan Hofman-Eijer. 1996. Growth analysis of sweet pepper fruits (Capsicum annuum L.). Acta Hort. 412:470-478
5 Marcelis, L.F.M., E. Heuvelink, L.R. Baan HofmanEijer, J. Den Bakker, and L.B. Xue. 2004. Flower and fruit abortion in sweet pepper in relation to source and sink strength. J. Expt. Bot. 55:2261-2268   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Yu, I.H., Y. Paek, H.J. Kim, H. Chun, and H.Y. You. 2007. The actual state and improvement proposal of greenhouses for paprika. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 17(2):41
7 Cockshull, K.E., C.J. Graves, and C.R.J. Cave. 1992. The influence of shading on yield of glasshouse tomatoes. J. Hort. Sci. 67:11-24
8 Korea Agricultural Trade Information (KATI). 2009. The state of sweet pepper industry in Korea. Korea Agro-Fisheries Trade Corporation, Seoul, Korea (in Korean)
9 Myoung DJ. 2007. Correlation between climatic factors and yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in glasshouse. Ms.C Thesis. Chonnam Natl. Univ., Dept. Hort. Plant Bio-Technol (in Korean)
10 Vermeulen, P.C.M .. 2008. Kwantitative Informatie voor de Glastuinbouw. 2008
11 Marcelis, L.F.M. 1993. Fruit growth and biomass allocation to the fruits in cucumber: 2. Effect of irradiance. Scientia Hort. 54:123-130   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Erik, A.M. de Swart. 2007. Potential for breeding sweet pepper adapted to cooler growing conditions: A physiological and genetic analysis of growth traits in Capicum. Ph.D. Diss. Wageningen Agr. Univ., Production Ecology and Resource Conservation
13 Lee, J.H., E. Heuvelink, and H. Challa. 2002. Effect of planting date and plant density on crop growth of cut chrysanthemum. J. Hort. Sci. Bio-Technol. 77:238-247
14 Heuvelink, E. 1996. Dry matter partitioning in tomato: Validation of a dynamic simulation model. Ann. Bot. 77:71-80   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Gonzalez-Real, MM., A. Bailie, and H.Q. Liu. 2008. Influence of fruit load on dry matter and N-distribution in sweet pepper plants. Sci. Hort. 117:307-315   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Heuvelink, E., L.GG Batta, and T.H.J. Damen. 1995b. Transmission of solar radiation by a multispan venlotype glasshouse: validation of a model. Agr. For. Meteorol. 74:41-59   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Heuvelink, E. 1996. Tomato growth and yield: quantitative analysis and synthesis. PhD Thesis. Wageningen Agr. Univ. Wageningen, The Neth
18 Heuvelink, E. and H. Challa. 1989. Dynamic optimization of artificial lighting in greenhouse. Acta Hort. 206:401-402
19 Jeong, W.I., I.K. Kang, J.Y. Lee, S.H. Park, H.S. Kim, D.J. Myoung, GT. Kim, and J.H. Lee. 2008. Study of dry and bio-mass of sweet pepper fruit and yield between glasshouse and plastic greenhouse. The Kor. Soc. Bio-Environ. Control. 17(2):541-544 (in Korean)
20 Bae, J.H. 1999. Growing technic of high quality in sweet pepper. The Kor. Soc. Hydroponic Cult. Res. Autunm Seminar:55-74 (in Korean)
21 Heuvelink, E. and R.P.M. Buiskool. 1995a. Influence of sink-source interaction on dry matter production in tomato. Ann. Bot. 75:381-389   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Marcelis, L.F.M. 1994. Effect of fruit growth, temperature and irradiance on biomass allocation to the vegetative parts of cucumber. Neth. J. Agr. Sci. 42:115-123
23 Nederhoff, E.M. and J.G Vegter. 1994. Photosynthesis of stand of tomato, cucumber and sweet pepper measured in greenhouse under various CO2 concentration. Ann. of Bot. 73:353-361   DOI
24 Heuvelink, E., L.F.M. Marcelis, and O. Komer. 2004. How to reduce yield fluctuations in sweet pepper. Acta. Hort. 633:349-355
25 Nielsen, T.H. and B. Veierskov. 1988. Distribution of dry matter in sweet pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) during the juvenile and generative growth phases. Scienlia. Hort. 35: 179-187   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Abdel-Mawgoud, AM.R., Y.N. Sassine, M. Bohme, A.F. Abou-Hadid, and S.O. EI-Abd. 2005. Sweet pepper biomass production and partitioning as affected by different shoot and root-zone conditions. Int. J. Bot. 1(2):151-157   DOI
27 Arnor, F.M. Del., G. Ortuno, M.D. Gomez-Lopez, and A.J. Garcia. 2008. Using growth functions to describe dry matter production of sweet pepper in greenhouses in southern Spain. Acta. Hort. 801: 1113-1120
28 Kwon, Y.S. and H. Chun. 1999. Production of chili pepper in different kinds of greenhouse in Korea. The Asian and Pacific Resion-Food and Fert. Techno. Ctr. Ext.-Bul. No. 478